This is the only situation in which anyone is required to financially support their parents. As long as they have a roof over their heads and they aren't starving, you've fulfilled any obligation there.
Indeed.
And the "roof over their head" need not be objectively luxurious either. You should be respectful and try to keep them happy until death, but if a lakefront property is out of YOUR OWN price range, and they can no longer afford it, then they will have to settle for a humbler dwelling. It would be good to keep them out of an "old folks home" however, if you can make that happen by any means. Especially nowadays, when old folks are used for cannon fodder as it were, as propaganda for the revolution (killing several off with evil vaccines and/or various diseases, calling it COVID, then using that to fuel the narrative to destroy capitalism, small business, personal freedoms, the American way of life, etc.) Let's put it this way: I'm glad I didn't have a Grandma or Grandpa in a "home" in New York City, with Cuomo in power!
Furthermore, if you don't have any extra money, what can you do if your parent(s) are unwilling to move to where you have land, a home, etc.? What if they're stubborn? Are you required to shell out rent every month when you have a spare bedroom or even a spare "granny house" they could live in, on your land? I doubt it. Having land and/or building space does NOT mean you have extra cashflow every month. Wealth and income are two different things. You could have inherited a piece of property, built various buildings on it with your own labor -- but still be extremely cash-poor.
Personally, I need some space (land) and freedom -- but I'd be willing to live out my autumn years in an RV or small, old trailer if that's all my kids could afford. Of course, we purchased land with buildings on it when I was 32, and we would NEVER refinance or draw "equity" out like a piggybank -- so that SHOULDN'T be an issue in my case...