Author Topic: 12 Lost Tribes of Israel (Read 3592 times)

Änσnymσus · « **on:** August 01, 2014, 09:08:13 PM »

Was Jesus from an Aryan race, instead of "Jєω" as is commonly believed?

This is a serious question for serious answers.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #1 on:** August 01, 2014, 09:28:22 PM »

Our Lord Jesus Christ was from the tribe of King David. you can go to
the New Testament and read the genealogy in the first Chapter of
Matthew.
Today, since there are no real Jєωs of the time of our Lord. The 12
tribes are extinct because after 70 A.D. when the Temple was
destroyed in Jerusalem by the Romans. The Romans were efficient
in everything they did such as destroying buildings. There was
nothing left of the Temple not even the walling wall that is actually
part of a Roman Fort. If people believe that the wailing was is
true, it would make a liar out of our Lord in which one stone
would be on top of an another stone referring to the coming
destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D.
The people whom call themselves JєωS are actually Christian
haters and mini anti Christ's. It would be the sin to be around
these people because their goal is to destroy Christianity and
make every single Christian a pagan secularist whom believes
that one or no religion is as good as an another. Their goal
is to increase the kingdom of Satan.
It has work well in America, and post revolutionary France.
Especially the post Vatican 2 era since 1965.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #2 on:** August 01, 2014, 11:54:05 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

Our Lord Jesus Christ was from the tribe of King David. you can go to
the New Testament and read the genealogy in the first Chapter of
Matthew.
Today, since there are no real Jєωs of the time of our Lord. The 12
tribes are extinct because after 70 A.D. when the Temple was
destroyed in Jerusalem by the Romans. The Romans were efficient
in everything they did such as destroying buildings. There was
nothing left of the Temple not even the walling wall that is actually
part of a Roman Fort. If people believe that the wailing was is
true, it would make a liar out of our Lord in which one stone
would be on top of an another stone referring to the coming
destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D.
The people whom call themselves JєωS are actually Christian
haters and mini anti Christ's. It would be the sin to be around
these people because their goal is to destroy Christianity and
make every single Christian a pagan secularist whom believes
that one or no religion is as good as an another. Their goal
is to increase the kingdom of Satan.
It has work well in America, and post revolutionary France.
Especially the post Vatican 2 era since 1965.

I agree..all I hear being repeated all the time is Jesus was a Jєω bla bla as if there's a connection from Jesus to today's Jєωs (Christ Killers)...if you read the early church fathers they forbade even working for a Jєω...I try telling people Jesus was judean but theyl ook at me in wonder as if to say what on earth am I talking about...what do you tell people exactly.. in a quick sentence because my approach doesn't work

BTNYC · « **Reply #3 on:** August 02, 2014, 11:39:33 AM »

Our Lord was a Jєω in the truest sense - a Hebrew Israelite of the Tribe of Judah, descended from King David.

The overwhelming majority of "Jєωs" today are ethnically descended from Khazars and are not even Semitic at all... Arabs are Semites, as are descendents of the Phoenicians like the Lebanese and the Maltese (my own ethnicity).

In other words, I'm more of a Semite than the average "Jєω" today... Kind of makes plain the absurdity of applying the term "anti-semitism" only to those enemies of the group with the most dubious claim to being Semites.

Jєωs are counterfeits ethnically, religiously, and nationally. An impressive trifecta.

Recall the words of Sacred Scripture:

Behold, I will bring of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, who say they are Jєωs, and are not, but do lie.

-Apocalypse 3:9

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #4 on:** August 02, 2014, 11:50:08 AM »

The Khazar stuff is a myth. Note that I do not agree with all of the opinions expressed in this article. David Duke is a Protestant and he speaks like one. He's also motivated by some strange racial, rather than religious, animosity toward Jєωs. Still, the article is very informative.

http://davidduke.com/rethinking-khazar-theory/

-TheKnightVigilant

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #5 on:** August 03, 2014, 01:13:48 AM »

So then, which images of Christ would be the most likely to be similar to how He looked? The ones where he appears European, with blond or brownish hair and fair skin, or the ones where he is swarthy and dark haired?

TheKnightVigilant · « **Reply #6 on:** August 03, 2014, 07:21:43 AM »

See the Shroud of Turin. He would have been Semitic Mediterranean in appearance.

The Samaritans probably provide a good picture of what the Jєωs of Jesus' time would have looked like. Most are tanned, but some are very fair skinned. The majority are brunette but a few blondes and redheads are found. Overall they are not too dissimilar to many modern Jєωs.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/25/Samaritans%27_Passover_at_Mount_Gerizim_5671133587.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/Flickr_-_Government_Press_Office_%28GPO%29_-_Samaritans_praying_during_Passover_holiday_ceremony_on_mount_Grizim.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Flickr_-_Government_Press_Office_%28GPO%29_-_Samaritan_Elder_in_Passover_Prayer_Service.jpg

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #7 on:** August 03, 2014, 10:19:55 AM »

Quote from: Guest

So then, which images of Christ would be the most likely to be similar to how He looked? The ones where he appears European, with blond or brownish hair and fair skin, or the ones where he is swarthy and dark haired?

I think there is a strong possibility that Jesus Christ was actually aryan.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #8 on:** August 03, 2014, 11:19:44 AM »

Another race thread? Really? What an incredible waste of time!

Whatever Christ's appearance, whether "aryan," Jєωιѕн, Semitic, African, or anything else, His sacrifice was for all, and men of any race can be saved by it. No race had any special graces or is "chosen" in any way. The only "chosen people" now are Catholics, and they can be of any race or color.

BTNYC · « **Reply #9 on:** August 03, 2014, 12:52:54 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest
So then, which images of Christ would be the most likely to be similar to how He looked? The ones where he appears European, with blond or brownish hair and fair skin, or the ones where he is swarthy and dark haired?

I think there is a strong possibility that Jesus Christ was actually aryan.

Unlikely. And unimportant, anyway.

As TKV pointed out, the Shroud of Turnin is the most reliable Image we have of Our Lord. The very earliest images of Christ were of a beardless youth (sometimes even wielding a wand) and were largely symbolic, rather than historical. That soon changed when the Shroud became more well known and accepted as a True Image of Christ (some say the "Mandylion of Edessa" was in fact the Shroud folded and framed with only the face showing, a theory with which I agree). Images of Our Lord soon became quite uniform, and all resembled the Man on the Shroud - which is to say a man of Levantine / Mediterranean appearance.

From St Catherine's Monastery, Sinai, 6th Century:

Comodilla Catacomb, 4th Century (oldest known image of a bearded Christ):

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #10 on:** August 03, 2014, 02:48:27 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Another race thread? Really? What an incredible waste of time!

Whatever Christ's appearance, whether "aryan," Jєωιѕн, Semitic, African, or anything else, His sacrifice was for all, and men of any race can be saved by it. No race had any special graces or is "chosen" in any way. The only "chosen people" now are Catholics, and they can be of any race or color.

as always you are the one who is bringing racism into the discussion.

The question was simple and straight forward. was jesus aryan?

if you see something wrong with Jesus being an aryan, the you have been brainwashed by the anti - white liberal propaganda.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #11 on:** August 03, 2014, 08:41:28 PM »

Quote from: Guest

The question was simple and straight forward. was jesus aryan?

A question whose answer has no bearing whatsoever on man's salvation. A question that also has been answered: no. The Shroud of Turin shows a middle eastern/Semitic man.

Quote from: Guest

if you see something wrong with Jesus being an aryan, the you have been brainwashed by the anti - white liberal propaganda.

I don't see anything wrong with Jesus being white, except for the fact that it almost certainly isn't accurate. I would also have no problem with Jesus being black, Asian, Indian, or anything else, also except for the fact that it isn't accurate. I don't have any problem with Him being middle eastern/Semitic, considering it is most likely the truth.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #12 on:** August 03, 2014, 08:47:08 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest
The question was simple and straight forward. was jesus aryan?

A question whose answer has no bearing whatsoever on man's salvation.

This thread has NOTHING to do with man's salvation.

Men from all races can be saved in Christ's New Law, but this is irrelevant to the original question. It is only about the race of Jesus, not race superiority.

BTNYC · « **Reply #13 on:** August 04, 2014, 08:06:05 AM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest
Quote from: Guest
The question was simple and straight forward. was jesus aryan?

A question whose answer has no bearing whatsoever on man's salvation.

This thread has NOTHING to do with man's salvation.

Men from all races can be saved in Christ's New Law, but this is irrelevant to the original question. It is only about the race of Jesus, not race superiority.

Meaning the Catholic Church.

Let's not risk giving an impression that heretics and schismatics have any good hope of Salvation.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #14 on:** August 04, 2014, 10:30:16 AM »

Quote from: Guest

Quote from: Guest
Quote from: Guest
The question was simple and straight forward. was jesus aryan?

A question whose answer has no bearing whatsoever on man's salvation.

This thread has NOTHING to do with man's salvation.

Men from all races can be saved in Christ's New Law, but this is irrelevant to the original question. It is only about the race of Jesus, not race superiority.

If the question was posed simply on the basis of curiosity, then you have your answer (for the third time, at least): the image on the Shroud of Turin clearly shows a middle eastern/Semitic man, and not a white/Aryan man.

Author Topic: 12 Lost Tribes of Israel (Read 3592 times)

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus