Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest

There is a Bishop P. who refuses to be associated with Bishop Slupski who has been known to ordain sleezy men, like Ryan Scott for an example?  And to ordain those with no seminary training?  Yes, I read the the Post at the beginning.  It is nice to be a guest.

Bishop McKenna had been ordaining sleazeballs and frauds for years and years (but he ordained many good Priests though), and yet neither Bishop P. nor any other bishop made any public statement against him for that.

Bishop M. was the one who conditionally ordained Scott in the first place without looking into his past close enough.

So, sedes can throw bricks in a glass-house, nor blazing coals in an igloo.

Yes, and Bishop McKenna acknowledged his mistake and apologized very humbly for it.  

For which he was rightly praised.

However, that was years after he had been ordaining charlatans, particularly Scott. And yet no one attacked him publicly for that during those years. I believe he did so in good faith, and that he was deceived by these creeps, and so do most other people. This is probably why no one dared raise the issue publicly.

Why doesn't Bp. Slupski get the same treatment?

Is it because it's part of "Traddieland politics"?