Not a Thucist, only a Catholic that desires proper, just assessments of people according to the mind of the Church. The personal knowledge gives insight into the fact that there is no concrete evidence that he withheld his consent in the consecrations, and the papal mandate refutes the idea that he was a fool. I would like to see how people like you would have handled things in his position, extreme sufferings and all. He had much more to bear than any other cleric at that time. It is a mortal sin to mock others, hopefully that is not what you mean by finding this supposedly hilarious.
The very fact of his public letter renouncing his traditionalistm, his Novus Ordo Masses, photographs abound, show that he was clearly mentally unwell, and therefore claims that he withheld intention are to be taken very seriously. You heard one side, now listen to the other. Instead of blocking up your ears like a stubborn mule.
The Sacraments are the most serious thing we have on earth. Any claim that a line might be doubtful should not be dismissed lightly.
When you have a perfectly valid Lefebvre line, you should not go running off to a line as Thucs just because they issue sweet sounds in the matter of sedevacantism. We cannot verify the claims because the man is dead.
Any assertion by the Thuc cultists priests is just an assertion. That's it. We cannot verify it. So any one who runs head long into these Sacraments is taking his eternal salvation very lightly indeed and will be held to account strictly.
What I find hilarious is the utter foolishness of you people. And yet, it is tragic because you really risk damning your souls. I would sooner go to an orthodox priest (in danger of death - which Canon Law allows) than go to a Thuc priest. Because at least the orthodox respect Sacramental theology.
Topic: Chrysostom on finding a wife... (Read 37713 times)