Women are great especially mothers. What I'm confused about is if I'm going to adopt a 5, 6 year old child, what does he need at that point besides a mentor, teacher, guardian, protector, spiritual advisor & advocate. I've had the pleasure of working with many kids & disabled, and I enjoy it. I'd rather come home to a sick, dirty child on his worst day than alone. 2-3 boys I'd adopt if I did.
What is the problem if a man raises children without women present. If I choose to devote my life outside of work to my boys, what would be the problem? Would any of their wants be lacking because lack of a mother? What is selfish about taking on the responsibility of an orphan? I'm hearing a lot of emotional lashing from women because they want to be included. If you can give a reason why I should include a woman, I may as well have my own kids.
The whole point is kids are more important to me than a woman and regardless of if I can do it alone I'd rather try to raise a child or more who need it.
While I wait for marriage, I'll practice raising children by raising children. 30+ is the best age to marry, right? I'll spend my 20s raising children then and stay celibate. I want non emotional reasons why I shouldn't.
So since you werent trolling, let me explain then.
The first reason is that it is against the will of God. Even if you cant understand the reasons I or others may explain after, at least accept that God wills for children to be raised by both a mother and a father. This is the order of things created by Him since Adam and Eve.
Observing human nature over 6000 years it is manifestly obvious, long before modern psychology, that children raised by single parents are fundamentally worse off than those raised by two. Excepts abound, but they are still exceptions.
Just a starter, but there are more reasons. Which I am sure others will help fill in on.
Topic: Are some men broken as well? (Read 1660 times)