Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: more Feeneyism needed urgently!  (Read 6044 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Conspiracy_Factist

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
  • Reputation: +157/-19
  • Gender: Male
more Feeneyism needed urgently!
« Reply #90 on: January 16, 2014, 07:21:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Quote from: Guest
    Can we please have more Feeneyism threads on BOB on BOD?

    We need more hammering.

    We need more Catholics to be called heretics.

    We need more saints to be ignored.

    Oh and btw, hands up all you un-baptized members who think you will be saved through invincible ignorance while remaining outside the Church.

    Hello?


    One who thinks he has invincible ignorance while remaining outside the Church is not invincibly ignorant of the Church, otherwise he would not think his ignorance would save him.  

    People who are invincibly ignorant are not aware of their ignorance.  

    I thought that would be obvious but I guess not.

    You really have to break it down for some people on this forum don't you.

    But don't worry.  I will post more threads.  And if anyone claims he will be saved by his ignorance about the Church's necessity for salvation, I will be the first to warn him about the peril he has put his soul in.  It would be the height of foolishness to refuse baptism and trust your own ignorance to save you.  Where do people come up with this stuff.  

    Can you picture someone saying "Hmm.  I can be saved by invincible ignorance, desire or water baptism.  I think I'll take the invincible ignorance route."  

    "Choosing" "invincible" "ignorance" is a contradiction, an anomaly an impossibility.

    If it seems I am over-explaining myself it is because people show their own complete and utter ignorance.

    BTW an un-baptised person is not a member of the Church and those who understand the Church's teaching on BOD do not make such a claim.  This point is made over and over again.  But people read without seeing.  This is why the term "willful blindness" has been coined.  



    do you agree with St Alphonsus here, yes or no?

    St. Alphonsus: “See also the special love which God has shown you in
    bringing you into life in a Christian country, and in the bosom of the Catholic
    or true Church.  How many are born among the pagans, among the Jєωs,
    among the Mohometans and heretics, and all are lost.”4


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    more Feeneyism needed urgently!
    « Reply #91 on: January 16, 2014, 10:53:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here's a nice sampler of articles from Father Feeney's "The Point" newsletter.

    What a great writer!  

    Way back in 1953, he aptly called Thomas Merton a "pseudo-mystic".



    Father Feeney's The Point


    A Catholic Newsletter

    The Point – February 1953

    Edited Under Fr. Leonard Feeney M.I.C.M. — Saint Benedict Center

    February, 1953

    An Open Letter to President Eisenhower

    Saint Benedict Center
     23 Arrow Street
     Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Dear President Eisenhower:

    I am writing this letter in the week of your inauguration to the great dignity which our people have bestowed on you. By the time you are permitted to read this letter, the ceremonies of inauguration will be completed and you will be President Eisenhower, indeed.

    I am writing to you as a Roman Catholic priest, living in the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts. I am the Superior of a little American Catholic Religious Order, recently founded, and called The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. I promise to Your Excellency, as President of our great nation, my respect, my allegiance, and my loyalty — in all the things which God has permitted to be put under your charge, which are many indeed, and are endowed with God’s own authority to the extent to which He permits you to share it.

    As President of our great nation, you are somehow a function; but you are also irrevocably a person, responsible both to God and to your nation for what you do. It is with regard to your personal responsibility to God that I wish to appeal, as one of Jesus Christ’s Catholic priests, privileged to be able to speak to you freely, in a free country, at this great time of your installation. And here is what I have to tell you, Dwight Eisenhower, Mr. President, head of our great nation:

    Unless you become a Catholic, a Roman Catholic, before you die and unless you give your spiritual allegiance to Christ’s Vicar upon earth; unless you become an adopted son of God the Father, by the incorporate requirements of Baptism, and a child of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, by the incorporate fulfillments of the Blessed Eucharist, you will never save your soul.

    You cannot plead ignorance of this great challenge where twenty-six million of your subjects are Roman Catholics, where nearly fifty thousand of your subjects are Catholic priests, where one hundred and fifty thousand of your subjects are Catholic nuns — in a nation dedicated to the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, where the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is in every town, abundantly and super-abundantly in every great city of our nation, in the Catholic churches you have so frequently passed.

    This Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament, living and breathing in all His adorability in the Catholic churches of your nation, can use the humblest instrument through which to speak to you. I am a beleaguered Catholic priest, whom some are denying the privilege of speaking freely to the President of this nation, in a land that boasts that it favors the practice of freedom of religion.

    I do believe that, as a Catholic priest in a free America, dedicated to the Mother of God, I am free to say to you what I now say: Unless your “Our Fathers” are appeals for the Blessed Eucharist, unless you learn the beautiful “Hail Mary,” and call Christ’s Mother the Mother of God, you will never save your soul.

    The end of some of our past Presidents has been sad, indeed. President Harding’s, for instance, and President Wilson’s, and very much, indeed, President Roosevelt’s. I do not want your end to be such a one, and I do not want to have to stand before the Judgment Seat of God, as a Roman Catholic priest in a free nation, who has been afraid to tell our President what are his obligations to God and to God’s only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ, Our Lord, the Word Who became flesh and dwelt amongst us.

    Respectfully yours in the Immaculate Heart of Mary,

    Leonard Feeney, S. I. H. M.

    Pointers

    We have been reminded by a subscriber that this year will mark the 150th anniversary of the birth of Orestes Brownson, a local Yankee who came into the Faith with much gusto, trying to drag in with him such unspirited souls as Emerson and Thoreau. This reminder has reminded us to re-appreciate our position as Catholics in a country where courage and conversion can still go together.

    The urgent message of the Catholic Faith demands a quick and total response. With the East of Europe under Communist domination, and the West of it frightened by the prospect, America remains as our one large hope for such responses. And we are the more hopeful because we have known Americans to be generous and eager for much lesser causes than the one to which we call them — the cause of the Queen of Heaven and Earth, the Mother of God, who long ago saw to it that America was dedicated to her Immaculate Conception.


    Blessed Pius X, the one saint we have had in the papacy since the sixteenth century, would hardly be sympathetic with those flag-waving American Catholics who feel that the Vatican will have made the grade when it gets an ambassador from the United States. Blessed Pius X realized that his dignity and his power in no way depended upon hours of consultation with freemasons of the Myron Taylor vintage. On one occasion, when a representative of a foreign power threatened to withdraw if certain concessions were not made to his government, Blessed Pius X answered: “Let him go, and all the others with him if they like; they are here in their own interests, not in ours.”


    Monsignor Matthew Smith, editor of the Denver Register, is one of this country’s most zealous armchair missionaries. Having little inclination to go out and preach the Faith in order to win converts to it, Msgr. Smith makes such preaching unnecessary, by staying close to his typewriter and thinking up theological innovations whereby those who had thought they were well outside the Church are discovered to have been members of it all the time.

    The Monsignor’s latest theory, as announced in his Register column, is that many Protestant ministers are really Catholics “without realizing this,” and that what they are teaching is not Protestantism, as they thought, but the Catholic Faith, and that “such Catholicity as they unwittingly teach is saving many souls.”

    We feel we ought to warn Msgr. Smith that, if he continues this sort of thing much longer, the Protestants are going eventually to get on to him and realize that two can play this game. They are going to conclude that Msgr. Smith, and priests like him, are really unwitting Protestants, and that what they are teaching is not the Catholic Faith at all, but sheer, unadulterated Protestantism.


    Allison Peers and Thomas Sugrue, the one a spiritual descendant of Henry VIII, the other a nominal Catholic, have both lately died. Peers, who made milktoast translations of the writings of Saint Teresa of Avila, persisted to the end in his belief that Saint Teresa’s allegiance to the Pope was just so much nonsense. Sugrue, who wrote articles against the Church for Protestant magazines, finished his career as the right-hand man of Paul “I hate the Vatican” Blanshard.

    As a further sad proof that Catholic America is fast abandoning even its lipservice loyalty to Our Holy Father, the burials of these two anti-papists were accompanied by eulogies in our Catholic press.


    The television performances of Milton Berle have lately received conflicting appraisals. The first came from the editorial page of the properly Bostonian Boston Traveler. The second was from the well-known television star, Bishop Fulton Sheen.

    Says the Traveler: “It’s time for television to clean itself up and stay clean. The Milton Berle show, for example. Thousands of parents must have watched it with their children, suffering indignation and embarrassment … ”

    Says Bishop Sheen: “Milton Berle is a good friend of mine, and we’ve had conversations about our programs … Yes, I bear the deepest affection for Milton Berle and I love his program intensely.”


    Of special interest to our Jesuit subscribers are the following points for meditation taken from the writings of the founder of the Jesuits, Saint Ignatius of Loyola.

    Saint Ignatius: “Outside the Church there is nothing good. Whoever is not united with this mystical body will not receive from its Head, Jesus Christ, Divine grace which vivifies the soul and prepares it for everlasting life.”

    Comment: Would this pass for good editorial policy in current Jesuit periodicals?

    Saint Ignatius: “All that proceeds from heretics should be suspected, especially books, however good they may be. ”

    Comment: And what would Saint Ignatius have to say about those Jesuits who of late are studying under heretics at heretical universities?


    Archbishop Cushing has announced that in addition to the 18 seminarians who will be ordained at the Cathedral this month, three others will receive the Sacrament of Holy Orders in a special ceremony a day earlier, while prostrate before a battery of television cameras.

    A television ordination is a fitting beginning for the kind of ecclesiastical career that some of our priests have aspired to, and a few have achieved. But the survival of the Faith in America must depend on priests who are willing to let their “light shine before men” without the aid of footlights. There is great inspiration for such priests as are willing to work simply for the salvation of souls, as well as a terrible warning to those who are busy about other things, in the words of the Cure of Ars: “Next to God, the priest is everything. Leave a parish without a priest for twenty years, and it will worship the brutes.”

    The Point of The Point

    With this issue, The Point begins its second year of publication. But before going on, we thought to pause and take a look at ourselves, partly to make sure we are still recognizable and partly to answer some of the questions we have received, asking us why we say the things that we say in the way that we say them. Here, then, is our declaration:

    We believe that the Catholic Faith is not being preached in its purity and strength here in the United States. We believe that this is a cheated country — a country cheated of the one important and necessary thing: the knowledge of what a man must do to attain eternal life. We believe that this has happened because certain conspicuous Catholics, knowing neither America nor the Faith, have taken it upon themselves to make the Faith more agreeable to America — by putting it on a par with other religions and denying the point of its existence, which is to be the single divinely-ordained way to salvation.

    It is at these distorters of the Faith, no matter who they may be, that The Point is aimed: and if it sometimes seems barbed, it is barbed with a reason. Whatever methods we can most effectively use to combat and expose these men, those are the methods we will use. If we can do it by satire, we will satirize them. If we can do it by making them look ridiculous, we will ridicule them. If we can do it by contrasting them with the saints, we will contrast them.

    We would like to see our country become Catholic, and we know this can never be done by watering the Faith down in order to make it more palatable. We think Americans will be brought into the Faith by open, vigorous preaching of it, by the kind of appeal Father Leonard Feeney makes to President Eisenhower on the front page of this issue. We think Americans are tired of Catholic pussyfooting on the subject of their eternal salvation. They want to be told the Truth clearly, simply, and challengingly. We think, too, that American Catholics are beginning to wake up to this and to realize that there is something terribly wrong and out of line about the way the Faith is being preached in this country. And we think that is the significance of the tremendous and overwhelming response to The Point in its first year.

    American Catholics and Ex-Protestants

    However else it may have distinguished itself, the year lately ended will not go down in American ecclesiastical history as an illustrious one for the Catholic Faith. 1952 will be remembered as the year in which Cardinal Spellman liked Ike, and in which Catholic Canada dared to dislike Bishop Sheen. It will be remembered as the year in which our last vestiges of Catholic dogma went up in smoke, after Father Keller’s continued insistence that “It is better to light a Camel than to curse the darkness.”

    And it will be remembered that during 1952 the zeal of American priests was responsible for our customary quota of converts: 0.001 per cent of non-Catholic America was persuaded to join the True Faith.

    From the arrival in America of the first timid Catholics, the spirit of American Catholicism has never been apostolic. The Faith has been content in America merely to “get along,” hoping that the time might one day come when a Catholic would be thought just as “acceptable” as a Congregationalist or a Baptist. After one hundred and fifty years of watering down our doctrines and playing up our Americanism, we are finally approaching our goal. By now, Catholicism’s American evolution has won for Catholics a nation-wide toleration, which in many localities might even pass for respect.

    While they were still striving for this toleration, the Catholics of America could never risk becoming apostolic. Their growth in numbers was caused not by their zeal to convert Protestants, but by the willingness of European Catholics to abandon the “old country” in exchange for whatever livelihood was available in the mills and factories of American freemasons. The resulting dependence upon Protestant pay-rolls served to keep Catholic mouths well-closed on the subject of conversions.

    After a couple of generations of closed mouths, American Catholics came to feel that maybe conversions were not so important after all. Maybe the old folks got it wrong in Ireland, or Poland, or Italy; maybe the way to Heaven is not quite so narrow as Our Lord seemed to indicate; maybe the Blessed Virgin Mary is just the Catholics’ Gate of Heaven and there are other, less devotional entrances for Protestants and Jєωs.

    The tragedy of the American Church is that these maybe’s have now replaced the dogmas which they contradict. Thus, American Catholics have not become merely apathetic about the conversion of their country; they have talked themselves out of the one and imperative reason why their country needs to be converted. This relaxed outlook on conversions explains the current “wasn’t-it-good-of-you-to-join-us” attitude of Catholics toward converts. It also helps to explain that contemporary religious phenomenon, the “noted convert” — whose fanfared entrance into the Church immediately establishes him, he feels, as a spokesman on all matters Catholic.

    Perhaps the two who have assumed their role of spokesman most successfully of late are Clare “Kiss the Boys Goodbye” Luce, and Thomas “Seven Story” Merton. By becoming Catholics, the ex-congresswoman, Clare Luce, and the pseudo-mystic, Thomas Merton, have found new opportunities for advancement in their respective fields of endeavor.

    Mrs. Luce’s Catholicism has lately made her the central figure in one of the shrewdest diplomatic deals of the century: General Eisenhower’s appointment of a prominent Catholic as Ambassador to Italy, a move which both smoothes over the “Vatican representative” row and rewards the conspicuous political support of New York’s Archbishop.

    Thomas Merton’s Catholicism has provided him a long-sought try at literary self-expression. He discovered that an excellent way of having people publish what you say is to join the Trappists and vow never to say anything.

    For those loyal Catholics who have been concerned over the American collapse of Catholic doctrine, and the subsequent influx of Mertons and Luces, there is one dogmatic consolation in all of this convert chaos. There has, as yet, been no tampering with the Profession of Faith required of every convert. He must enter the Church, the Priest’s Ritual still says, “Knowing that no one can he saved without that faith which the Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church holds, believes, and teaches … ”



    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    more Feeneyism needed urgently!
    « Reply #92 on: January 25, 2014, 01:18:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Cushing was no good, so what. That is beside the point; excuse the pun.

    Have a look at this..


    Catechism books that teach Baptism of Desire:

    1. A Catechism for Inquirers by Rev. Joseph I. Malloy, C.S.P.
    New York: Paulist Press, 1927.
    Permissu Superiorum: Joseph McSorely, C.S.P., Superior General.
    Nihil Obstat: Arthur J. Scalan, S.T.D., Censor Librorum.
    Imprimatur: Patrick Cardinal Hayes, Archbishop of New York.

    2. A Catholic Catechism for the Parochial Schools and Sunday Schools of the United States. By Rev. James Groenings, S.J., Translated by the Very Rev. James Rockliff, S.J.
    New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benziger Brothers, 1900.
    With the Approbation of the Most Rev. Archbishop of New York and of Religious Superiors.
    Nihil Obstat: Theodore Van Rossum, S.J., Censor Deputatus.
    Imprimatur: Michael Augustine, Archbishop of New York.

    3. A Complete Catechism of the Catholic Religion. Translated from the German of Rev. Joseph Deharbe, S.J., by the Rev. John Fander. Preceded by A Short History of Revealed Religion, from the Creation to the Present Time. 6th American Edition. Edited by the Rev. James J. Fox, D.D. and the Rev. Thomas McMillan, C.S.P.
    New York: Schwartz, Kirwin & Fauss, 1912.
    Nihil Obstat: Very Rev. Edmund T. Shanahan, D.D., Censor Deputatus.
    Imprimatur: John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York.

    4. A Catechism Moral and Controversial, Proper for such as are already advanced to some Knowledge of Christian Doctrine by Thomas Miles Burke, O.P.
    Permissu Superiorum.
    Lisbon, 1752.

    5. A Catechism of Catholic Doctrine.
    Dublin, 1951.
    Approved by the Archbishops and Bishops of Ireland.
    Imprimatur: Joannes Carolus, Archiepiscopus Dublinensis, Hiberniae Primas.

    6. A Catechism of Christian Doctrine Prescribed for Use in the Diocese of Victoria, 2nd Ed.
    Imprimatur: Alexander MacDonald, Bishop of Victoria.
    From the Preface:
    The writer is indebted to the Archbishop of Toronto for much, if not all, of what is best in this book. It has been already done into Spanish, and is used in South America.
    Toronto: Madigan & Moylan, 1920.

    7. A Dogmatic Catechism. From the Italian of Frassinetti. Revised and Edited by the Oblate Fathers of St. Charles.
    London: R. Washbourne, 1872.
    Recommended by Henry Edward, Archbishop of Westminster.

    8. An Advanced Catechism of Catholic Faith and Practice, Based Upon the Third Plenary Council Catechism, for Use in the Higher Grades of Catholic Schools. Complied by Rev. Thomas J. O’Brien, Inspector of Parochial Schools in the Diocese of Brooklyn.  
    Akron: D. H. McBride & Company, 1901.
    Nihil Obstat: Rev. M. G. Flannery, Censor Librorum
    Imprimatur: Ign. F. Horstmann, Bishop of Cleveland.

    9. An Explanation of the Baltimore Catechism of Christian Doctrine: For the Use of Sunday-School Teachers and Advanced Classes. By the Rev. Thomas L. Kinkead.
    New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benziger Brothers, 1891.
    Received approbations from:
    His Eminence Cardinal Gibbons.
    Most Rev. M. A. Corrigan, D.D., Archbishop of New York.
    Most Rev. William Henry Elder, D.D., Archbishop of Cincinnati.
    Most Rev. Thomas L. Grace, D.D., Archbishop of Siunia.
    Most Rev. P.J. Ryan, D.D., Archbishop of Philadelphia.
    Most Rev. William J. Walsh, D.D., Archbishop OP Dublin, Primate of Ireland.
    Right Rev. D. M. Bradley. D.D., Bishop of Manchester.
    Right Rev. Thomas F. Brennan, D.D., Bishop of Dallas.
    Right Rev. M. F. Burke, D.D., Bishop of Cheyenne.
    Right Rev. L. De Goesbriand, D.D., Bishop of Burlington.
    Right Rev. John Foley, D.D., Bishop of Detroit.
    Right Rev. H. Gabriels, D.D., Bishop-elect of Ogdensburg.
    Right Rev. N. A. Gallagher, D.D., Bishop of Galveston.
    Right Rev. Leo Haid, O.S.B., D.D., Vicar Apostolic of North Carolina.
    Right Rev. John J. Hennessy, D.D., Bishop of Wichita.
    Right Rev. Junger, D.D., Bishop of Nesqually.
    Right Rev. John J. Keane, D.D., Rector of the Catholic University, Washington.
    Right Rev. W. G. McCloskey, D.D., Bishop of Louisville.
    Right Rev. James Mcgolrick, D.D., Bishop of Duluth.
    Right Rev. Camillus P. Maes, D.D., Bishop of Covington.
    Right Rev. C. E. McDonnell, D.D., Bishop-elect of Brooklyn.
    Right Rev. P. Manogue, D.D., Bishop of Sacramento.
    Right Rev. Tobias Mullen, D.D., Bishop of Eric.
    Right Rev. H. P. Northrop, D.D., Bishop of Charleston.
    Right Rev. Henry Joseph Richter. D.D., Bishop of Grand Rapids.
    Right Rev. S. V. Ryan, D.D., Bishop of Buffalo.
    Right Rev. L. Scanlan, D.D., Bishop of Salt Lake.

    10. Anecdotes and Examples Illustrating the Catholic Catechism. Selected and Arranged by Rev. Francis Spirago, Professor of Theology. Supplemented, Adapted to the Baltimore Catechism, and Edited by Rev. James J. Baxter, D.D.
    New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benziger Brothers, 1904.
    Nihil Obstat: Remigius Lafort, S.T.L., Censor Librorum.
    Imprimatur: John M. Farley, D.D., Archbishop of New York.

    11. Biblical Treasury of the Catechism, 3rd Ed. Complied and Arranged by Rev. Thomas E. Cox.
    New York: William H. Young & Company, 1900.
    Nihil Obstat: T. L. Spalding.
    Imprimatur: Patrick A. Feehan, D.D., Archbishop of Chicago.

    12. Catechism Made Easy, Being a Familiar Explanation of the Catechism of Christian Doctrine, Vol III. by Rev. Henry Gibson, Late Catholic Chaplain to the Kirkdale Gaoland Kirkdale Industrial Schools.
    London: R Washbourne, 1877.
    Nihil Obstat: Carolus Canonicus Teebay.
    Imprimatur: Bernardus, Episcupus Liverpolitanus.

    13. Catechism: Doctrinal, Moral, Historical, and Liturgical with Answers to the Objections Drawn from the Sciences Against Religion, Vol. III., 8th Ed. by the Rev. Patrick Power.
    London: Burns and Oates, 1905.
    With Episcopal Approbation.

    14. Catechism of the Diocese of Paris. Translated from the French by M. J. Piercy.
    London: Richardson and Son, 1850.
    Approbations:
    Haying carefully perused the following Translation of an excellent and copious Catechism, published by order of the late saintly Archbishop of Paris, we hesitate not to recommend the same to the English reader, as an elaborate and complete exposition of Catholic doctrine and practice; suitable, from its peculiar plan, as well for the elementary instruction of young persons, as for the edification and benefit of those of riper age.

    William, Bishop of Ariopolis, Vicar Apostolic of the Eastern District.
    George, Bishop of Tloa, Vicar Apostolic of the Lancashire District.
    Bishop Eton.
    William, Bishop of Samosata.
    Robert Hogarth, G.V.—Y. D.

    15. Catechism of the ''Summa Theologica" of Saint Thomas Aquinas for the Use of the Faithful. By R. P. Thomas Pègues, O.P., Master in Theology. Adapted from the French and done into English by Aelred Whitacre, O.P.
    London: Burns Oates and Washbourne Limited, 1922.
    Received the approbation of Pope Benedict XV.

    16. The Catechumen: An Aid to the Intelligent Knowledge of the Catechism. By J. G. Wenham, Canon of Southwark, and Diocesan Inspector of Schools.
    London: Burns and Oates, 1888.
    Nihil Obstat: Thomas Can. Lalor, Censor Deputatus.

    17. The Catechism Explained: An Exhaustive Exposition of the Christian Religion, With Special Reference to the Present State of Society and the Spirit of the Age. A Practical Manual for the Use of the Preacher, the Catechist, the Teacher, and the Family. Eighth Edition. From the Original of Rev. Francis Spirago, Professor of Theology. Edited by Rev. Richard F. Clarke, S.J.
    New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benziger Brothers, 1899.

    18. The Catechism, or, Christian Doctrine, by Way of Question and Answer, Drawn Chiefly from the Express Word of God, and Other Pure Sources. 3rd Ed. by the Rev. Andrew Donlevy, LL.D.  
    Dublin: James Duffy, 1848.
    Approbations:
    I do hereby testify to have attentively read and examined the Irish and English Catechism, compiled by M. Andrew Donlevy, Director of the Irish Community at Paris, which, in all points, is very conformable to both Scripture and Tradition, and very useful to all those who are charged with the instruction of the Faithful in the kingdom of Ireland, as clearly containing the Articles of Faith and Purity of Christian Morality. At Paris, the eighteenth of April, 1741.
    Michael O’Gara, Archbishop of Tuam.
    Similar Approbations were given at the same time by—
    James Gallagher, Bishop of Kildare.
    Patrick Macdonogh, Bishop of Killaloe.
    F. B. Kelly, O.S.F., Doctor of Sorbonne.
    Patrick Corr, Doctor of Sorbonne and Provisor of the Irish College.
    Mathew Mackenna, Doctor of Sorbonne and Provisor of the Irish College.
    Richard Hennessy, Licentiate of Sorbonne.
    F. J. Duany, O.E.S.A., Doctor of Sorbonne.
    Francis Devereux, Principal of the Irish College.

    19. The Catechism of Rodez Explained in Form of Sermons: A Work Equally Useful to the Clergy, Religious Communities, and Faithful. By the Abbe Luche.
    St. Louis: B. Herder, 1898.
    Recommended by Rt. Rev. Ign. F. Horstmann, D.D., Bishop of Cleveland.
    Received the approbation of Louis-August, Bishop of Rodez.

    20. The Catechism in Examples by the Rev. D. Chisholm, Vol. IV. 3rd Ed.
    London: Burns Oates & Washbourne LTD., 1918.
    Nihil Obstat: Franciscus M. Wyndham, Censor Deputatus.
    Imprimatur: Gulielmus, Episcopus Arindelensis, Vicarius Generalis.
    From the preface to the Second Edition:

    The unprecedented success which attended the publication of the First Edition of " The Catechism in Examples," and the demand which is now being constantly made for the book, has induced the author to undertake the publication of an entirely new edition, in which, while adhering to the original plan, he has not only thoroughly revised, but also considerably developed, the contents of the work.
    The book in its first form found its way literally into every part of the world, and demands for a reissue have recently reached the author from almost every country in the Continent of Europe, as well as from America, Australia, Africa, North and South; Ireland especially has been most zealous in its propagation in the past, and in present demands for its reappearance.
    His late Holiness, Leo XIII., not only gave the book his special approbation and blessing, when brought to his notice by two Archbishops, but asked the author to furnish a copy of it for the Papal Library (see Tablet, February 25, 1888, p. 300). Many members of the Hierarchy have also given it their approbation and commendation, and the teaching Orders of the Church, as well as the clergy in charge of schools, have distributed it in profusion among the prizes they gave to the children under their care; and in many a Catholic home it is the favourite book for pious reading in the family.

    21. The Catechism of the Ecclesiastical Provinces of Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa.
    Quebec: Printing Establishment of A. Cote & Co., 1888.
    Approved by the Archbishops and Bishops of those Provinces and Published at Their Order.
    Imprimatur: E. A. Card. Taschereau, Archpus Quebecen.

    22. The Catechism of Saint Pius X.
    Approved of by Pope St. Pius X.

    23. Teacher’s Handbook to the Catechism: A Practical Explanation of Catholic Doctrine for School and Pulpit. With Special Regard and Minute Directions for the Catechizing of Children, Vol. III. by the Rev. A. Urban.
    New York: Joseph H. Wagner, 1904.
    Nihil Obstat: Remigius Lafort, S.T.L., Censor Librorum
    Imprimatur: Joannes M. Farley, D.D., Archiepiscopus.

    24. The Douay Catechism of 1649: An Abridgment of the Christian Doctrine. With Proofs of Scripture on Points Controverted by Way of Question and Answer. By Henry Tuberville, D.D.
    New York: John P. Kennedy, 1833.
    Approved and Recommended for His Diocese, by the Right Rev. Benedict, Bishop of Boston.

    25. The Poor Man's Catechism; or, the Christian Doctrine Explained with Short Admonitions. By John Mannock, O.S.B.
    Dublin: Richard Coyne, 1825.

    26. The Real Principles of Catholics; Or, a Catechism by Way of General Instruction Explaining the Principle Points of the Doctrine & Ceremonies of the Catholic Church, 4th Ed. by the Right Rev. Dr. Hornihold, titular Bishop of Phiomelia and Vicar Apostolic of the Midland District, England.
    Dublin: Richard Coyne, 1821.
    Approbations:
    The following Approbations will it is trusted appear decisive as to the Merits of this Work.
    We approve highly of Doctor Hornihold’s book, “The Real Principles of Catholics, &c.” and we recommend it highly for perusal to Roman Catholics of this Archdiocese.
    Thomas Troy, D.D. &c.
    Daniel Murray, D.D.
    M. H. Hamill, D.D.

    27. A Full Course of Instructions for the Use of Catechists; Being An Explanation of the Catechism End "An Abridgment Of Christian Doctrine." By the Rev. John Perry.
    New York: D. & J. Sadlier & Co., 1860.
    Approbations:
    Approbation of the Most Rev. John Hughes, D.D., Archbishop of New York:
    The publication of “Perry's Instructions on the Catechism,” by Messrs. Sadlier & Co., has my entire approval.
    Recommendation of the Right Rev. Bishop Bayley, Bishop of Newark:
    I am glad to hear that you intend to republish "Perry's Instructions on the Catechism." It is an excellent little book. As a manual for catechists, or as a book of instruction, developing and explaining the Catechism, it is the best work of the sort I am acquainted with.
    Approbation of the English Edition by the Right Rev, Dr. Wareing Bishop of Ariopolis, Vicar Apostolic of the Eastern District:
    Having attentively perused the work of the Rev. John Perry…I have great pleasure in recommending the same, as an orthodox and useful exposition of Catholic doctrine, and well calculated to assist as well those who seek for instruction as those who are employed in giving catechetical discourses.

    28. Dogmatic and Scriptural Foundation for Catechists: Notes on Baltimore Catechism No. 3 by Rev. Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., S.T.D., LL.D, L.H.D.
    New Jersey: Confraternity Publications, 1955.
    Imprimi Potest: Very Rev. James Connolly, C.SS.R., Provincial of the Baltimore Province of  the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer.
    Nihil Obstat: Bede Babo, O.S.B., Censor librorum.
    Imprimatur:  James A. Mcnulty, Bishop of Paterson.

    29. The Baltimore Catechism No. 3 Prepared and Enjoined by Order of the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore (In Accordance with the New Canon Law).
    New York, Boston, Cincinnati, Chicago, San Francisco: Benziger Brothers, 1885.
    Approbation from James Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore, Apostolic Delegate:
    The Catechism ordered by the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore, having been diligently compiled and examined, is hereby approved.
    Imprimatur: John Cardinal McCloskey, Archbishop of New York.
    Nihil Obstat: Rev. Remigius Lafort, S.T.L., Censor Librorum.
    Imprimatur: Michael Augustine, Archbishop of New York.
    Nihil Obstat: Arthur J. Scanlan, S.T.D., Censor Librorum.
    Imprimatur: Patrick J. Hayes, D.D., Archbishop of New York.

    30. The Catechism of the Council of Trent.
    Ordered by the Council of Trent
    Edited by St. Charles Borromeo and approved of by St. Pope Pius V.
    Approbations for the Catechism of the Council of Trent taken from the book, A Parochial Course of Doctrinal Instructions for All Sundays and Holydays of the Year Based on the Teachings of the Catechism of the Council of Trent and Harmonized with the Gospels and Epistles of the Sundays and Feasts, Vol I. Prepared and Arranged by the Rev. Charles J. Callan, O.P., and the Rev. John A. McHugh, O.P. Professors in the Theological Faculty of Maryknoll Seminary, Ossining N. Y. With an Introduction by the Most Rev. Patrick Hayes, D.D., Archbishop of New York:
    In April, 1545, only a few months after the opening of the Council of Trent, it was decided by the Bishops and theologians of that illustrious assembly that an official book should be prepared for the guidance of pastors and all those charged with preaching and with the instruction of the faithful. It was plain that an explanation of the truths of revelation was always necessary; but at that time, more than ever in preceding ages, it seemed imperative that the faithful should be thoroughly instructed in all the doctrines of faith, because the so-called Reformers had their false teachers and false prophets everywhere abroad, spreading their pernicious errors and endeavoring by all means in their power to turn souls from the way of truth. The need of a complete, popular, and authoritative manual was further heightened by the lack in many of the pre-Reformation clergy of a systematic knowledge and method of explaining the truths of faith, and a consequent neglect of instruction and lack of religious knowledge on the part of the faithful.
    For some years the Council was occupied with other matters which demanded more immediate attention; but in February, 1562, after having defined and re-approved all the leading doctrines and teachings of the Church, the Fathers of the Council resolved that an official Catechism should be written which would treat, in a manner suited for parochial use, all those truths of Christian doctrine with which the faithful ought to be familiar, and upon which they are supposed to be instructed in particular on all Sundays and Feasts of obligation. Furthermore, it was the wish of the Fathers and authors of this great work, and of the Sovereign Pontiffs and Councils that subsequently approved it, that its contents should be so treated as to harmonize with the Gospels and Epistles of the Sundays and Feasts throughout the year. Thus the faithful, while being kept ever in touch with the person and life-giving words of Christ, would at the same time be constantly and thoroughly instructed in all the principal doctrines of that revelation which the Saviour has given to the world for man's salvation.
    After several years of careful labor and numerous revisions, on the part of many Bishops and eminent theologians, the Catechism was brought to completion and issued for the use of parish priests by command of Pope Pius V, toward the end of the year 1566. Translations into the vernacular of every nation were ordered by the Council. No such complete and practical summary of Christian doctrine had appeared since the days of the Apostles. Bishops at once recommended it everywhere and urged their priests so constantly to use and study it for their preaching that its whole contents would at length be committed to memory. It was repeatedly recommended by Pope St. Pius V., and in five Councils held at Milan under St. Charles Borromeo it received the highest praise and commendation. Similar eulogy and commendation were given it by Gregory XIII, the successor of Pius V, by Clement XIII, and in our own times by Leo XIII and Pius X. In short, from the time of its publication down to the present time many Pontiffs and Bishops, and a great number of provincial and diocesan synods in various countries, have vied with one another in celebrating the praises of the Catechism of Trent, and in commanding its use. A few of many testimonies may be useful here.
    Speaking of the Catechism, Cardinal Valerius, the friend of St. Charles Borromeo, wrote: “This work contains all that is needful for the instruction of the faithful; and its matter is given with such order, clearness, and majesty that through it we seem to hear the Church herself, taught by the Holy Ghost, speaking to us. ... It was composed by order of the Fathers of Trent through the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, and was edited by order of the Vicar of Christ.”
    In an Encyclical Letter to the Bishops and clergy of France, of Sept. 8, 1889, Pope Leo XIII recommended two books which all Seminarians should possess, and constantly read and study, namely, the Summa of St. Thomas and the Roman Catechism. Regarding the latter he said: “This work is remarkable at once for the richness and exactness of its doctrine, and for the elegance of its style; it is a precious summary of all theology, both dogmatic and moral. He who understands it well, will have always at his service those aids by which a priest is enabled to preach with fruit, to acquit himself worthily of the important ministry of the confessional and of the direction of souls, and will be in a position to refute the objections of unbelievers.”
    Salmanticenses, the great Carmelite commentators on St. Thomas, paid the following high tribute to the Catechism: “The authority of this Catechism has always been of the greatest in the Church, because it was composed by the command of the Council of Trent, because its authors were men of highest learning, and because it was approved after the severest scrutiny by popes Pius V and Gregory XIII, and has been recommended in nearly all the Councils that have been held since the Council of Trent.”
    Antonio Possevinus, an illustrious Jesuit, and the professor of St. Francis de Sales, said: “The Catechism of the Council of Trent was inspired by the Holy Ghost.”
    In his immortal Apologia Cardinal Newman writes: “The Catechism of the Council of Trent was drawn up for the express purpose of providing preachers with subjects for their sermons; and, as my whole work has been a defence of myself, I may here say that I rarely preach a sermon but I go to this beautiful and complete Catechism to get both my matter and my doctrine.”
    “Its merits,” says Dr. Donovan, who first translated the Catechism into English, “have been recognized by the universal Church. The first rank which has been awarded the ‘Imitation’ among spiritual books, has been unanimously given to the Roman Catechism as a compendium of Catholic theology. It was the result of the aggregate labors of the most distinguished of the Fathers of Trent, . . . and is therefore stamped with the impress of superior worth.”
    Dr. John Hagan, Vice-Rector of the Irish College in Rome, says: “The Roman Catechism is a work of exceptional authority. At the very least it has the same authority as a dogmatic Encyclical, it is an authoritative exposition of Catholic doctrine given forth, and guaranteed to be orthodox by the Catholic Church and her supreme head on earth. The compilation of it was the work of various individuals; but the result of their combined labors was accepted by the Church as a precious abridgment of dogmatic and moral theology. Official docuмents have occasionally been issued by Popes to explain certain points of Catholic teaching to individuals, or to local Christian communities; whereas the Roman Catechism comprises practically the whole body of Christian doctrine, and is addressed to the whole Church. Its teaching is not infallible; but it holds a place between approved catechisms and what is de fide.”

    31. Divine Grace: A Series of Instructions Arranged According to the Baltimore Catechism: An Aid to Teachers and Preachers. Edited by Rev. Edmund J. Wirth, Ph.D., D.D., Professor at St. Bernard's Seminary, Rochester, N.Y.
    New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benziger Brothers, 1903.
    Nihil Obstat: Remigius Lafort, Censor Librorum.
    Imprimatur: JNO. M. Farley, Archbishop of New York.

    32. Familiar Explanation of Christian Doctrine, Adapted for the Family and More Advanced Students in Catholic Schools and Colleges, No. III.
    New York: Catholic Publication Society, 1875.
    Approbations:
    Nihil Obstat: Joseph Helmpraecht, C.SS.R.
    Imprimatur: J. Roosevelt Bayley, Archiep. Baltimorensis.

    33. Instructions on the Doctrines, Duties, and Resources of the Catholic Religion. Translated from La Doctrine Chrétienne par Lhomond. 2nd American, from the 8th English Ed. by the Rev. James Appleton.
    Philadelphia: Michael Kelly, 1841.
    Approbations:
    We approve of the republication of the “Instructions on the Doctrines, Duties, and Resources, of the Catholic Religion, translated from the French of Lhomond, by the Rev. James Appleton.” Given under our hand, at Philadelphia, this 3rd day of May, 1841.
    Francis Patrick Kenrick, Bp. Arath and Coadj. of Bp. of Philadelphia.

    34. Works of the Right Rev. Bishop Hay of Edinburgh in Five Volumes, Vol. V: The Pious Christian. A new edition edited under the supervision of the Right Rev. Bishop Strain.
    Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1871.

    Catechism books that condemn Baptism of Desire: