Traditional Catholic forum - message board for Catholics

Traditional Catholic Forum

A place for SSPX and other Traditional Catholics to discuss matters pertaining to the Catholic Faith

Click here to start your Amazon.com session so CathInfo gets credit!

Welcome! ( login | Register ) » Catholic Info » Traditional Catholic Faith » Crisis in the Church » Why no conclave by sedevacant...

Pages: << prev ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ... next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll
Why no conclave by sedevacantists?, "Waiting for a miracle"?!
MyrnaM


Avatar




Reputation: 1379
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 2,919

Add MyrnaM to your buddy list Send an email to MyrnaM Send a personal messsage to MyrnaM Ignore all posts by MyrnaM  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Quote:
So funny to see the sedes grasping at straws......


Funnier to see brainglitch sticking his head in the sand...
.........................
I Am the Lord Thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me.

Posted Jun 2, 2012, 7:25 pm
Ignored by: 0
ServusSpiritusSancti






Reputation: 6464
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 8,142

Add ServusSpiritusSancti to your buddy list Send an email to ServusSpiritusSancti Send a personal messsage to ServusSpiritusSancti Ignore all posts by ServusSpiritusSancti  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

branglitch said:
However, Archbishop Lefebvre also said that we cannot pass judgment on the duly elected Vicar of Christ. I think I'll take his judgment over yours.


Proper interpretation of ABL's words is key, and none of the Fellay supporters know how to interpret his words (if they did, they wouldn't be be Fellay supporters in the first place because they would know ABL wouldn't want to "reconcile" with modernist Rome").

You're practically painting ABL as a man who despised sedevacantism. That is not the case. For example, he once said this:

Quote:
...So it is possible that we may be obliged to believe this Pope is not the Pope.


It is true that ABL never embraced sedevacantism. But he sure didn't think the position was schismatic.

Posted Jun 2, 2012, 8:47 pm
Ignored by: 0
Capt McQuigg


Avatar




Reputation: 1238
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 2,054

Add Capt McQuigg to your buddy list Send an email to Capt McQuigg Send a personal messsage to Capt McQuigg Ignore all posts by Capt McQuigg  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

brainglitch said:
Capt McQuigg said:
brainglitch said:
roscoe said:
Anyone can find pictures of the anti-pope Benedict flashing the el diablo masonic hand sign. They have been posted in this Forum.  2 + 2 =4


That does not constitute proof of Freemasonry. Friends of mine (stupid friends mostly) have flashed that at rock concerts. Didn't make them masons. Most people don't know the underlying meaning of it, or don't care.


Are you a novus ordite?

I agree that one photo does not constitute proof, far from it actually.  However,in addition to everything else, from his running around in mufti during the actual Vatican II council days to his having been under suspicion of heresy by Pope Pius XII to his being a big fan of some excommunicated theologians... 

...It sure doesn't look kosher to me.



I don't attend the novu ordo anymore. It is sacriligious and a concoction of hell itself.

None of what you have cited constitutes reliable proof of Freemasonic membership.

So funny to see the sedes grasping at straws......


I wasn't trying to provide you with proof.

You read the rest of what I wrote, I hope.


Posted Jun 3, 2012, 4:39 am
Ignored by: 0
Pages: << prev ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ... next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll View Printable