Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Anσnymσus Posts Allowed => Topic started by: Änσnymσus on September 03, 2021, 06:51:01 AM
-
I’ve heard the portions of La Salette referring/implying Roman apostasy were not part of the approved apparition, and therefore trads are wrong to see any heavenly endorsement of Lefebvre or prediction of the situation in Rome in that apparition.
Is anyone aware of a good and reliable explanation of what precisely is approved, and what is not?
-
As an aside, September 19 will be the 175th anniversary of that apparition.
-
I don't need a heavenly endorsement of Arch. Marcel Lefebvre. I met the man, he was a saint.
In addition his works have been pretty marvellous too. My entire extended family practices the faith thanks to him offering us the real mass since 1976.
-
'Rome will become the seat of the anti-christ.'
'By their [rotten] fruits you shall know them.'
Nuff said.
-
I don't need a heavenly endorsement of Arch. Marcel Lefebvre. I met the man, he was a saint.
In addition his works have been pretty marvellous too. My entire extended family practices the faith thanks to him offering us the real mass since 1976.
"offering us the real mass since 1976." - Is that when your family came to Tradition?
[I ask only because +ABL never stopped offering the real Mass. So I wasn't sure what you meant.]
-
Am I to infer, based on the total lack of response to the question in the OP, that the definitive Vatican approval of this apparition never included the parts pertaining to Roman apostasy, or those parts which seemingly prefigured Archbishop Lefebvre?
That’s not my judgement; I don’t know much about this apparition, except that there is controversy surrounding what exactly was approved.