Bishop McKenna had been ordaining sleazeballs and frauds for years and years (but he ordained many good Priests though), and yet neither Bishop P. nor any other bishop made any public statement against him for that.
Bishop M. was the one who conditionally ordained Scott in the first place without looking into his past close enough.
So, sedes can throw bricks in a glass-house, nor blazing coals in an igloo.
Who cares about the truth, right? It's all about putting a nice face of Seminary Newsletters and re-writing history, and covering up skeletons at the Academy and Seminary, right?
Who cares if mindless sedes are slandering Bishop Slupski as an "old Catholic" who is "untrained," right? Or if the Bishop and Priests condone implicitly, if not outright support, such slander in their bi-annual Priests' Meetings or annual Conferences, right?
It's all a nice lie to postpone the inevitable despair that is concomitant with realizing that the Faith has been compromised so disastrously, and so much pastoral neglect is either concealed or explained away...