Traditional Catholic forum - message board for Catholics

Traditional Catholic Forum

A place for SSPX and other Traditional Catholics to discuss matters pertaining to the Catholic Faith

Click here to start your Amazon.com session so CathInfo gets credit!

Welcome! ( login | Register ) » Catholic Info » Traditional Catholic Faith » Crisis in the Church » Married Deacons

Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll
Married Deacons
Capt McQuigg


Avatar




Reputation: 1229
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 2,037

Add Capt McQuigg to your buddy list Send an email to Capt McQuigg Send a personal messsage to Capt McQuigg Ignore all posts by Capt McQuigg  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

I personally think the very concept of a married man being a Deacon in the Catholic Church is a contradiction that can only end in ruin for the individual man. However, I think married deacons is a backdoor way for the novus ordo to allow priests to marry (the novus ordites dream of this but I don't think it would actually come to pass). A married man physically belongs to his wife and in her arms he will end up on a regular basis. But in the Traditional Catholic Church it's at the Subdeacon level that men make a vowel of celibacy (so, two levels later when they are ordained to the Holy Priesthood they have been celibate for a while). Everyone here knows this, but there may be one of two who don't.

However, my principal question is this:

Would a married deacon incur excommunication? Would he be in a state of mortal sin?



Posted Jul 11, 2012, 1:00 am
Ignored by: 0
songbird






Reputation: 516
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 777

Add songbird to your buddy list Send an email to songbird Send a personal messsage to songbird Ignore all posts by songbird  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

First of all you must know it is a sin. In the New Order what was a sin is no longer a sin. Eating meat on Friday was mortal sin. If you remain traditional, it is a mortal sin. Traditional have no married deacons.

Posted Jul 11, 2012, 3:52 am
Ignored by: 0
Sigismund


Avatar




Reputation: 2006
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 4,058

Add Sigismund to your buddy list Send an email to Sigismund Send a personal messsage to Sigismund Ignore all posts by Sigismund  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

The Eastern Churches have married deacons and priests aplenty, so I assume your are talking about married Latin rite priests. The real question here, I think, is this: Is the NO Church actually the Church? If it is (as I believe) then no one could be excommunicated for doing what the Church permits. If it is not, then there really isn't anyone around with jurisdiction to impose excommunication for anything. I suppose that if the 1917 Code says that if a married man is ordained a deacon he incurs excommunication, a trad case could be built for that, but I doubt that the 1917 Code addresses the question at all.

And before anyone asks, no, i do not think the discipline of celibacy for Latin rite priests should be changed.
.........................
Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spirit, and may not shrink from giving our lives for our brethren. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, Who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, one God, world without end. Amen.

Posted Jul 11, 2012, 4:32 am
Ignored by: 0
Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll View Printable