Author Topic: Anyone else disturbed by (Read 4779 times)

Änσnymσus · « **on:** February 16, 2014, 10:18:31 PM »

Fr Pfieffers recent sermon where he states Card Ratzinger was at a satanist ceremony where a child was sacrificed? It seems like he is saying some extreme things lately, and though I think he is a very good priest, and I support the resistance, I think he may be getting kind of "out there" at times. There should be bona fide proof before he says things like that,or else it sounds nutty.

PS- I do believe that it could possibly true,( I believe there could be/are Satanists in the Vat) yet without proof, it sounds really bad.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #1 on:** February 16, 2014, 10:23:21 PM »

What exactly did he say?

icterus · « **Reply #2 on:** February 16, 2014, 10:32:27 PM »

These are the stirrings of common sense within you. If you listen to them, you may yet be saved from being a complete and utter crackpot.

If you ignore them, well, down the hatch.

Best of luck.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #3 on:** February 16, 2014, 11:06:50 PM »

in greg's thread: Father Pfeiffer says Cardinal Ratzinger reported to be Satanist

24:30

TheKnightVigilant · « **Reply #4 on:** February 16, 2014, 11:30:16 PM »

Sounds like he's been exposed to anti-Catholic protestant propaganda. There is an absolute ton of this muck circulating in the fundamentalist community. The Prots throw these accusations around haphazardly.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #5 on:** February 17, 2014, 07:07:04 AM »

Well, we have heard of "Black Masses". It is not that far fetched. Where I live I was told that there were "Black Masses" in the 70's.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #6 on:** February 17, 2014, 07:13:37 AM »

If you won't believe Fr. Pfeiffer, then believe Fr. Malachai Martin who actually saw the rituals in the Vatican.

TheKnightVigilant · « **Reply #7 on:** February 17, 2014, 07:55:59 AM »

Why would anyone ever believe Malachi Martin?

That said, I don't doubt that there is Satanic activity amongst the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ clergymen in the Novus Ordo Church. But one shouldn't name names unless they have evidence.

As it stands, this is outrageous calumny against Ratzinger.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #8 on:** February 17, 2014, 04:13:10 PM »

Against Ratzinger? You Bet! and there are many more! Call it a Black Mass, or just plan murder! And don't forget all the money going to pay for abortion, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and Obama where he reigns? Thanks to the Catholic Charities, Catholic Extention and Catholic Relief Services, you name it, they are doing the Federal Gov't's agenda, that makes them not catholic, but your money at work for the gov't.

Matto · « **Reply #9 on:** February 17, 2014, 04:19:21 PM »

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant

As it stands, this is outrageous calumny against Ratzinger.

We do not know if it is calumny. It might be true. I think it was unwise to say what father Pfeiffer said without more evidence but he might be right. I wouldn't be surprised if the men who are committing the greatest crime in history (the Vatican II false church) are actually satanists and are really evil.

soulguard · « **Reply #10 on:** February 17, 2014, 04:44:14 PM »

One thing I often do is call novus ordo priests fαɢɢօts and hypocrites.
It is probably calumny, may God forgive me for it, even if I perhaps speak the truth.
I will go to confession.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #11 on:** February 17, 2014, 05:49:27 PM »

That sounded very disturbing in his sermon. I plan not to attend any more Resistance Masses. While I can understand the initial reason for this Resistance, now it seems that is just causing further useless division and schism. Instead of continuing the great work so far made by the SSPX since its orgin, the Resistance is just causing unnecessary split.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #12 on:** February 17, 2014, 06:20:55 PM »

Fr. Pfeiffer may be falling into pride. He appears to be becoming too puffed up and also quite rash and thoughtless.
While it would surprise me very little to find that ratzinger and the entire congregation of bishops are actually satanists, Fr. Pfeiffer would do well to guard his tongue on matters of which he has no personal knowledge, and for which there is no clear and material evidence.

While we might say that he is shrewd and heretical, no one can say that he participated in any satanic activity. Many people are quite evil and insidious without the need of worshiping satan.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #13 on:** February 17, 2014, 07:59:43 PM »

What bothers me is the rash judgement going around about Fr. Pfeiffer's statement.
A person's reputation and good name is not sufficient enough to vouch for a statement they make?

What makes you inclined to think that he is making a calumnious statement?
Because he has no proof?
What evidence would he need to have to convince you anyway?

Has Fr. Pfeiffer given you any reason to doubt his word?
Just because the statement seems preposterous to you, does not mean there is any reason to doubt what he says.

Ask yourself what evidence would convince you of the statement he made?
If it turns out he has made a calumnious statement then that would be between him and God and he would pay the price for any sin he has committed.

p.s. and even if he did have evidence, most people would find a way to explain it away anyway, it ends up being a credibility issue.

Sigismund · « **Reply #14 on:** February 17, 2014, 08:55:43 PM »

Quote from: Guest

If you won't believe Fr. Pfeiffer, then believe Fr. Malachai Martin who actually saw the rituals in the Vatican.

Martin as about the least credible source you could quite. And if Fr.Pfeiffer did say that, he had better have pictures. Accusing someone of a sin like that without proof is a very serious sin.

Author Topic: Anyone else disturbed by (Read 4779 times)

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus