parentsfortruth
Reputation: 1553
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 2,683
|
| Emerentiana said: | | Quote: | | The independent priest are our last line of defense against consiliar madness. |
The independent priests are not the ONLY line of defense against conciliar madness.
All of the traditional groups have priests that are validly ordained. BTW, ALL of the independent priests and the trad group priests hold a sedevacantist position. |
No, Emerentiana.
The priest where I go is no sedevacantist, and he's an independent priest.
|
.........................
Matthew 5:37
But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
My avatar is Monsignor Gregory Hesse. This picture was taken in 1998. He died in 2005. RIP
"If a priest ever tells you that Vatican II can be viewed 'in light of tradition,' run away." --Father Gregory Hesse.
|
| Posted May 22, 2012, 3:36 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Telesphorus
Reputation: 8767
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 12,366
|
| brainglitch said: | | What about that conference Seraphim is talking about, where sedevacantists are very clearly called schismatic? |
Calling a group of sedevacantists schismatic does not make the position schismatic. If the position were schismatic, he would say it is not permissible to say it. He would not say what he said.
Did Archbishop Lefebvre say Protestantism, Old Catholicism could be true? Yet you compare sedevacantism, something he did say could be true, to those positions, because you are in a cult bubble.
| Quote: | | Afraid it might burst your bubble? |
If the Archbishop believed certain sedes were schismatic, or even if he were inconsistent, it wouldn't change the fact he tolerated sedevacantism as something that could be true. That he didn't say one couldn't say it.
If a position is schismatic, one must not say it's possibly true. That is simple logic. Try using it.
|
.........................
NEW SSPX - NOW WITH BETTER TRADITION
|
| Posted May 22, 2012, 3:37 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
