Chus Brea
Reputation: 21
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 20
|
| Capt McQuigg said: | Remember too that Jesus of Nazareth could rightfully be called the God of the Jews too because He's part of the Holy Trinity. The opening of the Last Gospel makes it clear that in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. I'm paraphrasing because I'm at work and don't have my books all opened in front of me...
We don't rely on the Jews and their tribal history as much as the Jews like to think we do. Jesus, through the Father, was a co-creator of the Israelites and handed the Law to Moses. The Jewish people are traditionally just sacred satchel carriers. Sure, they carried the bag for centuries but just like Our Blessed Redeemer told the Jews that God could raise children of Abraham from the stones at their feet, so too could God have designated any other people to prepare the way for the coming of the Lord.
That website, if it wants to make an argument against sedevacantism, should stick to issues closer to home in the Roman Catholic World and not unnecessarily promote the false grandeur of the Jewish people, who are really to be pitied. I know they are haters and I know they've done much evil and will continue to do so but many of them should be pitied. All of them should be prayed for.
Traditional Catholicism should not carry around the bag full of filth known as philo-semitism that is rampant in the novus ordo catholic world and is overbearing in the world of evanglical protestantism.
|
I thought that I could even live with Assisi and the New Mass and not consider the SV thesis. But the turning point for me was precisely the N.O Good Friday prayer for the jews. I mean how could the Holy Catholic Church's universal discipline mandate to pray a heretical prayer every year? that even trumps the heresies these VII popes might have professed.
What amazes me the most is that even some so called traditional catholics defend the prayer calling it merely an "ambiguous" prayer at best. It is NOT ambiguous, it is only ambiguous to those who want to force an orthodox interpretation on it.
|
|
| Posted Jun 29, 2012, 12:10 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
RomanCatholic1953
Reputation: 595
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 1,686
|
From a well known commentator that reads jewish publications,
admits that 50% that attend synagogue services are atheists.
In St.Paul's time that was not the case, and he could preached
to attempt to convert them.
Today, the synagogue is just an agenda setting forum in
what liberal, and socialist policies to follow and pursue.
|
|
| Posted Jun 29, 2012, 2:36 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
theology101
Reputation: 110
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 332
|
| RomanCatholic1953 said: | The difference is in simple to understand english is that St.Paul went into
the Synagogue to attempt to convert the Jews. John Paul II and Benedict
XVI entered the Synagogue and did not attempt to convert the Jews,
but appears that he participated with their worship, and validated the concept
that the Jews old covenant is still in force. |
Eggsactly. Few people remember that the very first thing the Apostles were sent to do was to convert the Jews. They were only sent to the Gentiles after the continued obstinacy of the (real) Jews. REAL Jews, Semitic descendants of Abraham, still exist and are our brothers, though they still need to be converted. Most "Jews" of today however aren't even Semites, let alone descendants of Abraham.
Semites: Arabs, Syriac Christians (of Aramaic descent), Mhallami, many Jordanians (Moabites), Maronites, a handful of Africans (Shebans), and Maltese.
Jews: People of any race, ethnicity, color or creed who follow the modern "Jewish" religion.
Israelites: Actual real Jews.
|
|
| Posted Jul 3, 2012, 4:49 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
