Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter  (Read 1197 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline s2srea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5106
  • Reputation: +3896/-48
  • Gender: Male
APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
« on: April 17, 2012, 05:48:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • You're going to be openly sedevecantist by posting anonymously?  :confused1:
    Logged

    Offline Emerentiana

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1420
    • Reputation: +1194/-17
    • Gender: Female
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #1 on: April 17, 2012, 07:16:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: s2srea
    You're going to be openly sedevecantist by posting anonymously?  :confused1:



     :roll-laugh1:
    Logged

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #2 on: April 17, 2012, 09:02:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: s2srea
    You're going to be openly sedevecantist by posting anonymously?  :confused1:


     :laugh2:
    Logged
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #3 on: April 17, 2012, 09:03:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: guest
    As for being openly sedevacante, Cathinfo is not a serious forum for the sedevacante discussion.


    Actually, it's one of two forums (the other being Bellarmine forums, which is actually a sede forum) that even welcomes sedevacantists.
    Logged
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Emerentiana

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1420
    • Reputation: +1194/-17
    • Gender: Female
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #4 on: April 17, 2012, 09:10:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    If the Pope has refused to back down from his heretical beliefs as evidenced by the acceptance of the errors of Vatican II, which the outcome of negotiations with SSPX (principally Bp Fellay) are a public demonstration thereof, then it is good enough evidence for me to say that he does not have the true Faith.

    As for being openly sedevacante, Cathinfo is not a serious forum for the sedevacante discussion.


    One of the best forums I know for sede discussion!
    Logged

    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #5 on: April 17, 2012, 09:33:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: s2srea
    You're going to be openly sedevecantist by posting anonymously?  :confused1:


     :laugh1:
    Logged
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir

    Offline Cheryl

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 636
    • Reputation: +208/-2
    • Gender: Female
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #6 on: April 18, 2012, 07:49:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: s2srea
    You're going to be openly sedevecantist by posting anonymously?  :confused1:



     :roll-laugh1:   Are we to understand that the poster is currently a closet sedevacantist?  Being a sedevacantist, I'm having a little difficulty wrapping my mind around the concept of an anonymous closet sedevacantist.  Can anyone help me figure this out? :roll-laugh1:  
    Logged

    Offline Francisco

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1150
    • Reputation: +843/-18
    • Gender: Male
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #7 on: April 18, 2012, 09:04:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    No, the SSPX by and large is a genuine outfit and the strongest remaining defense against Modernism. You might disagree with its negotiations with Rome (I do!) but there is no trivializing its importance in the world today.


    Wont its importance be diminished somewhat if it stops witnessing against the New Mass?. What is the point of the TLM if the NOM is OK?
    Logged

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    APRIL 15, 2012 - SSPX Response to BXVI Letter
    « Reply #8 on: April 18, 2012, 08:31:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: Francisco
    Quote from: Guest
    No, the SSPX by and large is a genuine outfit and the strongest remaining defense against Modernism. You might disagree with its negotiations with Rome (I do!) but there is no trivializing its importance in the world today.


    Wont its importance be diminished somewhat if it stops witnessing against the New Mass?. What is the point of the TLM if the NOM is OK?



    And what is the point of the One True Faith if the bogus New Faith is ok?


    You can't possibly have "full communion" with people who don't have the same faith.

    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »