Fr. Pfeiffer is in England and has invited himself one of the "Northern Missions" (see. https://respicestellam.wordpress.com/the-northern-mission/). Fr. King has refused to meet him and is staying away from The Liverpool mission tomorrow. This means that the Mass is going to be celebrated by Fr. Pfeiffer. This is pretty much a hostile takeover of the mission.

Quote from: Defender

Quote from: JimD

Fr. Pfeiffer is in England and has invited himself one of the "Northern Missions" (see. https://respicestellam.wordpress.com/the-northern-mission/). Fr. King has refused to meet him and is staying away from The Liverpool mission tomorrow. This means that the Mass is going to be celebrated by Fr. Pfeiffer. This is pretty much a hostile takeover of the mission.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Dear Fr Hewko,

This is in answer to your "word on the Street" report of a reported "Hostile Takeover" in Liverpool.

I am pleased to report that the Hostile Takeover is going well. We had 13 souls on Ignatian Retreat in Wales (devils complained of the Hostile takeover around the time of the general confessions of 5 hours duration. Due to contract requirements on our side details not to be released until the General Judgment. There are rumors that many reports of Hostile takeovers of a similar nature may be flooding the airwaves at that time. After the Retreat ended Saturday I went to visit some Faithful nearby in the resistance parish in Liverpool I established 3 years ago in early 2014. Fr King has been taking care of it most excellently for almost 2 years now. He will be celebrating His usual Mass later this Sunday evening on schedule so far as I know. Fr King wished myself and all retreatants well on our rereat and seems to be doing well in his Northern England Parishes. In Liverpool Mass was celebrated in the same hotel and same room where we celebrated the Masses multiple times 2 and 3 years ago. It was good to see some of the Faithful again. They appreciate very Much Fr King's faithful and good care of their souls during these past almost 2 years and hopefully for many years to come. I will celebrate Mass today in London and in Suffolk. The Hostile Takeover was inimical to the Devils in Liverpool. We fully support Fr King’s efforts to complete the hostile takeover of the Liverpool Mission from the clutches of the Devil. Must get back into the battlefield. Over and out,

In Christ the King,

Fr Joseph Pfeiffer

I hope nobody actually thinks this is a serious post. It is parody.

It is clearly a fake, for the following reasons:

It is written in such a bizarre fashion with a strange sense of humour (the way the author refers to hostile takeover). Talking about the rest of the resistance as the devil is another example. Father Pfeiffer would not do that. He is better than that. Also, childish language such as "over and out". It is clearly designed to discredit him.

Sorry, but we can't take this "letter" seriously.

It is written in such a bizarre fashion with a strange sense of humour (the way the author refers to hostile takeover). Talking about the rest of the resistance as the devil is another example. Father Pfeiffer would not do that. He is better than that. Also, childish language such as "over and out". It is clearly designed to discredit him.

Quote from: dutchtrad

It is written in such a bizarre fashion with a strange sense of humour (the way the author refers to hostile takeover). Talking about the rest of the resistance as the devil is another example. Father Pfeiffer would not do that. He is better than that. Also, childish language such as "over and out". It is clearly designed to discredit him.

You must not have ever met Fr. Pfeiffer.

He does indeed have a very good sense of humor and writes this way, as does Fr. Chazal also.

I would not be in the least bit surprised if the letter is authentically his and there is no scandal to be found between he and Fr. King, as stated.

I have not ever seen Father Peiffer write or send a letter to Father Hewko. He could call him primarily, perhaps even exclusively. The phone is Father's main means of contact. The letter's writing is also off in its voicing, This letter is more than likely bogus, a complete fabrication.

Quote from: ultrarigorist

Quote from: ManuelChavez

I have not ever seen Father Peiffer write or send a letter to Father Hewko. He could call him primarily, perhaps even exclusively. The phone is Father's main means of contact. The letter's writing is also off in its voicing, This letter is more than likely bogus, a complete fabrication.

..by Pablo the Hooligan. The letter is not off his voicing. Actually it's got his "DNA" all over it.

The letter is not from Father Pfeiffer, and I doubt it is from Pablo, as I have seen many of Pablo's writings in the last three years. None of the syntax matches well with either Pablo or Father Pfeiffer.

I have very strong doubts as to the veracity of this letter. If Father Pfeiffer had something to tell Father Hewko, he would call him. He would not write a letter or email. I am certain of this point.