This is why this link to the audio of Hugh Akins interview on his 700 page
book ѕуηαgσgυє Rising is so very important to hear.
It will no longer be heard for free as of 11-17-12.

http://www.isoc.ws/home.html

Quote from: Guest

This is why this link to the audio of Hugh Akins interview on his 700 page
book ѕуηαgσgυє Rising is so very important to hear.
It will no longer be heard for free as of 11-17-12.

http://www.isoc.ws/home.html

If I have the means, I will pay for it. We should support such endeavors when possible.

I believe it can be heard for free on Rense.com

'cept the nαzιs were also Christ's enemies.

Let's play a game the apologists for Jєωs play.  All nαzιs were Christ's enemies?  Your beloved Benedict XVI in the Hitler Youth?  Didn't the Church make a concordat with the nαzι government?  

You can call the nαzιs the enemies of Christ if you want - I won't argue with it, but none of the pro-Jєωιѕн posters on these boards are opposing "nαzιs" - they are smearing Catholics, stabbing them in the back - because they favor the Jєωs and their abortion culture over Catholic culture, no matter what they claim - their actions prove they will side with Jєωs against Catholics every time.

They will abandon the Fathers of the Church, the Saints, the Popes, the Gospels themselves to avoid the charge of antisemitism - and they will use the charge of antisemitism against those who do not abandon their Faith.  They are backstabbers!

But if you oppose them, you will be called a ʝʊdɛօtrad.

How do you oppose a nαzι today?  Where is the nαzι party?  

Oh wait - you mean Catholics that are smeared as nαzιs by backstabbing ʝʊdɛօtrads.

Catholics like Bishop Williamson - smeared as a "nαzι" by such liars!

Yes, Catholics will be smeared as nαzιs for opposing the Jєωιѕн power - and you are demonstrating it.

It's inevitable.

Filthy "Catholics" who smear their fellow Catholics as "nαzιs" - the way the filthy venomous Father Pfl. smeared Bishop Williamson, are ʝʊdɛօtrads.

There is no doubt about that.

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest

Hitler also reversed existing Abortion Laws in Germany making it illegal.
This did not apply to J EWs as they were not considered Germans.

Does Christ approve of the abortion of foreigners?

Perhaps Ireland should have allowed that Hindu woman an abortion after all, as she was not Irish.

You make the point of this entire post, and are a ʝʊdɛօ Trad.

What dont you get?  
JE  Ws were not Germans.  They were foreigners, living in a foreing land, declared war ON Germany,  and were being deported.  

They had practiced abortion and helped legalize it for Germans, Hitler Reversed this.
Laws pertaining to Germans, were not applicable TO J E Ws, and vice versa.

Christ said J E Ws were of 'Their Father Te Devil' in John 8:44, so perhaps that was Hitlers reasoning.

Not all non-Germans are Jєωs!

Abortion is immoral. Abortion of Jєωs is immoral. Abortion of anyone is immoral.

To say that abortion is allowed to non-Germans in Germany, is to say that a non-Irish in Ireland may also have an abortion.

Relativism, I believe it's called.

Do you not understand that the end does not justify the means? That it is not permissible to do evil that good may come of it?

You defend the indefensible.

Jєωs are promoting blasphemy, abortion, euthanasia, and impurity in this culture.

In many ways they are far worse than the nαzιs.

Catholic bishops would stand up to the nαzιs.  Catholic bishops today cringe before Jєωs.

I find it interesting that Jєωs in Wiemar Germany had NO issue Aborting and Killing German Goy, but you concern yourself with them not having their own anti Abortion laws, condemning the man who imposed said laws for his own citizens.

Its Funny, I dont see you condemning the laws Pre nαzι 1933 for aborting Germany Goy, which nαzιs reversed, same as they did gun control, encouraging Germans to OWN firearms...

Little hypocritical on your part, no?

No.

If someone were defending that, I would condemn it. As is I am arguing with views that are actually being expressed!

And I have condemned abortion for anyone. I have not defended abortion of anyone at all, whereas "Guest" here has defended the abortion of Jєωs.

It is indefensible.

I get accused of being a "ʝʊdɛօtrad" for saying that it is not permissible to do evil that good may come of it!

Jєωs may think that it is, but Catholics do not.

It would seem, therefore, that if anyone is a ʝʊdɛօtrad, it is the fellow defending the indefensible!

Whats indefensible is shilling for more J E W babies when they declared war on your nation, were intent on spreading Marxist Revolution or destrying it via world war.
Wake up people.

You wake up.

If you use evil means, you may succeed in removing the Jєωιѕн peril, but it will be at the eternal expense of your soul.

But, I guess, if you can drag a lot of unbaptised Jєωs to Hell with you, it will be worth it, right?