monkofspain
Reputation: 10
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 5
|
| Anticlimax said: | | Belloc said: | | Anticlímax said: | | SpiritusSanctus said: | | Anticlímax said: | Clearly, the moral decay, especially among the popes of the Renaissance, and the idolatry of Scholastic culminated in the perversion of Catholic doctrine in heresies that only sustained criticism from those who saw that besides the unwillingness of some popes, there was the whisper of Satan. Antipope Pius V was only the first of the anti-augustinian heretics, which is also added to the modern apostates.
The wrath of Pope Paul IV represented nothing more than the awakening of his conscience before the suspicion of infidelity to Christ. The Holy Spirit certainly alerted him to take some steps. What about Pope Pius IV, it is clear that he acted with caution, so he sentenced Michael Bayus to keep silent so that we can not say that Pius IV acted entirely wrong. I believe that Pius IV represented a transition, if that can be imagined, since he was a legitimate pope. However, unlike his predecessor, Pius V made concessions with Satan. |
Where in the world did you get the crazy idea that Pius V made concessions with Satan? The Pope who helped create the Traditional Latin Mass made concessions with Satan? Please! |
Only a demon could want to plaster the liturgy. The Traditional Latin Mass is a pantomime for the blind. |
the TLM did not start with Pius V idiot....plaster? how, what way? plaster what?
ravings of a mad man
again, boss, you are found out, raoul et all have your number, kooky for coca puffs fellow |
Why do you act like you\\\\\\\'re intellectually disadvantaged? You know I do not say that! Or this is childish, or you are very malicious. |
Anti-Climax,
I must say, these users on this forum are not too bright because if they were they would have realized that you are not who you say you are. Your writing is specifically similar to a forum user who was banned no too long ago. You speak like Augustine\\\\\\\'s Great Catholic Monarch in which you should be banned, but there is no way for I to know who you are or anything so I can only sit here and listen to your stupid replies . Your beliefs defy logic, they defy normal common sense! You believe that Post-Vatican II church was all wrong and heretical, that means your Vat II is as well heretical! And by your beliefs that would mean the son of God Lord Jesus Christ was heretical as well thus meaning you are a fool due to the fact you belief the most outlandish thing any of these forum users and I have ever heard of. It is unimaginable to know why you believe this and how you had come to the solution.
By the way, Pope Augustine told me he wants to speak with you. He said he will refute you like he refuted Glenn D.
|
.........................
Sincerely,
Monk of Spain
|
| Posted Jul 31, 2010, 7:27 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
ServusSpiritusSancti
Reputation: 6410
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 8,229
|
| monkofspain said: | | Anticlimax said: | | Belloc said: | | Anticlímax said: | | SpiritusSanctus said: | | Anticlímax said: | Clearly, the moral decay, especially among the popes of the Renaissance, and the idolatry of Scholastic culminated in the perversion of Catholic doctrine in heresies that only sustained criticism from those who saw that besides the unwillingness of some popes, there was the whisper of Satan. Antipope Pius V was only the first of the anti-augustinian heretics, which is also added to the modern apostates.
The wrath of Pope Paul IV represented nothing more than the awakening of his conscience before the suspicion of infidelity to Christ. The Holy Spirit certainly alerted him to take some steps. What about Pope Pius IV, it is clear that he acted with caution, so he sentenced Michael Bayus to keep silent so that we can not say that Pius IV acted entirely wrong. I believe that Pius IV represented a transition, if that can be imagined, since he was a legitimate pope. However, unlike his predecessor, Pius V made concessions with Satan. |
Where in the world did you get the crazy idea that Pius V made concessions with Satan? The Pope who helped create the Traditional Latin Mass made concessions with Satan? Please! |
Only a demon could want to plaster the liturgy. The Traditional Latin Mass is a pantomime for the blind. |
the TLM did not start with Pius V idiot....plaster? how, what way? plaster what?
ravings of a mad man
again, boss, you are found out, raoul et all have your number, kooky for coca puffs fellow |
Why do you act like you\\\\\\\'re intellectually disadvantaged? You know I do not say that! Or this is childish, or you are very malicious. |
Anti-Climax,
I must say, these users on this forum are not too bright because if they were they would have realized that you are not who you say you are. Your writing is specifically similar to a forum user who was banned no too long ago. You speak like Augustine\\\\\\\'s Great Catholic Monarch in which you should be banned, but there is no way for I to know who you are or anything so I can only sit here and listen to your stupid replies . Your beliefs defy logic, they defy normal common sense! You believe that Post-Vatican II church was all wrong and heretical, that means your Vat II is as well heretical! And by your beliefs that would mean the son of God Lord Jesus Christ was heretical as well thus meaning you are a fool due to the fact you belief the most outlandish thing any of these forum users and I have ever heard of. It is unimaginable to know why you believe this and how you had come to the solution.
By the way, Pope Augustine told me he wants to speak with you. He said he will refute you like he refuted Glenn D. |
I already realize that AntiClimax may very well not be who he says he is. The person you're speaking of that got banned probably got banned before I even signed up here. I don't know every single member that has posted here throughout the years.
By the way, AntiClimax was talking about the pre-VII Church being heretical. Is that what you meant to put? Because you put post-VII, although the post-VII Church is heretical.
|
.........................
This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or the faithful adhere to this new church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” -Abp. Lefebvre
|
| Posted Jul 31, 2010, 7:54 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
