Cecelia
Reputation: 9
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 51
|
Moderator:
You make a lot of charges (did you write this article, or paste it from Traditio? It reads like a Traditio screed) but don't provide much documentation or evidence.
Footnotes? Evidence?
Grave charges should be met with evidence, not some kind of rabble-rousing 12-hit punch, along the lines of "fling enough BS at the wall and hopefully some of it will stick!"
Again, that is the modus operandi of Traditio, and I won't allow that kind of crap here.
If you have a charge against one or more priests of God (that is what they are, by the way, especially the clergy of the SSPX), you better A) know what you're doing B) have a good reason, and C) have proof.
I'm not going to allow a slander-fest against Bishop Fellay or the SSPX on my forum. I've told you that before.
Since I've warned you once before on this, you're banned from the forum on this your 2nd offense.
You have "no use" for the SSPX, so I don't know why you even come around here on this SSPX board.
Matthew
|
.........................
Banned for slander against the SSPX leadership.
|
| Posted Aug 8, 2010, 6:23 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Wessex
Reputation: 903
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 523
|
Well, there is this gamble that Rome can right herself. But the passage of time is widening the odds of this happening. Which presents the Society with some serious head-scratching. Particularly, if Ratzinger's successor is a determined modernist.
|
|
| Posted Aug 8, 2010, 12:47 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
