Traditional Catholic forum - message board for Catholics

Traditional Catholic Forum

A place for SSPX and other Traditional Catholics to discuss matters pertaining to the Catholic Faith

Click here to start your Amazon.com session so CathInfo gets credit!

Welcome! ( login | Register ) » Catholic Info » Traditional Catholic Faith » Crisis in the Church » Why no conclave by sedevacant...

Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll
Why no conclave by sedevacantists?, "Waiting for a miracle"?!
Klaus






Reputation: 17
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 80

Add Klaus to your buddy list Send an email to Klaus Send a personal messsage to Klaus Ignore all posts by Klaus  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Someone said that the reason sedevacantists don't hold a conclave is that they are waiting for a miracle. This seems very strange, and to owe more to Pentecostalism than Catholicism.

If there are X number of sedevacantist bishops in the world, and no more, surely those bishops have a duty to organise to appoint a successor to whoever they believe the last bishop of Rome was? If the Soviets had nuked St Peter's during Vatican II, taking out all the cardinals and left only a handful of bishops, are we saying that the remaining bishops would have sat on their hands and waited for a miracle, rather than organising to appoint a new pope?

Posted May 22, 2012, 2:35 pm
Ignored by: 0
This member is currently online Telesphorus






Reputation: 8251
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 11,721

Add Telesphorus to your buddy list Send an email to Telesphorus Send a personal messsage to Telesphorus Ignore all posts by Telesphorus  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

Klaus said:
Someone said that the reason sedevacantists don't hold a conclave is that they are waiting for a miracle. This seems very strange, and to owe more to Pentecostalism than Catholicism.


There's nothing strange about it.  To have a conclave there must be the proper conditions to hold a conclave.  There must be more understanding and acknowledgement of the problem, and less confusion.  The conditions must be right.

It's not strange to believe in miracles.  It is strange to believe a Pope can be Pope and publicly deny them.

Quote:
If there are X number of sedevacantist bishops in the world, and no more, surely those bishops have a duty to organise to appoint a successor to whoever they believe the last bishop of Rome was? If the Soviets had nuked St Peter's during Vatican II, taking out all the cardinals and left only a handful of bishops, are we saying that the remaining bishops would have sat on their hands and waited for a miracle, rather than organising to appoint a new pope?


They don't have any duty to do what is not in their power.

Benedict XVI must be the Pope because sedes bishops at this time do not believe they have authority to call a conclave.

Pure nonsense and sophistry.

Being Pope depends on not being manifestly a heretic.
.........................
"I realized the desire of Rome to impose their ideas and their way of seeing. Cardinal Ratzinger always told me "But Monsignor, there is only one Church, it is not necessary to make a parallel church."

Which is this Church for him? The Conciliar Church, this is clear."

-Archbishop Lefebvre

Posted May 22, 2012, 2:48 pm
Ignored by: 0
s2srea


Avatar




Reputation: 2621
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 4,118

Add s2srea to your buddy list Send an email to s2srea Send a personal messsage to s2srea Ignore all posts by s2srea  people like this post0      people dislike this post0 Reply with a quote from this post Go to the top of the page

If you're unable to state those 'conditions' perhaps someone else may? Surely its not that vague.


.........................
Fr, Réginald Marie Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.:
"The Church is intolerant in principle because she believes; she is tolerant in practice because she loves. The enemies of the Church are tolerant in principle because they do not believe; they are intolerant in practice because they do not love."

Posted May 22, 2012, 2:50 pm
Ignored by: 0
Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... next >> Reply to Topic Create New Topic Create New Poll View Printable