CathInfo.com

Yes, I already knew it's N.O. bs so I'll be anonymous.
I went to the cinema to see it because I'm willing to break my wallet to support a bit more of Catholic representation. However, I was disappointed, I think not for the cinematography but the story itself. Ok I get it, they want to present a young man pursuing his vocation no matter what, but what about obedience? What about changing his way of talking after he entered the seminary? If it actually happened like that in real life then I guess I'm not surprised why people don't trust the Church. You don't give a chance for entering the seminary to a unqualified man just because he argued about it with his superior. You don't give a disabled person ordination out of fake charity. You don't talk with a woman in private when you're a priest especially that was a woman you had relation with. What this "priest" was doing in the story was completely revolutionary to the basic Catholic religious virtues.

Sounds like he fits right in with the NO priesthood to me 

You don't talk with a woman in private when you're a priest[...]

Please, could someone explain this? It strikes me as totally foreign, like it does not occur to me what Catholic teaching forbids this, and such a seemingly absurd rule would never occur to me in a hundred years! Is this an American cultural thing? I'm Hispanic. As far as I know, the universal Church has never forbidden this. I would appreciate some sources on this, please.