Why is your opinion of Fatima? I'd like to know why you do not support it?

"The Angel gave you Holy Communion, but what was it that he gave to Jacinta and me?"
“it was Holy Communion, too,’ replied Jacinta, with inexpressible joy. "Didn’t you see that it was the Blood that fell from the Host?’”
“I felt that God was within me, but I did not know how!” (Francisco)?

I am suspect of Fatima for several reasons;
- The the first time the children saw the apparition, she was wearing a short dress of knee height and earrings (in later apparitions she wore a dress to her feet).
- Adults who came to the later apparitions said they heard the sound of insects they she spoke and only Lucia could understand her.
- When the 3 seers were held from going to one of the apparitions at the appointed time, the other children seeing the disappointment of 'our lady' became blood thirsty.
- The apparition was said to appear with the sound of thunder and like a flash of lightning (with the sound coming first).
- Christ warned us of false signs of wonders, the 'miracle' of the sun seems fit to be wary of.
- Abnormal support to the apparition by all sides, e.g SSPX, dimonds, muslims, other trads and even vatican 2 anti-popes...
- Muslims like fatima; mohammed daughter was called fatimah and has a title of 'pure one' (immaculate)
- The Sacred heart devotion used to be to Jesus AND Mary
- The 'angel' would leave the children exhausted
- Lucia said blood fell from the host, also angels don't have the power to consecrate the sacramentThis revelation has too many suspect points for me. After seeing how many modern 19th/20th century revelations are outright fake or have 'extra' things added to them that weren't originally there also makes me suspect Fatima. Portugal was already taken over by freemasons at that time as well. The short skirt is probably one of the larger red flags though the other stuff also raises concerns. This and other strange answers from the children seems to be the reason why the interrogations from the priests to the children have never been fully published in the English language. However, it can apparently be found in the book 'Os Mouros Fatimidas e as Aparicoes de Fatima'

That is interesting because I was shocked a few years ago when a trad priest told me he didn't believe in it.

I said, "The parts after VII right?"

He said, "No even before."

Whaaaaat?  :O

He said he went to Portugal and requested to see the original docuмents and there were many problems. 

He said the children disobeyed and spoke badly about their parents and the prophecy about the light in the sky was added years after the event.

I didn't know what to make of that but just recently saw this book which I hear also makes these claims but I can't read it very well.

https://archive.org/details/the-lady-of-fatima-and-the-antichrist

Plus there are some videos on Rumble with investigators uncovering some strange things.

I still don't know what to make of it really, especially now with all of the fake Sr Lucy and fake Third Secret stuff, plus the fake miracle of the Sun at Medjugorje.

I will always be devoted to Our Lady, but my faith does not hinge on any private revelations.

Three Days of Darkness has been debunked as well.

Malachi Martin is a liar and a grotesque blasphemer so you can't really take anything he says seriously.

Well, we all really need to pray for discernment I guess.

I read the first 10 pages of this ebook, mostly of exaggerations, misunderstanding of the context, and...get this...the author calls Leo XIII as an Antipope! Plus Pius IX being the last true pope.