ServusSpiritusSancti
Reputation: 6390
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 8,222
|
| Seraphim said: | | Anyone who believes John Lane is an ally of Bishop Fellay in the matter of a sellout needs their head examined. |
No one ever said this.
Being a supporter of the other three Bishops yet defending Fellay is hypocritical enough, but a sedevacantist who does so?
Not to mention he put the blame on "home alone" sedevacantists rather than say anything negative about Bishop Fellay. He had no proof of his claim that the woman he was referencing was a home-aloner, yet here he is saying we have no proof that Fellay is a liar.
THAT is hypocritical.
|
.........................
This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or the faithful adhere to this new church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” -Abp. Lefebvre
|
| Posted Jul 3, 2012, 11:01 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Telesphorus
Reputation: 8215
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 11,814
|
| Quote: | | Horror of horrors: Yes, even Bishop Fellay is entitled to the benefits of the Church's teachings on detraction, calumny, and slander. |
John Lane accuses people of such sins recklessly. The critics of Bishop Fellay are in for the hardest criticism from Mr. Lane. Why is that? Those who have been defending Bishop Fellay and the SSPX generally, (though there are many good priests in it) despite the evidence accumulating over the years are the ones who have allowed things to reach this point.
| Quote: | | Anyone who believes John Lane is an ally of Bishop Fellay in the matter of a sellout needs their head examined. |
I wouldn't accuse him of being an ally of Bishop Fellay in the matter of the sellout - anymore than I would accuse him of being an ally of the SSPX in the matter of sedevacantism.
What is preposterous, is the belief that one can be a sede and against an SSPX sellout and not recognize that Bishop Fellay is 100% against your fundamental positions.
John Lane's position is absurd - condemning those he dislikes (for being right) as being slanderers strikes me as a holier than thou pose.
|
.........................
"I realized the desire of Rome to impose their ideas and their way of seeing. Cardinal Ratzinger always told me "But Monsignor, there is only one Church, it is not necessary to make a parallel church."
Which is this Church for him? The Conciliar Church, this is clear."
-Archbishop Lefebvre
|
| Posted Jul 5, 2012, 1:41 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Telesphorus
Reputation: 8215
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 11,814
|
| SpiritusSanctus said: | | THAT is hypocritical. |
Francisco had a great post about this problem:
| Francisco said: | About 15 years ago I said to an SSPX priest:
If I said such and such thing about you would you say that it would be calumny?
Yes, he answered.
And if you said the very same thing about me would that constitute calumny?
No, he retorted |
|
.........................
"I realized the desire of Rome to impose their ideas and their way of seeing. Cardinal Ratzinger always told me "But Monsignor, there is only one Church, it is not necessary to make a parallel church."
Which is this Church for him? The Conciliar Church, this is clear."
-Archbishop Lefebvre
|
| Posted Jul 5, 2012, 1:46 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
