What you say is quite possible. But taken at face value Bishop Fellay has virtually ended the raison etre of Tradition by accepting the New Mass and Vatican II and not insisting on doctrine before a deal. Maybe this priest thinks that his Traditional Catholic Priesthood is redundant and he does not want to be a part of the Novus Ordo.
I have no idea who is writing this, however, whoever it is, you have either expessed yourself poorly or you don't understand what the Catholic Church is.
Bishop Fellay can no more virtually end the raison etre of Tradition than pigs can fly. And no true priest trained under the present SSPX system could think that his Traditional Catholic Priesthood is redundant
As another unidentified guest said, (or was it the same one?!) Lots of falsities going around.
for Asia.
According to Bishop Fellay Vatican II can be understood in the light of Tradition and the Council of Trent. Hence, the poster obviously meant that Tradition, as practiced and promoted outside the official structures of the Church, has no "raison d'etre".
When you say that no true priest trained under the present SSPX system could think that his Tradition Catholic Priesthood is redundant, are you not aware that some of your own SSPX graduates from Australia are now cab drivers instead of priests, and that not so long ago, Fr Brendan Arthur joined the Novus Ordo? If the latter can still be called a Traditional Catholic Priest then there's no problem in saying that Fellay has ended the "raison d'etre" of Tradition.
Are you aware of how many SSPX priests have quit?