Guest
Unregistered
|
A priest friend called me last night to say that Fr Peter Scott in Canada has been forbidden by his district superior to comment on the Rome-SSPX agreement. True, it has come to my ears from a priest, but that does not mean that it is not a rumour. Unless, of course, it is another Menzingenite-Rostandite type of rumour which means that it is true .....
|
|
| Posted Jun 19, 2012, 6:50 am |
|
|
|
|
Guest
Unregistered
|
| Guest said: | | A priest friend called me last night to say that Fr Peter Scott in Canada has been forbidden by his district superior to comment on the Rome-SSPX agreement. True, it has come to my ears from a priest, but that does not mean that it is not a rumour. Unless, of course, it is another Menzingenite-Rostandite type of rumour which means that it is true ..... |
What these obsessively controlling, manipulative, domineering priests in Bishop Fellay's orbit need to have repeated to them ceaselessly until they humbly submit and desist from their errors and step down from their positions is that they is that they have absolutely no right and no authority to prevent any priest from telling the truth about the attempt to put the SSPX under the control of neo-modernists.
|
|
| Posted Jun 19, 2012, 6:53 am |
|
|
|
|
ggreg
Reputation: 410
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 473
|
Father Peter Scott silenced Fr. John Rizzo back in the winter of 1993. Over raising objections to abuses going on at SSPX schools. This silencing attitude has long existed in the SSPX. The priests who have dished it out for years, now find themselves on the receiving end.
|
|
| Posted Jun 19, 2012, 8:04 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
