Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Implicit Faith  (Read 7372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Disputaciones

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1667
  • Reputation: +472/-178
  • Gender: Male
Implicit Faith
« on: September 27, 2014, 12:38:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This ought to be of interest:

    Quote
    It may be asked, why they had not implicit faith, worshipping the true, though unknown, God?[5] 1st. because the worship of the true God can never exist with the worship of idols; 2nd. because an explicit faith in God is required of all; 3rd. because it is repugnant to implicit faith, to admit any thing contrary to it, as comparing this unknown God with the pagan idols; for God to be at all, must be one. Lucan towards the end of his 2nd book, hath these words:

    ----------Et dedita sacris

    Incerti Judæa Dei.

    --- What, therefore, you improperly worship, that I preach to you, and instruct you in the true worship, far different from what you pay to your strange gods.


    Commentary on Acts 17:23.


    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #1 on: November 11, 2014, 09:40:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No. An implicit faith is not sufficient. A person that has reached the age of reason, is obliged to profess an explicit belief in the Holy Trinity, The Incarnation, and the Catholic Faith before they die. This truth is necessary to believe for Salvation as a necessity of means.

     Pope Eugene IV Exultate Deo ex cathedra:
    Quote

     "Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all else to hold the Catholic Faith: unless each one preserve this whole and entire, he will without a doubt perish in eternity...then he defines the Holy Trinity, the Incarnation, and the necessity to believe in these truths...This is the Catholic Faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved."


    Again, an implicit faith / desire is not enough and furthermore, we are obliged to believe this truth. There is the necessity to explicitly believe and profess the Catholic Faith. Popes such as Pius X, Clement XI, Pius IX all have reaffirm and re-stated this dogma. BODers have fallen pray of liberal ideas and false notions such as "It goes without saying that if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him"as if God in His Infinite Mercy and Omnipotence could not send a missionary for those worthy souls that really seek Him... Watered down, lukewarm Catholics are the real enemies of the Faith and a real thread for the purity of it.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7611
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #2 on: November 12, 2014, 12:46:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Disputaciones
    This ought to be of interest:

    Quote
    It may be asked, why they had not implicit faith, worshipping the true, though unknown, God?[5] 1st. because the worship of the true God can never exist with the worship of idols; 2nd. because an explicit faith in God is required of all; 3rd. because it is repugnant to implicit faith, to admit any thing contrary to it, as comparing this unknown God with the pagan idols; for God to be at all, must be one. Lucan towards the end of his 2nd book, hath these words:

    ----------Et dedita sacris

    Incerti Judæa Dei.

    --- What, therefore, you improperly worship, that I preach to you, and instruct you in the true worship, far different from what you pay to your strange gods.


    Commentary on Acts 17:23.



    It is of interest to people struggling against Feeneyite infection.

    Explicit faith is required. That is the obligation. It goes without saying that if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him. This is a general principle of moral theology for sin in general.

    The Church's mission is to make faith explicit whether implicit faith exists or not:

    "Now he [Cornelius] had implicit faith, as the truth of the Gospel was not yet made manifest: hence Peter was sent to him to give him fuller instruction in the faith." - St. Thomas Aquinas


    There is No Such Thing as a 'Feeneyite'.... :sleep:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #3 on: November 12, 2014, 04:17:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Disputaciones
    This ought to be of interest:

    Quote
    It may be asked, why they had not implicit faith, worshipping the true, though unknown, God?[5] 1st. because the worship of the true God can never exist with the worship of idols; 2nd. because an explicit faith in God is required of all; 3rd. because it is repugnant to implicit faith, to admit any thing contrary to it, as comparing this unknown God with the pagan idols; for God to be at all, must be one. Lucan towards the end of his 2nd book, hath these words:

    ----------Et dedita sacris

    Incerti Judæa Dei.

    --- What, therefore, you improperly worship, that I preach to you, and instruct you in the true worship, far different from what you pay to your strange gods.


    Commentary on Acts 17:23.



    It is of interest to people struggling against Feeneyite infection.

    Explicit faith is required. That is the obligation. It goes without saying that if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him. This is a general principle of moral theology for sin in general.


    Your above reply demonstrates the Cushingite infection. It is the modernist Novus Ordo teaching that teaches "what you don't know can't hurt you."

    We are all bound to find out so as to merit reward, not choose to remain ignorant and merit reward any way.

    When we stand before God, we stand accused, not innocent. "O what shall I so guilty plead? and who for me will interceded? when even saints shall comfort need!" - Dies Irae  

    Quote from: Nado

    The Church's mission is to make faith explicit whether implicit faith exists or not:

    "Now he [Cornelius] had implicit faith, as the truth of the Gospel was not yet made manifest: hence Peter was sent to him to give him fuller instruction in the faith." - St. Thomas Aquinas


    St. Thomas is teaching that implicit faith does not suffice, if it did suffice, there would have been no need to send St. Peter (note that St. Peter didn't just happen along, he was sent).



    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #4 on: November 12, 2014, 11:08:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Inculpable ignorance of the True Faith excuses a soul from the sin of infidelity or heresy. But such ignorance has never been the means of salvation. From the fact that a person could potentially live a righteous life according to his conscience and not sin against the true Religion because of ignorance, many have drawn the false and heretical conclusion that such a soul is saved, or be granted sanctifying grace, thus making ignorance a means of salvation.

    The dogma of "Outside of the Church there is no salvation," means that no one can go to Heaven unless he is in the state of sanctifying grace and furthermore, that in order to receive sanctifying grace, the soul must be prepared for it by divine Faith. Baptism is the entrance to this spiritual life and the gateway for this development. This preparation of the soul cannot be brought by inculpable ignorance. Every Catholic must know and believe the truths of Salvation as well as receive the Sacraments dispensed by the Church to receive the necessary graces.

    According to the Angelic Doctor, God in His mercy will lead the worthy, righteous, well disposed souls, to the knowledge of the necessary truths of salvation, even send them an angel, if necessary, to instruct them, rather than let them perish without their fault. If they accept this grace, they will be saved as Catholics. Inculpable ignorance has never been a means of grace or salvation.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #5 on: November 12, 2014, 11:37:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Cantarella
    Inculpable ignorance of the True Faith excuses a soul from the sin of infidelity or heresy. But such ignorance has never been the means of salvation. From the fact that a person could potentially live a righteous life according to his conscience and not sin against the true Religion because of ignorance, many have drawn the false and heretical conclusion that such a soul is saved, or be granted sanctifying grace, thus making ignorance a means of salvation.


    You are absolutely correct. But you are arguing against Novus Ordo ecuмenism. This is a traditionalist forum. I have never seen anyone here say contrary to what you just said. So why are you saying it?


    Besides the Novus Ordo false ecuмenism, there is a Cushinguite error that many traditionalists share unfortunately which has been carried out in recent decades. This novel error is quite alive in traditionalist circles. Is this one: Salvation by Implicit Desire or Justification Alone that apply to non-Catholics that do not even hold the Catholic Faith, which is the foundation of all justification.

    The heretical 1949 Holy Office Letter that describes "the invincible ignorant" is the doctrinal foundation for the Prayer Meeting at Assisi. However, nobody wants to accept the widespread Cushing heresy which has plagued the entire world. This error of believing that a Jєω can be saved as a Jєω, a Muslim as a Muslim, a Hindu as a Hindu, without first converting to Catholicism and formally entering the Church (as if the invincible ignorant could actually ever be part of the "Soul of the Church") is shared by most traditionalists orders, the Vatican Curia, the Jєωιѕн Left, the Freemasons, etc etc .



    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #6 on: November 12, 2014, 03:21:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    We are all bound to find out so as to merit reward, not choose to remain ignorant and merit reward any way.


    The fact that you merely expressed the above shows you cannot comprehend the meaning of invincible ignorance. It is not a choice. Do you understand that?



    You said "if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him" - that is wrong. That is Cushingite infected, Novus Ordo inspired talk. That talk bespeaks "what you don't know can't hurt you" wherein one assumes no responsibility for their action or lack thereof - but rather is rewarded for their presumed inculpability.  



    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #7 on: November 12, 2014, 05:05:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    We are all bound to find out so as to merit reward, not choose to remain ignorant and merit reward any way.


    The fact that you merely expressed the above shows you cannot comprehend the meaning of invincible ignorance. It is not a choice. Do you understand that?



    You said "if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him" - that is wrong. That is Cushingite infected, Novus Ordo inspired talk. That talk bespeaks "what you don't know can't hurt you" wherein one assumes no responsibility for their action or lack thereof - but rather is rewarded for their presumed inculpability.  


    You didn't answer my question. You just posted one of my messages, and then responded to something else I said in another message (while distorting what I said with a strikeout).

    I asked a question. Do you know that invincible ignorance is not a choice?


    In the context you posted about, it is a choice.

    In case you didn't know, we are bound to find out what is required *and actually do, that which is required* and if we do not, we sin.

    Implicit faith conjures up all kinds of different crazy scenarios, like the case of the imaginary invincibly ignorant native on a desert island - don't get sucked in to it or before long, you will believe the CMRI dogma of "The Salvation of those outside the Church".

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #8 on: November 12, 2014, 05:18:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    We are all bound to find out so as to merit reward, not choose to remain ignorant and merit reward any way.


    The fact that you merely expressed the above shows you cannot comprehend the meaning of invincible ignorance. It is not a choice. Do you understand that?



    You said "if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him" - that is wrong. That is Cushingite infected, Novus Ordo inspired talk. That talk bespeaks "what you don't know can't hurt you" wherein one assumes no responsibility for their action or lack thereof - but rather is rewarded for their presumed inculpability.  


    You didn't answer my question. You just posted one of my messages, and then responded to something else I said in another message (while distorting what I said with a strikeout).

    I asked a question. Do you know that invincible ignorance is not a choice?


    Because the First Vatican Council taught:

    Quote
    14. To this witness is added the effective help of power from on high. For, the kind Lord stirs up those who go astray and helps them by his grace so that they may come to the knowledge of the truth [23] ; and also confirms by his grace those whom he has translated into his admirable light [24], so that they may persevere in this light, not abandoning them unless he is first abandoned.


    So, the graces of the omnipotent One and Triune God are compelling anyone towards the truth, that is, toward the Catholic Faith.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #9 on: November 13, 2014, 04:37:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: Nado
    Quote from: Stubborn
    We are all bound to find out so as to merit reward, not choose to remain ignorant and merit reward any way.


    The fact that you merely expressed the above shows you cannot comprehend the meaning of invincible ignorance. It is not a choice. Do you understand that?



    You said "if one is not culpably unaware of what is required, it is not held against him" - that is wrong. That is Cushingite infected, Novus Ordo inspired talk. That talk bespeaks "what you don't know can't hurt you" wherein one assumes no responsibility for their action or lack thereof - but rather is rewarded for their presumed inculpability.  


    You didn't answer my question. You just posted one of my messages, and then responded to something else I said in another message (while distorting what I said with a strikeout).

    I asked a question. Do you know that invincible ignorance is not a choice?


    In the context you posted about, it is a choice.

    In case you didn't know, we are bound to find out what is required *and actually do, that which is required* and if we do not, we sin.

    Implicit faith conjures up all kinds of different crazy scenarios, like the case of the imaginary invincibly ignorant native on a desert island - don't get sucked in to it or before long, you will believe the CMRI dogma of "The Salvation of those outside the Church".



    Wrong. Invincible ignorance is intrinsically NOT chosen. It is absolutely impossible for someone to choose to remain invincibly ignorant. That is such a fundamental that, if you don't understand it, you have no business talking about this subject at all.


    As confused as what you wrote was, invincible ignorance still does not forgive sin, nor does it negate sin or punishment due. We choose to be or remain invincibly ignorant when we reject the graces offered (see Jehanne's post above).

    Now you can debate that all day long if you want, but the Church teaches us that those who die in ignorance of the Church as the only course of salvific grace must be adjudged to have been culpably so. In a word, they did not know because they did not want to know.

    Again, read Jehanne's post above.

     
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Nishant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +0/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #10 on: November 13, 2014, 05:47:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No, no one can be saved without the Catholic Faith. This truth is itself an object of the Catholic Faith, is irreformable and dogmatically definable, is contained in innumerable Creeds, ( “Iniunctum nobis,” Pope Pius IV, “This true Catholic Faith, outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…", Nuper ad nos, Pope Benedict XIV, , March 16, 1743, Profession of Faith: “This Faith of the Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of my own accord I now profess and truly hold…”) taken by Roman Pontiffs with the greatest solemnity in public professions of the Faith, which it is the duty of St. Peter and his perpetual successors to guard.

    Quote from: Holy Office, Jan. 25, 1703
    “Q. Whether a minister is bound, before baptism is conferred on an adult, to explain to him all the mysteries of our Faith, especially if he is at the point of death, because this might disturb his mind. Or, whether it is sufficient, if the one at the point of death will promise that when he recovers from the illness, he will take care to be instructed, so that he might put into practice what has been commanded him.

        “A. A promise is not sufficient, but a missionary is bound to explain to an adult, even a dying one who is not entirely incapacitated, the mysteries of Faith which are necessary by a necessity of means, as are especially the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation.”


    Not even the express will to be Catholic therefore suffices when the intellect is ignorant or unenlightened about the primary mysteries of Faith necessary by a necessity of means, without which no one attains the beatific vision. No soul will ever enjoy the inexpressible bliss that comes from the sight of the Triune God in eternity unless in this life she has known and loved God one and Triune, and recognized the Lord Jesus Christ as the Incarnate Son of God and the sole Redeemer of the whole human race.

    Pope St. Pius X informs us,

    Quote from: Pope St. Pius X, Acerbo Nimis
    "We declare that a great number of those who are condemned to eternal punishment suffer that everlasting calamity because of ignorance of those mysteries of Faith which must be known and believed in order to be numbered among the elect."


    Fr. Mueller explains the teaching of all Tradition and the Church below, as do St. Thomas and St. Alphonsus, on how those in invincible ignorance and implicit faith, if they but persevere in doing what lies in their power with the help of actual grace that God gives them to know and believe the Truth by which they might be saved.

    Quote from: Familiar Explanation of Christian Doctrine by Rev. Michael Müller, C.SS.R.
    Q. What are we to think of the salvation of those who are out of the pale of the Church without any fault of theirs, and who never had any opportunity of knowing better?

    A. Their inculpable ignorance will not save them; but if they fear God and live up to their conscience, God, in His infinite mercy, will furnish them with the necessary means of salvation, even so as to send, if needed, an angel to instruct them in the Catholic Faith, rather than let them perish through inculpable ignorance.


    The text above has ecclesiastical and Roman approbation, including from the Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith. Fr. Michael Mueller, CSSR, who lived about a 100 years ago, was a true son of St. Alphonsus, as I will prove shortly, and his burning, fervent and lifelong desire ever since he landed on her shores, was to see America become Catholic. That is part of the reason he combated those who were teaching souls can be saved without the Catholic Faith, he and a friend of his, by the grace of God, bought thousands of souls to Christ and His Church.

    Quote from: St. Alphonsus
    we answer the Semipelagians, and say, that infidels who arrive at the use of reason, and are not converted to the Faith, cannot be excused ... St. Thomas explains it, when he says, that if anyone was brought up in the wilds, or even among brute beasts, and if he followed the law of natural reason, to desire what is good, and to avoid what is wicked, we should certainly believe either that God, by an internal inspiration, would reveal to him what he should believe, or would send someone to preach the Faith to him, as he sent Peter to Cornelius.  

    Thus, then, according to the Angelic Doctor, God, at least remotely, gives to infidels, who have the use of reason, sufficient grace to obtain salvation, and this grace consists in a certain instruction of the mind, and in a movement of the will, to observe the natural law; and if the infidel cooperates with this movement, observing the precepts of the law of nature, and abstaining from grievous sins, he will certainly receive, through the merits of Jesus Christ, the grace proximately sufficient to embrace the Faith, and save his soul.”


    This teaching is irreformable and definable, and in the wake of the Conciliar revolution, it acquires greater importance than it had a 100 or so years ago. If this teaching were solemnly reaffirmed tomorrow, it would be the beginning of the end of the Conciliar revolt against Catholic Tradition. Anyway, in the meanwhile, it is also contained in the infallible Athanasian Creed, and is the teaching of the Holy Bible and of all the Fathers, of all Sacred Scripture and of all Sacred Tradition from the very beginning of the Church, as even its few opponents admit (St. Alphonsus relates concerning the few who first began in the 16th and 17th centuries to seriously propose the novel opinion that a man might somewhere, somehow happen to be saved without the Catholic Faith, "They respond that even though all the Scriptures and Holy Fathers’ testimonies oppose this opinion, their opinion is more easily explained by necessity of precept, or because ordinarily almost none are saved without explicit faith in the mysteries") and should consequently be regarded by all traditional Catholics, who wish to hold to what the Church has always and everywhere held, as entirely beyond doubt and absolutely certain.

    Quote
    “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic Faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity. Now, the Catholic Faith is this, that we worship one God in the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity…But it is necessary for eternal salvation that he faithfully believe also in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ…the Son of God is God and man… This is the Catholic Faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.”
    "Never will anyone who says his Rosary every day become a formal heretic ... This is a statement I would sign in my blood." St. Montfort, Secret of the Rosary. I support the FSSP, the SSPX and other priests who work for the restoration of doctrinal orthodoxy and liturgical orthopraxis in the Church. I accept Vatican II if interpreted in the light of Tradition and canonisations as an infallible declaration that a person is in Heaven. Sedevacantism is schismatic and Ecclesiavacantism is heretical.


    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #11 on: November 13, 2014, 10:48:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado
    Invincible ignorance cannot be chosen. To choose it means that it automatically becomes vincible. So, what you are doing is denying that anyone can die invincibly ignorant that the Catholic Church is the true Church. You are denying something the Church has recognized as being true.


    What the First Vatican Council taught is that the omnipotent One and Triune God can overcome a person's "invincible" ignorance.  You are completely correct that there are folks who cannot overcome their ignorance, but if they cooperate with the graces of the Holy Spirit, then they will, by that grace, overcome their "invincible" ignorance.  What you are claiming is that there are individuals who could be in the presence of the Beatific Vision and yet still be "blind" to it, "through no fault of their own."  Such a claim is affront to the infinite God's sovereignty and blasphemous.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #12 on: November 13, 2014, 11:27:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote from: Nado
    Invincible ignorance cannot be chosen. To choose it means that it automatically becomes vincible. So, what you are doing is denying that anyone can die invincibly ignorant that the Catholic Church is the true Church. You are denying something the Church has recognized as being true.


    What the First Vatican Council taught is that the omnipotent One and Triune God can overcome a person's "invincible" ignorance.  You are completely correct that there are folks who cannot overcome their ignorance, but if they cooperate with the graces of the Holy Spirit, then they will, by that grace, overcome their "invincible" ignorance.  What you are claiming is that there are individuals who could be in the presence of the Beatific Vision and yet still be "blind" to it, "through no fault of their own."  Such a claim is affront to the infinite God's sovereignty and blasphemous.


    Well stated.
    Thanks Jehanne.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #13 on: November 13, 2014, 05:43:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado

    ignorance of the true Church is merely a prerequisite for non-Catholics to obtain the baptism of desire.


    This is a mistake. If hypothetical Baptism of Desire could ever apply (although is never visible to us) would be for catechumens ONLY who already have the Catholic Faith and die before receiving the water Baptism. Not any non-Catholic. This is because the Catholic Faith is the foundation of all justification.

    If you want to learn about BOD proper, ask Nishant who assuredly is not a "Feeneyite". Abstain from learning doctrine form schismatic cults such as CMRI, which propagate the modernist distortion of BOD. See, what the modern BOD adherents defend is not "Baptism of Desire" for catechumens. Far from. It is salvation by implicit desire of non Catholics who not even a belief in the Trinity or Incarnation.  A novel heretical doctrine.



    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Implicit Faith
    « Reply #14 on: November 14, 2014, 05:26:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nado

    The point is not whether God can take someone out of invincible ignorance. God can do anything. Remember, it is a doctrine that God does not force the free-will of any man. The point is, some people do die in the state of invincible ignorance of the true Church. That is what the Church says. Most of those who die in the state of invincible ignorance still die without baptism of desire (and sanctifying grace), and go to hell.


    Always try to remember that God created us for heaven, remember that none of us can make it there without His graces, remember that God knows that none of us will ever make it there without His graces - which is why He is ever ready to grant us all the graces we need because otherwise, we have no other way to get to heaven.

    Because of our free will, it is left entirely up to us whether we reject or accept and cooperate with those graces. Cushingites necessarily reject this teaching because if they accept it, they would have no leg to stand on regarding their teaching on salvation for the invincibly ignorant.

    If we reject those graces, we will certainly remain invincibly ignorant and go to hell when we die because we, of our own free will, *chose* to reject those graces necessary for us to come to know, love and serve God in this world through His Church, so we could be happy with Him in the next.

    Try to always remember that If God can arrange for you to be in the Church, by the very same Providence He can arrange for anyone else who desires or is willing to enter it. There is absolutely no obstacle to the invincible God's achieving His designs, except the intractable wills of His children.


    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse