Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?  (Read 5428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Capt McQuigg

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4671
  • Reputation: +2626/-10
  • Gender: Male
Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2012, 06:13:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    The Fraternity of Saint Peter are just a bunch of invalidly ordained, faux-traditionalist, wannabe-priests.

    And they are in communion with Antipope Benedict XVI.

    If you want valid traditional Catholic priests, find a CMRI priest who was ordained by Bishop Mark Pivarunas.

    There are also other validly ordained and validly consecrated Thuc Lineage Sedevacantist Bishops, such as Bishop Davila Gandara.

    But you must be very careful that any Bishops you find are validly ordained and validly consecrated.

    Or go to a Sede priest ordained before A.D. 1968, when they changed the rite of ordination.

    E.g. Father Martin Stepanich.

    Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Bishop Davila Gandara are undeniably validly consecrated Bishops.


    I agree completely.  

    God bless the CMRI and God bless the Sede Priests!

    I just am curious as to why the FSSP does not have a bishop.  I think I know the reason but what do others think?
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #16 on: September 28, 2012, 07:03:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote
    I just am curious as to why the FSSP does not have a bishop.


    There's really only one reasonable explanation, and it's that a traditionalist bishop  is not wanted.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #17 on: October 02, 2012, 06:03:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    The Fraternity of Saint Peter are just a bunch of invalidly ordained, faux-traditionalist, wannabe-priests.

    And they are in communion with Antipope Benedict XVI.

    If you want valid traditional Catholic priests, find a CMRI priest who was ordained by Bishop Mark Pivarunas.

    There are also other validly ordained and validly consecrated Thuc Lineage Sedevacantist Bishops, such as Bishop Davila Gandara.

    But you must be very careful that any Bishops you find are validly ordained and validly consecrated.

    Or go to a Sede priest ordained before A.D. 1968, when they changed the rite of ordination.

    E.g. Father Martin Stepanich.

    Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Bishop Davila Gandara are undeniably validly consecrated Bishops.


    So only sedevacantist priests and Bishops are validly ordained in your opinion? Do I have that correct?
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #18 on: October 03, 2012, 03:13:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: Guest
    The Fraternity of Saint Peter are just a bunch of invalidly ordained, faux-traditionalist, wannabe-priests.

    And they are in communion with Antipope Benedict XVI.

    If you want valid traditional Catholic priests, find a CMRI priest who was ordained by Bishop Mark Pivarunas.

    There are also other validly ordained and validly consecrated Thuc Lineage Sedevacantist Bishops, such as Bishop Davila Gandara.

    But you must be very careful that any Bishops you find are validly ordained and validly consecrated.

    Or go to a Sede priest ordained before A.D. 1968, when they changed the rite of ordination.

    E.g. Father Martin Stepanich.

    Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Bishop Davila Gandara are undeniably validly consecrated Bishops.


    So only sedevacantist priests and Bishops are validly ordained in your opinion? Do I have that correct?


    No, you do not have that correct.

    There are many validly ordained priests in the norvus ordo, but the vast majority are either heretics or are very confused about the Faith, or they do the idolatrous and invalid novus ordo, or are in communion with Antipope Benedict XVI.

    Any priest ordained in the new rite of ordination is invalidly ordained.
    Any bishop consecrated in the new rite of consecration is invalidly consecrated.

    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #19 on: October 05, 2012, 09:40:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Perhaps if Bishop Fellay is expelled from the Society he could become the FSSP bishop?  
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #20 on: October 08, 2012, 12:51:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Can anyone make the case in favor of the FSSP?  
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #21 on: October 08, 2012, 02:30:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • The FSSP, since they do not have a Bishop consecrated pre-1968 changes, and since they operate under the New Church promulgated by Paul VI, are not carrying on Catholic Tradition but are simply an ornate floor show.  One positive aspect is that they do not charge admission to see this show.  However, since you could lose your soul by attending the FSSP, I'd say the admission price is very high.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #22 on: October 08, 2012, 03:44:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    The FSSP, since they do not have a Bishop consecrated pre-1968 changes, and since they operate under the New Church promulgated by Paul VI, are not carrying on Catholic Tradition but are simply an ornate floor show.  One positive aspect is that they do not charge admission to see this show.  However, since you could lose your soul by attending the FSSP, I'd say the admission price is very high.

    True.

    And the New-SSPX is FSSP 2.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #23 on: October 08, 2012, 04:00:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: Guest
    The FSSP, since they do not have a Bishop consecrated pre-1968 changes, and since they operate under the New Church promulgated by Paul VI, are not carrying on Catholic Tradition but are simply an ornate floor show.  One positive aspect is that they do not charge admission to see this show.  However, since you could lose your soul by attending the FSSP, I'd say the admission price is very high.

    True.

    And the New-SSPX is FSSP 2.


    The SSPX has bishops consecrated according to Paul VI's abomination?  You sure about that?
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Did the FSSP ever get that Bishop they were promised?
    « Reply #24 on: October 08, 2012, 04:25:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: Guest
    The FSSP, since they do not have a Bishop consecrated pre-1968 changes, and since they operate under the New Church promulgated by Paul VI, are not carrying on Catholic Tradition but are simply an ornate floor show.  One positive aspect is that they do not charge admission to see this show.  However, since you could lose your soul by attending the FSSP, I'd say the admission price is very high.

    True.

    And the New-SSPX is FSSP 2.


    Attacking the SSPX is no defense of the FSSP.  
    Logged
    Pages: 1 [2]
    « previous next »