ServusSpiritusSancti
Reputation: 6719
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 8,298
|
Yeah, rows clearly isn't Traditional. Just because the Vatican gave him a "dispensation" does not mean that Fr. Malachi Martin was worthy of it. You obviously aren't aware of what went on during Vatican II. Here's a scary quote from Paul VI.
Paul VI told the U.N. assembly in New York, Mar. 6, '67: "Your vocation is to bring not just some people, but all people together as brothers. [ ! ] Who can fail to see the need and importance of thus gradually coming to the establishment of a 'world authority' capable of taking effective action on the juridical and political plane. Delegates to international organization, public officials, gentlemen of the press, teachers and educators, all of you, must realize that you have your part to play in the construction of a NEW WORLD ORDER."
|
|
| Posted Aug 2, 2011, 3:43 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Elizabeth
Reputation: 1544
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 4,162
|
| rowsofvoices9 said: | | Elizabeth said: | | SpiritusSanctus said: | | Ignoring roscoe (as usual), I'm going to guess rows that you aren't fully Traditional given that last comment you made about satan being enthroned. You must realize that satan was not enthroned in the Catholic Church. The church he was enthroned in was the anti-church, run by Freemasons. Vatican II is not a Catholic council. It can't be. It rejected the Catholic dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. How can it be Catholic? So, the enthronement of satan was entirely possible and likely considering it was not the Catholic Church he was enthroned into. |
Yes.
And whereas Rows may have forgotten about The Church Militant, The Church Suffering, and The Church Triumphant, Malachi Martin never did. |
Elizabeth I haven't for one moment forgotten about the above. I referred to Malachi Martin as Mr. because of the following. Maybe I should have addressed him as Dr. Martin.
Here's what the Vatican says about him:
"In 1965, Mr. Martin received a dispensation from all privileges and obligations deriving from his vows as a Jesuit and from priestly ordination." [Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, 25 June 1997, Prot. N. 04300/65]."
|
Please forgive me for saying you might have forgotten.
I believe there are various types of dispensations and arrangements. I can't bring myself to fight with you right now...I'm in my happy place. 
I still love Malachi Martin, though, so see ya later alligator.
|
|
| Posted Aug 2, 2011, 3:52 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
gladius_veritatis
Reputation: 1187
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 6,510
|
Actually, there are certain priestly obligations from which there can be no dispensation...Tu es sacerdos in aeternum...secundum ordinem Melchisedech...
Who cares what Modernists did or did not do in 1965?
|
.........................
+ Vincit veritas +
|
| Posted Aug 2, 2011, 6:37 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
