KofCTrad
Reputation: 46
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 61
|
One thing that sort of puzzles me but not totally because I understand Fatima is an extraordinary revelation and not directly tied to the Faith but a warning and prophecy. But nevertheless, if you're going to give preliminary requests, stipulations, demands, whatever before beginning talks with the usurpers in the Vatican why not really put their fannies to the fire, back them against the wall, and find out once and for all if they are who many suspect they are, usurpers.
Why not make a stipulation that the SSPX wants the Third Part of the secret that begins, "In Portugal the Dogma of the Faith will always be preserved etc..." In order to insure the goodwill of the Romans. Surely, they have nothing to hide, right? They're legit, right? and Our Lady said it should be released to the whole world in 1960, right?
So what's the problem, RIGHT?
|
|
| Posted Mar 9, 2012, 3:06 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
bernadette
Reputation: 462
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 333
|
If the "Third Secret" were to be finally revealed it would take a great deal of the punch out of the SSPX...if you solve a mystery, what's left? Nothing. The third secret of Fatima has been a huge part of the preaching, prayer and rosary campaign in the SSPX. And the bottom line is that it is not an article of faith that any Catholic must believe in private revelation.
|
|
| Posted Mar 9, 2012, 3:25 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
KofCTrad
Reputation: 46
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 61
|
| bernadette said: | | If the "Third Secret" were to be finally revealed it would take a great deal of the punch out of the SSPX...if you solve a mystery, what's left? Nothing. The third secret of Fatima has been a huge part of the preaching, prayer and rosary campaign in the SSPX. And the bottom line is that it is not an article of faith that any Catholic must believe in private revelation. |
" it would take a great deal of the punch out of the SSPX.."
How do you figure that?
From all I've read and studied of it I've come to believe that it may actually use the words "anti-pope" and "evil council" in the text its self. That's why it's not released.
One night on Art Bell's radio show the topic of the third secret came up. People were calling up to guess what's in it. Malichi would confirm if something similar was in the secret. One person suggested that the secret foretold of, "a pope under the influence of Satan." Malichi answered, "Art, THAT SOUNDS VERY CLOSE TO IT." I'de love to find which interview that was. I'm not mis-remembering. I'm 98% certain that's the exact exchange. What could be "VERY CLOSE" to a pope under the influence of Satan? An anti-pope perhaps?
"Fr. Kramer revealed that he had spoken with an old Bavarian priest who was very well known to St. Padre Pio and was also a friend of Cardinal Ratzinger.
This priest told Fr. Kramer that Cardinal Ratzinger had informed him some years ago that the text of the Third Secret referred to “an evil Council” in the Church and a warning from heaven about the suicide of altering the liturgy.
When this information failed to materialise with the Vatican’s year 2000 publication of what it said was the entire Secret, this Bavarian priest, who had just concelebrated a Mass with Cardinal Ratzinger, asked him in the sacristy what had happened. The Cardinal admitted to him that not everything had been revealed.
This was astounding information which I had never heard before and it came from an authoritive source. These priests are not lying. They only repeat what they have heard from authoritive and absolutely trustworthy sources."
From:
http://www.catholictruthscotland.com/blog/2009/09/target-scotland-fantastic-fatima-conference-thank-you-fr-gruner-thank-you-fr-kramer/
|
|
| Posted Mar 9, 2012, 3:54 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
