Anybody hear of them?

They condemn Cathinfo, Novus Ordo Watch, Tradition In Action, and Traditio. In this article, they go after Cathinfo.

"Cathinfo and Moderator Matthew Exposed..."

http://www.catholic-saints.net/cathinfo-exposed/

He is a heretic who believes all sɛҳuąƖ pleasure is evil, even within the bounds of sacramental marriage.

He believes that all sɛҳuąƖ relations must be "bare bones", utilitarian, done in the dark (so you don't see anything that might turn you on), and you must pray the whole time, and reject any pleasure that results.

He's a Puritan, Manichean heretic!

I don't really mind when people like that post crap about me; he can't have too many followers. A classic example of what kind of junk you can find on the Internet -- any kook with an opinion and some free time can start a website. I'd like to think that once most visitors see his game, and see that he is a heretic, they SHOULD understand why he has a problem with a Catholic like me.

Did I mention that he used to be protestant, a few short years ago? And yet as a new, ignorant convert he sets up a website to teach the world.

 

Last time he was here on CathInfo, I took him to task for his puerile obsession with sex. He's a single, unmarried layman. And he thinks he's "justified" to read every book he can get his hands on that talks about sex. Really, this crusade against sɛҳuąƖ pleasure is just an excuse for an unmarried layman to dwell on sɛҳuąƖ matters all the time -- because, when it comes right down to it, he's a psychological basketcase obsessed with sex.

I would say it's a form of "sour grapes". He can't find a wife, and it drives him insane on a daily basis, so he wants to "ruin it" for all the guys who are married. That's my amateur psychologist diagnosis :)

Quote

He's a Puritan, Manichean heretic!

With a garnishing of Albigensianism, it sounds like.

Yeah --

St. Dominic, pray for us.

As for his charge about the "ads", I'm not seeing it. Once in a while I see a dating site for Filipino/Russian/Asian/Latina/etc. women, and I add it to the blocked list. I can always block any immodest ads.

But I think HE was getting...how shall I say...MORE than the average share of immodest ads, because it is common knowledge that Google tailors the ads YOU see to YOUR OWN past website browsing behavior. If you just looked for an air conditioner on Google, you're going to start seeing ads for air conditioners on every site that uses Google ads. It happens all the time.

This man (Heitanen) complains about immodest ads, bikinis, makeup ads. You do the math.

It's funny, I never see any of those.

I'm not saying that they ONLY show up based on past browsing history (or I'd never see any! But I've seen some.), but they certainly tailor the ads to target what the viewer is most interested in. If they don't have something better or "custom" for a given user, they show a random/generic ad from the pile.

His muckraking about the ads is quite ridiculous. The ads he speaks about I added to the blocked list as fast as I could. Why dwell on the past, on something I was not at fault about, which I dealt with in a Catholic manner?

Jokes on him i would say.
If he is obstinate in his defiance
let him rot and pray for his soul.

Wow, I got quoted on his website. I should say about the immodest ads that for a while I was getting some immodest ads and sometimes I would tell Matthew about them so he could block them, but I haven't been getting any bad ads for a while now, so I am glad. I have no idea why but it is as it is.