morningstar
Reputation: 128
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 61
|
| songbird said: | What I see are couples who both have to work. We were military in the 70's and 80's. I stayed at home and I really budgeted! But with both couples having to work to get by is obvious. Another reason is the error of birth control. Low fertility to infertility is also a problem due to the STRESS of both working. There is more fear than faith in the couples hearts possibly. Everyone has their position to consider.
|
All the while GOD'S position which is neither changeable nor moveable, is scoffed and scorned. He will not be mocked!
|
|
| Posted Jul 1, 2012, 2:00 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Nadir
Reputation: 845
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 935
|
| CathMomof7 said: | It's simple. Because they can. Contraception makes it possible to not have children. Since that is possible, people don't.
Protestants no longer see any moral implications to contraception. In fact, they consider the use of contraception as responsible parenting.
Now most people don't think that the sexual act has anything to do, ultimately, with having children. Giving birth now is either a "choice" or a "lapse in responsibility."
Sad, but true.
|
CM7, I agree with everything you say here except for | Quote: | | Contraception makes it possible to not have children. |
Contraception does not necessarily stop women conceiving. Sometimes it works to stop ovulation, sometimes no. If ovulation occurs, conception is possible. In these cases it is not a contraceptive at all.
A healthy fertile woman having a normal sex life can conceive, on average, once per year while on the pill. So there is a built in mechanism which makes the womb an inhospitable place for a baby to nestle in and make its home for the rest of the pregnancy. That child is sloughed off without the knowlege of the woman. This is abortion and what is aborted? - a child, who misses the opportunity for Baptism. This significantly raises the abortion rate, doesn't it! And of course the more abortions the fewer surviving children.
Does anybody out there know of any other so-called medication, whose express purpose is the rendering of a disability in women?
|
|
| Posted Jul 1, 2012, 3:49 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Marcelino
Reputation: 355
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 1,418
|
| Nadir said: | | CathMomof7 said: | It's simple. Because they can. Contraception makes it possible to not have children. Since that is possible, people don't.
Protestants no longer see any moral implications to contraception. In fact, they consider the use of contraception as responsible parenting.
Now most people don't think that the sexual act has anything to do, ultimately, with having children. Giving birth now is either a "choice" or a "lapse in responsibility."
Sad, but true.
|
CM7, I agree with everything you say here except for | Quote: | | Contraception makes it possible to not have children. |
Contraception does not necessarily stop women conceiving. Sometimes it works to stop ovulation, sometimes no. If ovulation occurs, conception is possible. In these cases it is not a contraceptive at all.
A healthy fertile woman having a normal sex life can conceive, on average, once per year while on the pill. So there is a built in mechanism which makes the womb an inhospitable place for a baby to nestle in and make its home for the rest of the pregnancy. That child is sloughed off without the knowlege of the woman. This is abortion and what is aborted? - a child, who misses the opportunity for Baptism. This significantly raises the abortion rate, doesn't it! And of course the more abortions the fewer surviving children.
Does anybody out there know of any other so-called medication, whose express purpose is the rendering of a disability in women? |
Are you sure? Does the pill really do that?
|
.........................
It is easier to stir up vice, than virtue.
I like to say acts of contrition for people, when i think they need them and might not be saying them for themselves :-)
|
| Posted Jul 1, 2012, 5:07 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
