Author Topic: Are some men broken as well? (Read 2456 times)

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #80 on:** July 10, 2026, 08:42:56 PM »

A woman and a man both fornicate. Both are guilty of the same sin. Both are judged by God the same. This is the spiritual level.

On the natural level, human beings are affected by sin. As the old saying goes, God forgives but nature never forgives.

A woman is more affected by sins of fornication than men because the woman’s sin is more against her nature. A woman is more naturally inclined to purity than men. That’s why the old saying that if a woman is of the streets that she has daddy issues. If a woman is promiscuous, she is already damaged previously by some emotional trauma. Generally speaking.

A man who is promiscuous is not considered damaged nor is he likely to be, naturally speaking. Because for men, love is way less emotional and more physical. For women, love is mostly emotional.

That’s why it’s always considered worse for men to sin against faith or become atheist. Because men have naturally strong logic and reason skills and if they use this knowledge to reject God, they will naturally sink to the depths of atheism very quickly and hate God or religion much moreso than women.

Each sex has different powers from God. Both sexes can sin the same but the effects on nature are way different.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #81 on:** July 11, 2026, 08:16:39 AM »

Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 10, 2026, 08:42:56 PM

A woman and a man both fornicate. Both are guilty of the same sin. Both are judged by God the same. This is the spiritual level.

On the natural level, human beings are affected by sin. As the old saying goes, God forgives but nature never forgives.

A woman is more affected by sins of fornication than men because the woman’s sin is more against her nature. A woman is more naturally inclined to purity than men. That’s why the old saying that if a woman is of the streets that she has daddy issues. If a woman is promiscuous, she is already damaged previously by some emotional trauma. Generally speaking.

A man who is promiscuous is not considered damaged nor is he likely to be, naturally speaking. Because for men, love is way less emotional and more physical. For women, love is mostly emotional.

That’s why it’s always considered worse for men to sin against faith or become atheist. Because men have naturally strong logic and reason skills and if they use this knowledge to reject God, they will naturally sink to the depths of atheism very quickly and hate God or religion much moreso than women.

Each sex has different powers from God. Both sexes can sin the same but the effects on nature are way different.

I'm undecided on which one is true but I think it's interesting to note that the "women are less sɛҳuąƖ and more naturally pure" is actually a Victorian inversion, for most of history the opposite was thought, based on Galen, Aristotle, etc.

Here's an excerpt from Tractado del uso de las mugeres (1572):

Be careful and take heed: prioritize the health of your soul and body over your vehement desires, even if you are maried to a very beautiful woman who may, perhaps, be insatiable. Like all women, they naturally possess an insatiable appetite. As Solomon says in the thirtieth chapter of his Proverbs: "There are three things that are never satisfied: the mouth of hell, the vulva, and the fire." This was also the opinion of Aristotle in the fourth book of his Problems, problem 16; young maidens, in particular, have an insatiable appetite.
[Graphical material moderated]
Also the word hysteria comes from that, "a wandering womb". This even survives in Romance languages: in Spanish and Portuguese there is a vulgar expression for a lady who's being crazy or irritable on account of not having sex (mal f******), interestingly there's no male equivalent.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #82 on:** July 11, 2026, 10:00:57 AM »

Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 11, 2026, 08:16:39 AM

I'm undecided on which one is true but I think it's interesting to note that the "women are less sɛҳuąƖ and more naturally pure" is actually a Victorian inversion, for most of history the opposite was thought, based on Galen, Aristotle, etc.

You make a compelling argument. There are two things that make me agree with your position.

1. Studies have shown that birth control lowers a woman's libido. It is safe to say most women have used some version. And yet these women's carnal appetites are out of control. Imagine how more out of control their libido must be if they are not taking it. Maybe they would not act on their desires because of the higher chances of conception but the appetite would still be there. Women do not give as obvious physical signs as men do so they can conceal it better.

2. When media outlets cater to women, the subject is very often about sex. Two of most popular podcasts are the Joe Rogan podcast (male dominated) and Call Me Daddy (female dominated). Rogan (as degenerate as he and his guests are) talk about a large variety of things. Call Me Daddy is saturated with sɛҳuąƖ topics.

Gray2023 · « **Reply #83 on:** July 11, 2026, 12:38:32 PM »

Would it be factual to say that men are more constant and women are more extreme? I mean that a man can be happy, but a woman can be joyful, exuberant, giddy. A man could be sad, but a woman is depressed, melancholic, hysterical. I know I explained it poorly, but maybe you get the gist.

Unfortunately it is bad women who have corrupted men. I don't want to cause trouble, but, the young men I know (16 - 20) don't care about relationships. These topics are introduced by poorly formed older men, or girls doing something enticing, or pictures on the internet.

Much of what is written above is a bit vulgar. I think men exposed to bad women have a poor understanding of what true womanhood is. I know for me it is quite discouraging that all these conversations end with how horrible women are.

Side note: I was discussing this with my husband and he pointed out that women are addicted to emotional drama. I agree with him.

I know I rambled yet again, but I accept that sometimes I do that.

hgodwinson · « **Reply #84 on:** July 11, 2026, 02:04:54 PM »

Quote from: Miseremini on July 10, 2026, 03:23:27 PM

No you are not an adult. Physically and mentally your body will not be mature for another eight years. You have no idea what you don't know.
A child cannot function as an adult, they can only imitate or pretend within their limited capacity.

The whole idea of “teenage years” is a modern phenomenon. Men younger than him fought in wars. He’s certainly old enough to make his own decisions.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Are some men broken as well? (Read 2456 times)

Änσnymσus

Re: Are some men broken as well?

Änσnymσus

Re: Are some men broken as well?

Änσnymσus

Re: Are some men broken as well?

Gray2023

Re: Are some men broken as well?

hgodwinson

Re: Are some men broken as well?