Traditional Catholic forum - SSPX Resistance News - message board for Catholics

Traditional Catholic Forum

A message board for SSPX, Resistance and other Traditional Catholics to discuss news and matters pertaining to the Catholic Faith
Since 2006
New: RSS Feed

Click here to start your Amazon.com session so CathInfo gets credit!

Welcome! ( login | Register ) » Catholic Info » Traditional Catholic Faith » Catholic Living in the Modern World » Devils and civilization

Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll
Devils and civilization
Matto


Avatar



Reputation: 2737
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 5,077

Add Matto to your buddy list Send an email to Matto Send a personal messsage to Matto Ignore all posts by Matto  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Quote Go to the top of the page

What do you think about the idea that ancient civilizations were given their knowledge about how to start civiliazation by fallen angels who wished to corrupt mankind? What if demons taught mankind about agriculture and warfare and other things to try to corrupt mankind and the people who learned these secrets from the demons then in return came to worship these demons as gods? This is similar to the belief that the ancient civilizations were given their knowledge by aliens which helped them build the pyramids and do other things that seem unexplainable.
.........................
My Dream Blog: http://mattodreams.blogspot.com/

Posted Jan 10, 2017, 3:10 pm
Ignored by: 0
cassini





Reputation: 460
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 930

Add cassini to your buddy list Send an email to cassini Send a personal messsage to cassini Ignore all posts by cassini  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Quote Go to the top of the page

Matto said:
What do you think about the idea that ancient civilizations were given their knowledge about how to start civiliazation by fallen angels who wished to corrupt mankind? What if demons taught mankind about agriculture and warfare and other things to try to corrupt mankind and the people who learned these secrets from the demons then in return came to worship these demons as gods? This is similar to the belief that the ancient civilizations were given their knowledge by aliens which helped them build the pyramids and do other things that seem unexplainable.


There is no doubt that from the time of Adam & Eve the devils have been influencing mankind in many ways. This is Catholic teaching.

As regards astronomy and Egyptian pyramids, I am certain the bad angels gave them a knowledge that is to be found in their history.

Given there is no visual proof for their solar system, heliocentrism is conjured in the mind instead, and that had to be divulged to them by Satan so as to deceive the world from the very beginning.     
   
‘The people worshiped the sun, moon, and stars as gods, and a knowledge of their true nature would have at once put an end to the influence of the priests, who were believed by the ignorant and superstitious crowd to be able to withhold or dispense, by prayers, invocations, and sacrifices, the divine favor. The priest of a pretended god, when once his god is exposed, stands before the world a convicted impostor. To deny the divinity of the sun, moon, and stars, or, what was the same thing, to permit science to disclose their true nature to the masses of the people was consequently held by the priesthood of Egypt as the highest of crimes. By knowledge of astronomy the priests were able to calculate and to predict eclipses of the sun and moon, events beheld with superstitious awe and fear by the multitude. Seeing how certainly these pre-dictions, when thus made, were fulfilled, the priests were credited with the power to foretell other events, and to look into the future generally. So they cast horoscopes and assumed to be prophets.’ ---Robert Hewitt Brown: Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy, p.9. 

In the Holy Scriptures (3 Kings 16:31-33) we are told of Baal, the sun god of the Phoenicians, characterised by the most scandalously impure rites. Then there were the sun gods of the Canaanites and Mithraists of Persia. Sun worshipping is also condemned in 4 Kings: 23:5-11 and Wisdom: 13:2, the latter lesson repeated by St Paul where he writes ‘the circle of the stars, or the great water, or the sun and moon’ were created as witness to their Creator and not ‘to be the gods that rule the world.’(Romans 1:20)
    The mysteries then spread east to Egypt where they were taken up by those whose ambitions were to control the minds of the masses.

In 1837 when popes of the Catholic Church went along with their heliocentrism paganism returned to rule mankind. The mind-indoctrinations of the devils would now bring on long-ages, evolutionism and Modernism that became the ROCK upon which agnostism , naturalism, Modernism and atheism could be built. The Genesis of God's word was replaced with the origins compiled by the Egyptians and their devils.




Posted Jan 10, 2017, 4:56 pm
Ignored by: 0
cassini





Reputation: 460
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 930

Add cassini to your buddy list Send an email to cassini Send a personal messsage to cassini Ignore all posts by cassini  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Quote Go to the top of the page

Matto said:
What do you think about the idea that ancient civilizations were given their knowledge about how to start civiliazation by fallen angels who wished to corrupt mankind? What if demons taught mankind about agriculture and warfare and other things to try to corrupt mankind and the people who learned these secrets from the demons then in return came to worship these demons as gods? This is similar to the belief that the ancient civilizations were given their knowledge by aliens which helped them build the pyramids and do other things that seem unexplainable.


Finally, we could ask, how did they really find Neptune and Pluto?

Martin gwynne Writes:

‘As is shown from time to time in this book, the writings of secret society initiates are normally not the innovations they appear to be but the reproduction, at what is deemed to be an opportune moment, of traditional occult lore which has been used in the past. Much so-called modern science is of this nature. ‘Nothing under the sun is new: for it hath already gone before in the ages that were before us’ (Eccles. 1:10). What is the solution? Ruling out pure coincidence there are four possibilities.

(3) The third theory, which will be rejected by most readers but is in fact the most likely, is that the existence of Neptune has been known, presumably discovered by an earlier civilisation which possessed advanced technology, had been preserved in occult tradition, and was released to support Newton’s theory just as missing link fossils have been concocted to support Darwin’s evolutionary theory.
(4) The fourth possibility is that the position of Neptune was revealed directly by Satan to his followers. This too is not improbable. Satan has his limitations – he does not know the future and he cannot read our minds (except what he can guess from external observation) – but he certainly knows where the planets are.
    The circumstantial evidence, both negative and positive, in favour of one or the other of the last two possibilities is in fact surprisingly good. ............
The positive evidence is that we know for certain that there are occasions when bodies in the solar system are known about well before they are discovered. Of this inside knowledge we give two examples: The first concerns the two satellites of Mars, Deimos and Phobos. In the year 1720 Jonathan Swift’s famous work of fiction Gulliver’s Travels was published. In it Swift gave a remarkable description of two moons belonging to Mars, one of which he said was three diameters of Mars away from the centre of Mars and had a period of revolution of ten hours, and the other five diameters away with a period revolution of twenty-one and a half hours. More than one hundred and fifty years later, in the year 1877, it was discovered that Mars, which was until then thought to be on its own, did indeed have two satellites, so small that they were not observed until long after those of other planets (even of Neptune) had been discovered. Their respective distances from Mars and orbiting periods were just over two diameters and seven and a half hours and four diameters and thirty and quarter hours. Swift’s figures are not quite correct but anyone who imagines that he plucked the number of moons, and their distances and orbiting times out of his imagination is living in a world of fantasy. It is worth adding that Kepler too predicted two moons for Mars in 1610, his ostensible reason being that since the earth had one moon and Jupiter, at that time, had four, it was clearly logical to him that Mars must have two. Although this provides an excellent example of a wrong theory producing the right answer – once again we can suspect that what was published was not the real basis for Kepler’s prediction.’


N Martin Gwynne: Galileo versus the Geocentric Theory, Britons library, 1985, pp.21 and 32.

Posted Jan 10, 2017, 5:00 pm
Ignored by: 0
Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll E-mail me when replies are made to this topic View Printable