Disagree w/last poster. If it were disclosed from whence came all the finances for almost any hospital, Catholics couldn't receive medical care at any, "Catholic" hospitals included. The previous poster over-interprets the principal of proximity to sin. If ALL evil connections are forbidden, one would have to be completely self-sufficient, having no dealings of any kind with anyone or any organization remotely connected to evil.
Being a patient at a hospital whose name includes the word "Mason" does not mean one supports or is a Mason! The name change has to do with the inner politics of finance, not with personally espousing the principles of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.
Does being treated at Interfaith Medical Center make an otherwise devout Catholic irreligious?
What about donating blood at St. Francis Cardiac Hospital? Does it make a saint of a wicked man? If one has surgery at North Shore-Long Island Jєωιѕн Hospital because one's surgeon has privileges there, has that patient become a Jєω? Shall a Jєω who brings his son to St. Judes Children's Hospital for otherwise unaffordable or unavailable cancer treatment gain any merit with God? A colleague of mine was taken by ambulance to the nearest hospital; Lutheran Memorial where she had a life-saving appendectomy. Is she now in mortal sin? Should she have refused treatment and died? Was the Sacrament of Extreme Unction I received at Mount Sinai Medical Center invalid? What about the status of the priest who administered it? Is he an apostate? (No to all of these propositions!)
The imputation of mortal sin to an individual soul is not based upon the name of the hospital where he receives treatment. The connection to evil is at worst, extremely remote, unless he goes there with the specific intent to support Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Judaism, heresy, or irreligion.
Truth to be told, most people have little to no control over the hospital(s) available to them. If one DOES have a comparable alternative to a hospital or any other service with an offensive name, then by all means, choose the better.
Where is the line drawn? Must Catholics refrain from buying necessary items because a retailer could possibly be or employ a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ? In most countries, it is unlawful for a non-religious business to refuse employment based upon "orientation."
Perhaps my friend's dearly departed dairy cow, Bertha, is in heaven. After all, the veterinarian who tried (unsuccessfully) to save her is a traditional Catholic! Has my friend gained merit by hiring the Catholic vet?
As my Grandmother (RIP) once said, "Eating at Tim Hortons doesn't make you a donut!"
What is needed when serious questions of this nature arise, is to refer to solid traditional Catholic moral theology. Few laity are experts, but my personal opinion is that this poster has a bad case of scruples. If in doubt, consult a traditional priest.