Clint

Reputation: 299
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 163
|
Excellent comment from a Canada donor posting at SaveSSPX.com:
| Quote: | | From the West . . Given all the emails, postings, and utube speeches there is one missing element. Surprisingingly, NOT ONE, VATICAN II priest, bishop, or cardinal has spoken out against the Agreement betweeen SSPX and the Vatican - not only this anomoly, not one Jewish group has offered their comments. Isn't this unusual ? . . . When the so called excommunication was lifted, hundreds of INET postings from both Vatican II priests, bishops and Cardinals were posted on the INET for months, and the Jewish groups stepped in to offer their comments and even went to Rome to see the Pope about reversing his decision. Now with this reality as recorded history, Why in God's good name are all these groups, priests and Vatican II Prelates silent ? . . Can anybody answer this question ? Please do. The answer is, all thining persons with common sense well know that the pending Agreement will end SSPX and Catholic Tradition, and this is what they want. It is that simple. What else could this pssibly mean ? Nobody has brought this point forward and this silence is, as the good Bishop Fellay has said many times, reading between the lines . . . Wake up people. What will you do when Vatican II priests are called to give Mass at your parish ? What then, and who is going to stop them ? By that time it will be all over. |
and from another:
| Quote: | | Excellent comments all around. The one post about the DEAFENING silence from Vatican II bishops, cardinals, the Curia, the Jews, and all the other usual suspects about the pending agreement is fascinating and terrrifying. Napoleon once wrote that a critical battle tactic was this: NEVER INTERRUPT YOUR ENEMY WHEN HE IS MAKING A MISTAKE. That, my friends, is why you have SILENCE on so many fronts with this pending agreement. The liberals, the modernists, the Jews, the masonically-saturated Curia, they all KNOW the SSPX is walking into a TRAP, and nary a peep is allowed. Do not interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. Period. |
|
|
| Posted Jun 21, 2012, 2:18 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Telesphorus

Reputation: 8204
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 11,800
|
Yes, excellent comments.
The pro-agreement crowd in these chapels are tired of the perceived burdens of being traditionalist and generally don't understand what's at stake.
|
......................... "I realized the desire of Rome to impose their ideas and their way of seeing. Cardinal Ratzinger always told me "But Monsignor, there is only one Church, it is not necessary to make a parallel church."
Which is this Church for him? The Conciliar Church, this is clear."
-Archbishop Lefebvre
|
| Posted Jun 21, 2012, 2:30 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Telesphorus

Reputation: 8204
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 11,800
|
Another excellent comment:
| Quote: | | It is well known that there is a radical group in the Post Conciliar church that wants to take the Vatican II Revolution forward. The SSPX, as the largest Traditionalist group, is an obstacle to their hidden agenda. Once the SSPX is neutralized through absorption by the Post Conciliar church, Catholics right round the world may be in grave danger of the consequences of this forward-carried Revolution which may finally destroy their Faith in favor of the New One World Religion. Has Bishop Fellay taken into account this possibility and does he realize what harm he may be doing to the whole of Christendom by making common cause with the Post Conciliar church? |
Here we have Benedict XVI recently approving of the use of condoms as a "first step in morality" and the SSPX leadership barely responds to it, just sort of brushes is it aside.
Yes, when the SSPX is absorbed the next round of radical changes can begin, with no opposition.
Do you really think Bishop Fellay, the sort of man who would hire that Zionist, would do anything to stop the SSPX from being utterly corrupted?
Wake up!
|
......................... "I realized the desire of Rome to impose their ideas and their way of seeing. Cardinal Ratzinger always told me "But Monsignor, there is only one Church, it is not necessary to make a parallel church."
Which is this Church for him? The Conciliar Church, this is clear."
-Archbishop Lefebvre
|
| Posted Jun 21, 2012, 2:34 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|