Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites  (Read 5144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
« on: October 22, 2014, 01:48:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • MHFM:
    "Regarding women, they should generally wear dresses, not pants.  There could be exceptions to this, but they would be rare.  In our opinion, exceptions which would allow women to wear pants would be: 1) if they are forced to work and their job requires them to wear modest pants; 2) if they, for some rare reason, can’t afford the appropriate dresses but have very modest pants; 3) if, for some reason, wearing a certain kind of modest pants is more modest than a dress."

    http://www.SchismError.com/e_archive1.php

    The Dimonds reject the Catholic teaching on Modesty, Accept Cross-dressing, are hypocrites if their logic is applied to their teaching of BoD.

    They believe it is okay for a woman to dress immodestly if their job forces them to.  If a job forced you to sin, you object and say no! There is no compromise! Compromise is modernism!  If a job forced you to have sex with your boss you object! You quit immediately!
    If women can wear pants if forced to at work, then by the same principle if a man is forced to wear a skirt at work it is okay! Cross dressing is always a sin!

    The Dimonds are hypocrites in their use of logic and reason.  The teachings on modesty of the Holy Roman Catholic Church are set in stone, they are immovable.  
    Pope Pius XI didn't say, "A dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers breadth under the pit of the throat; which does not cover the arms at least to the elbows; and scarcely reaches a bit beyond the knees.  Furthermore, dresses of transparent materials are improper. But sometimes it is okay just to wear pants"

    The last sentence was added by me, obviously.  

    If the Dimonds use that same logic and apply it to Baptism of Desire, lets look at it: Pope Eugene IV didn't say, “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jєωs or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives....But sometimes heretics and schematics can go to heaven"

    Again, The last sentence was added by me.

    The Dimonds Accept Modernism on the Virtue of Modesty.  They need to re-examine their stance on the issue and retract their beliefs on Pants.  

    Compromise is Modernism! Being forced to wear pants and not quitting is the same as being a bikini model!  You are giving up your modesty for Money! Mammon can tempt you, and you strike him down!  Don't give in, EVER!


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #1 on: October 22, 2014, 04:20:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Dimonds are schismatics because they are sedevacantis, not hypocrites because they say it's ok for women to occasionally wear pants.  


    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #2 on: October 22, 2014, 04:48:11 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Guest
    The Dimonds are schismatics because they are sedevacantis, not hypocrites because they say it's ok for women to occasionally wear pants.  



    For the record, this wasn't me.

     :read-paper:
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3001
    • Reputation: +184/-179
    • Gender: Male
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #3 on: October 22, 2014, 05:34:57 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I find it difficult to reconcile two known facts.

    1. There are a sizeable number of Trads, who seem concerned to the point of obsession with the women in Pants issue.  Often these are young unmarried men.

    2.  The most frequently confessed sin in Trad confessionals, according to my priest friends, and the testimonies of other Trads is that of habitual masturbation to Internet pornography.

    If I were convinced that the two groups were more or less mutually exclusive and that the "pants liberals" were the prolific habitual masturbators, while the Pants Taliban were for the most part avoiding these occasions of sin, then I would join the pants Taliban since I would be persuaded that their zeal for this issue was god and wholesome and caused them to be more virtuous.

    I'm not convinced.  46 years on this earth observing people suggests to me that these sorts of over-reactions and over-compensations are, more often than not, a sort of psychological reflex action.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #4 on: October 22, 2014, 06:18:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: Guest
    The Dimonds are schismatics because they are sedevacantis, not hypocrites because they say it's ok for women to occasionally wear pants.  



    For the record, this wasn't me.

     :read-paper:


    LOL


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #5 on: October 22, 2014, 06:20:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ggreg
    I find it difficult to reconcile two known facts.

    1. There are a sizeable number of Trads, who seem concerned to the point of obsession with the women in Pants issue.  Often these are young unmarried men.

    2.  The most frequently confessed sin in Trad confessionals, according to my priest friends, and the testimonies of other Trads is that of habitual masturbation to Internet pornography.

    If I were convinced that the two groups were more or less mutually exclusive and that the "pants liberals" were the prolific habitual masturbators, while the Pants Taliban were for the most part avoiding these occasions of sin, then I would join the pants Taliban since I would be persuaded that their zeal for this issue was good and wholesome and caused them to be more virtuous.

    I'm not convinced.  46 years on this earth observing people suggests to me that these sorts of over-reactions and over-compensations are, more often than not, a sort of psychological reflex action.


    Amen

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2833
    • Reputation: +1866/-111
    • Gender: Male
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #6 on: October 22, 2014, 06:22:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As unpopular as the Dimonds are here, why take a swipe at them as an anonymous "guest" cowardly poster?

    And then the "schismatic" swipe against sedevacantists by another anonymous guest coward.  If that gratuity is from who I expect it's from, I suppose another admonition about women being so vocal would be more in order than asserting "cowardly" behavior.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #7 on: October 22, 2014, 06:42:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, who is calling SV schismatic? Most of the ones here are a loving bunch and like the Dimonds, they're all full of prayers and have only charitable comments for the conversion of the current reigning man in the seat ever since they became devoted Dimond practitioners.



    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3001
    • Reputation: +184/-179
    • Gender: Male
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #8 on: October 22, 2014, 07:04:16 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I also find it difficult to worry about SVs being 'schismatic' when the main body of the Church is debating the "unique gifts and qualities" of sodomites.

    Perhaps by some canonical legalistic quirk the SVs are incorrect.  But I certainly don't detect an attitude of schism on their part.  If anything, they are simply fed up to the back teeth with the last 5 Papal claimants.

    Who can blame them for thinking that? Aren't most of us thinking that today?

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #9 on: October 22, 2014, 08:43:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If this is the one item that led you to your determination that the Diamond Brothers are not to be listened to, then you have a lot of learning to do.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #10 on: October 22, 2014, 09:06:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Guest
    If women can wear pants if forced to at work, then by the same principle if a man is forced to wear a skirt at work it is okay! Cross dressing is always a sin!


    Thanks for spelling this out so clearly. Now I know that I'm not going to ask you to join me the next time I'm invited to the annual Burns supper that my Scots friends hold!

    BTW, two thumbs up for ggreg's comments. The OP and the other flakes, kooks, and Internet layabouts have made 40 percent of the threads unreadable.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #11 on: October 22, 2014, 09:15:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think that sedevacants are the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings we've ever known. Except for the Dimonds, they are the only exception.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #12 on: October 22, 2014, 10:27:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: Guest
    The Dimonds are schismatics because they are sedevacantis, not hypocrites because they say it's ok for women to occasionally wear pants.  



    For the record, this wasn't me.

     :read-paper:


    Nor me  :smirk:,

    although I agree with the statement.

    ~ Cantarella

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #13 on: October 22, 2014, 11:59:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: Guest
    The Dimonds are schismatics because they are sedevacantis, not hypocrites because they say it's ok for women to occasionally wear pants.  



    For the record, this wasn't me.

     :read-paper:


    Nor me  :smirk:,

    although I agree with the statement.

    ~ Cantarella


    That's jolly coming from a heretic.

    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Dimond Brothers are Modernists and Hypocrites
    « Reply #14 on: October 22, 2014, 12:09:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: Guest
    The Dimonds are schismatics because they are sedevacantis, not hypocrites because they say it's ok for women to occasionally wear pants.  



    For the record, this wasn't me.

     :read-paper:


    Nor me  :smirk:,

    although I agree with the statement.

    ~ Cantarella


    That's jolly coming from a heretic.


    A meaningless charge when lobbed by an anonymous coward.

    At least she - a woman - had the intestinal fortitude to put her name on that post.