CathInfo.com

I have explained this multiple times already. I will explain yet again.

The issue is not that it is absolutely a positive doubt, but it is the step before that, which leads to a positive doubt. Which cannot be dismissed. It is credible suspicion. Suspicion that cannot be dismissed just because you like some Thuc priests or bishops want it to be otherwise. There was a MORAL OBLIGATION to investigate. Which sadly was not done by anyone during his lifettime. Now we do not have the means. In the absence of this ability to investigate we are OBLIGED TO ABSTAIN.

This should be obvious to anyone with half a brain. It is the obstinacy of people who do not want to reflect and accept this moral obligation which makes it stubbornness and it is sinful. Gravely so.
There is really only one time in the theology of the Church and this has been outlined for thousands of years that we must NOT PRESUME VALIDITY, and this is when the minister THEMSELVES HAS SAID THEY DIRECTLY HAD THE OPPOSITE OPINION.

This is well docuмented and quite obvious. But it is conveniently left out by Thuc priests.


I am really getting weary of this hack job theology that goes on with so many faithful. But I keep going in the hope that there are some good willed folks out there reading this that might care enough to save their souls.