CathInfo.com

There’s no such thing as credible suspicion.  If it’s credible, it’s verified, which means it’s a fact.  A credible suspicion is an oxymoron. 

Suspicion alone, without facts, is negative doubt.  Your views aren’t based on canon law. 

Also, fair warning, anyone who reads or hears your errors and who decides to skip mass because of your horrible advice — you are guilty of their sin.  You will be held accountable for their missing mass and avoiding this or that priest.  You are sowing doubts among people and you are wrong.  You are playing games with sacraments, ignoring canon law and putting souls in danger.  God does not take kindly to such actions. 

It’s lent.  You had better take a long, hard look at yourself and make some changes. 

A suspicion isn’t evidence.  A suspicion isn’t a fact.  You people are stupid. 

I’ll bet all of you who don’t like +Thuc have no problems going to the new mass in an “emergency” or even going to the indult.  Meanwhile the doubts for both the new mass/indult are numerous, factual, and constitute positive doubt and grave sin. 

But you’ll ignore canon law in this area and then attack +Thuc based on nothing.  You are worse than hypocrites. 

Who said suspicion was evidence? Are you even reading a thing I am writing to you?


You dont get to pretend like this isn't an issue. Especially when there is a perfectly good and valid line in the Williamson line.