Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: the Dimonds monastery  (Read 7753 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
the Dimonds monastery
« Reply #75 on: January 31, 2014, 01:38:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: gooch
    Saint Gregory nαzιanzen, an eastern father and doctor of the Church, wrote in opposition to this theorizing about the efficacy of a catechumen’s desire for baptism. After demonstrating four different states of conviction possible in a catechumen, he says, concerning the most ardent of them, that they are neither worthy of punishment nor glory, but still they are at a loss. I only need to quote his conclusion as regards the latter in terms of the salvific efficacy of their will:

    “If you were able to judge a man who intends to commit murder solely by his intention and without any act of murder, then you could likewise reckon as baptized one who desired baptism. But, since you cannot do the former, how can you do the latter? If you prefer, we will put it this way: If, in your opinion, desire has equal power with actual baptism, then make the same judgment in regard to glory. You would then be satisfied to desire glory, as though that longing itself were glory. Do you suffer any damage by not attaining the actual glory, as long as you have a desire for it? I cannot see it!”  (Oration on Divine Light, XL, #23)

    you disagree with this saint? is he a heretic?


    Saint Gregory nαzιanzen wrote:

    Quote
    XXIII. And so also in those who fail to receive the Gift, some are altogether animal or bestial, according as they are either foolish or wicked; and this, I think, has to be added to their other sins, that they have no reverence at all for this Gift, but look upon it as a mere gift— to be acquiesced in if given them, and if not given them, then to be neglected. Others know and honour the Gift, but put it off; some through laziness, some through greediness. Others are not in a position to receive it, perhaps on account of infancy, or some perfectly involuntary circuмstance through which they are prevented from receiving it, even if they wish. As then in the former case we found much difference, so too in this. They who altogether despise it are worse than they who neglect it through greed or carelessness. These are worse than they who have lost the Gift through ignorance or tyranny, for tyranny is nothing but an involuntary error. And I think that the first will have to suffer punishment, as for all their sins, so for their contempt of baptism; and that the second will also have to suffer, but less, because it was not so much through wickedness as through folly that they wrought their failure; and that the third will be neither glorified nor punished by the righteous Judge, as unsealed and yet not wicked, but persons who have suffered rather than done wrong. For not every one who is not bad enough to be punished is good enough to be honoured; just as not every one who is not good enough to be honoured is bad enough to be punished. And I look upon it as well from another point of view. If you judge the murderously disposed man by his will alone, apart from the act of murder, then you may reckon as baptized him who desired baptism apart from the reception of baptism. But if you cannot do the one how can you do the other? I cannot see it. Or, if you like, we will put it thus:— If desire in your opinion has equal power with actual baptism, then judge in the same way in regard to glory, and you may be content with longing for it, as if that were itself glory. And what harm is done you by your not attaining the actual glory, as long as you have the desire for it?
    . Found HERE

    Saint Gregory is discussing those who will not be baptized and think that their desire will suffice.  Do you understand this?  The excerpt you posted leaves out the context.  Did you just read it and trust the Dimonds, or did you look at the original to learn for yourself?


    The Dimonds took a quote out of context?  Will wonders never cease!  :roll-laugh1:

    They like to call people liars.  That is what they are.

    They call everyone heretics.  That is what they are.

    They say everyone is damned.  That is the path they are on.

    Irony of ironies, the accusers stand accused, the pan hath called the kettle black, and the Dimonds call white black.  Someone mail those bad boys a scapular and give them a good night dolly they can take to bed with them and take their frustrations out on, maybe then they would be a little more charitable with the living and the dead.  


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    the Dimonds monastery
    « Reply #76 on: January 31, 2014, 08:05:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Guest
    Quote from: Ambrose
    Quote from: gooch
    Saint Gregory nαzιanzen, an eastern father and doctor of the Church, wrote in opposition to this theorizing about the efficacy of a catechumen’s desire for baptism. After demonstrating four different states of conviction possible in a catechumen, he says, concerning the most ardent of them, that they are neither worthy of punishment nor glory, but still they are at a loss. I only need to quote his conclusion as regards the latter in terms of the salvific efficacy of their will:

    “If you were able to judge a man who intends to commit murder solely by his intention and without any act of murder, then you could likewise reckon as baptized one who desired baptism. But, since you cannot do the former, how can you do the latter? If you prefer, we will put it this way: If, in your opinion, desire has equal power with actual baptism, then make the same judgment in regard to glory. You would then be satisfied to desire glory, as though that longing itself were glory. Do you suffer any damage by not attaining the actual glory, as long as you have a desire for it? I cannot see it!”  (Oration on Divine Light, XL, #23)

    you disagree with this saint? is he a heretic?


    Saint Gregory nαzιanzen wrote:

    Quote
    XXIII. And so also in those who fail to receive the Gift, some are altogether animal or bestial, according as they are either foolish or wicked; and this, I think, has to be added to their other sins, that they have no reverence at all for this Gift, but look upon it as a mere gift— to be acquiesced in if given them, and if not given them, then to be neglected. Others know and honour the Gift, but put it off; some through laziness, some through greediness. Others are not in a position to receive it, perhaps on account of infancy, or some perfectly involuntary circuмstance through which they are prevented from receiving it, even if they wish. As then in the former case we found much difference, so too in this. They who altogether despise it are worse than they who neglect it through greed or carelessness. These are worse than they who have lost the Gift through ignorance or tyranny, for tyranny is nothing but an involuntary error. And I think that the first will have to suffer punishment, as for all their sins, so for their contempt of baptism; and that the second will also have to suffer, but less, because it was not so much through wickedness as through folly that they wrought their failure; and that the third will be neither glorified nor punished by the righteous Judge, as unsealed and yet not wicked, but persons who have suffered rather than done wrong. For not every one who is not bad enough to be punished is good enough to be honoured; just as not every one who is not good enough to be honoured is bad enough to be punished. And I look upon it as well from another point of view. If you judge the murderously disposed man by his will alone, apart from the act of murder, then you may reckon as baptized him who desired baptism apart from the reception of baptism. But if you cannot do the one how can you do the other? I cannot see it. Or, if you like, we will put it thus:— If desire in your opinion has equal power with actual baptism, then judge in the same way in regard to glory, and you may be content with longing for it, as if that were itself glory. And what harm is done you by your not attaining the actual glory, as long as you have the desire for it?
    . Found HERE

    Saint Gregory is discussing those who will not be baptized and think that their desire will suffice.  Do you understand this?  The excerpt you posted leaves out the context.  Did you just read it and trust the Dimonds, or did you look at the original to learn for yourself?


    The Dimonds took a quote out of context?  Will wonders never cease!  :roll-laugh1:

    They like to call people liars.  That is what they are.

    They call everyone heretics.  That is what they are.

    They say everyone is damned.  That is the path they are on.

    Irony of ironies, the accusers stand accused, the pan hath called the kettle black, and the Dimonds call white black.  Someone mail those bad boys a scapular and give them a good night dolly they can take to bed with them and take their frustrations out on, maybe then they would be a little more charitable with the living and the dead.  


    in this particular case you are wrong, they haven't taken anything out of context..Saint Gregory is discussing 1. those who will not be baptized and think that their desire will suffice 2. those who are lazy and 3. those who by "involuntary circuмstance through which they are prevented from receiving it '
    he totally refutes baptism of desire...sorry