Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Mithrandylan, but about allegedly traditional Catholic forums in general.  (Read 53396 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PatrickG

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Reputation: +165/-0
  • Gender: Male
Mithrandylan - here we go:
http://www.suscipedomine.com/forum/index.php?topic=2547.0
They don't seem to like the URL - you'll have to edit in the name yourself!
I've posted as you asked - it's a pleasure. I hope I didn't pull any punches.

This led me on to a more general thought about 'Catholic' forums - are they singled out for attacks by the Devil? The gruesome abomination on Fish Eaters is the most obvious, but crypto-feminism and feminism (here, I will say it plainly, erin is nice, Penelope and others) on S.D. as well as neo-Catholics running about (poche, Older Salt, Cool Cat) unchecked on both are  very pernicious.

I expect the Devil does single out organs of resistance, whether as petty as a forum or as once great as the SSPX, to fight and attempt to destroy.
Old-fashioned is good, modern is suicidal.
- Bishop Richard N. Williamson.


Offline PatrickG

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Reputation: +165/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wonder now if it was quite gentlemanly to criticise another forum on this one, so I am sorry. The original purpose stands.
    Old-fashioned is good, modern is suicidal.
    - Bishop Richard N. Williamson.


    Offline Hatchc

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 521
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PatrickG
    I wonder now if it was quite gentlemanly to criticise another forum on this one, so I am sorry. The original purpose stands.


    No it's good. I know the thread you're referencing.

    They fly the traditional Catholic banner. It's all fair.

    I consider the rule on Sussscipppe Dominnne and Fisheaters against criticizing other forums to be a pharisaical one. One, because if a forum is claiming to be Catholic while spreading error it has no right to protection. Two, both Vox Clamantis and Kaesekopf enforce this rule with inconsistency. They like the rule when it protects them, but allow people to break the rule when it makes them look good.

    Offline Hatchc

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 521
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PatrickG
    Mithrandylan - here we go:
    http://www.s.com/forum/index.php?topic=2547.0
    They don't seem to like the URL - you'll have to edit in the name yourself!
    I've posted as you asked - it's a pleasure. I hope I didn't pull any punches.

    This led me on to a more general thought about 'Catholic' forums - are they singled out for attacks by the Devil? The gruesome abomination on Fish Eaters is the most obvious, but crypto-feminism and feminism (here, I will say it plainly, erin is nice, Penelope and others) on S.D. as well as neo-Catholics running about (poche, Older Salt, Cool Cat) unchecked on both are  very pernicious.

    I expect the Devil does single out organs of resistance, whether as petty as a forum or as once great as the SSPX, to fight and attempt to destroy.


    The rot begins at the top. A corrupt forum indicates a corrupt owner. Vox is corrupt. And Kaesekopf is infected with feminism and also appears somewhat Judaized. He started a thread recently to express bewilderment as to why many Catholics show an interest in the Jєωs.





    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PatrickG
    Mithrandylan - here we go:
    http://www.s.com/forum/index.php?topic=2547.0
    They don't seem to like the URL - you'll have to edit in the name yourself!
    I've posted as you asked - it's a pleasure. I hope I didn't pull any punches.

    This led me on to a more general thought about 'Catholic' forums - are they singled out for attacks by the Devil? The gruesome abomination on Fish Eaters is the most obvious, but crypto-feminism and feminism (here, I will say it plainly, erin is nice, Penelope and others) on S.D. as well as neo-Catholics running about (poche, Older Salt, Cool Cat) unchecked on both are  very pernicious.

    I expect the Devil does single out organs of resistance, whether as petty as a forum or as once great as the SSPX, to fight and attempt to destroy.




    The Devil's modus operandi has not changed in 2000 years - "Divide and Conquer" - this applies to wherever truth and unity is found, including Catholic Forums.

    When forum owners permit the libs and neo's to divide, they will conquer - simply reference FE and the route it took into the sewer. If SD's owner permits the libs and neo's to spread their fem and NO garbage without correction, SD will end up being, if not already, conquered as well.

    SD would have done much better to model itself after CathInfo instead of FE - especially after seeing how the libs and NOers were able to send FE sliding into the septic tank.






     



    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Hatchc

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 521
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's a substantial contrast in the quality of the criticism that goes on between these self-described trad Catholic forums. The people on this forum formulate sound arguments and point to specific violations of Catholic teaching on other forums like Fisheaters, IgnisArdens, and Susscippe Dominnee. But the people on these other forums do not treat CathInfo with similar thoughtfulness. They offer no arguments against this forum. They solely rely on putdowns. You'd think someone at some time would have some concrete criticism of this forum, but no one ever does. I've been reading these people criticize CathInfo for years and all they have to offer is schoolyard putdowns.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Hatchc
    There's a substantial contrast in the quality of the criticism that goes on between these self-described trad Catholic forums. The people on this forum formulate sound arguments and point to specific violations of Catholic teaching on other forums like Fisheaters, IgnisArdens, and Susscippe Dominnee. But the people on these other forums do not treat CathInfo with similar thoughtfulness. They offer no arguments against this forum. They solely rely on putdowns. You'd think someone at some time would have some concrete criticism of this forum, but no one ever does. I've been reading these people criticize CathInfo for years and all they have to offer is schoolyard putdowns.



    I agree.

    I really only peruse the other forums very little but it does not take much to see the liberal position they hold most of the time, most notably with their direct or indirect sympathy toward the destroyer of the Church - the NO.

    Folks like Mith have little in common with the libs there - and some others there  will discover the same thing at some point. Just a matter of when.
     
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If the owner at Fish Kill treated the libs, feminαzιs, and defenders of the Chosenites with the harshness that she administers to sedes and people who simply defend the Faith, she wouldn't be conducting the runaway train she is now.
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SD is an utter joke. There are certain members there who give Catholicism a bad name, and its owner always takes up for the liberals, just like VoxClamantis.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PatrickG
    Mithrandylan - here we go:
    http://www.s.com/forum/index.php?topic=2547.0
    The requested URL "www.s.com" cannot be found or is not available. Please check the spelling or try again later.

    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3849/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't know much about the other Catholic forums. I don't like reading liberal garbage so I avoid fisheaters and the other neo-trad forums. I sometimes go to bellarmine forums. I can read that forum, but most of my forum time is spent here.
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.


    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Quote from: PatrickG
    Mithrandylan - here we go:
    http://www.s.com/forum/index.php?topic=2547.0
    The requested URL "www.s.com" cannot be found or is not available. Please check the spelling or try again later.


    You have to replace "s" with "s u s c i p e d o m i n e" in the URL.
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Napoli

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 716
    • Reputation: +707/-0
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This forum is by far the most catholic. Some of the other's have made me have to jump in the shower and bathe. The filth and stench are palatable.
    I pray that this forum remains clean. We have to all be vigilant, as Mathew has pointed out, for this to happen.

    Pax
    Regina Angelorum, ora pro nobis!

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Napoli
    This forum is by far the most catholic. Some of the other's have made me have to jump in the shower and bathe. The filth and stench are palatable.
    I pray that this forum remains clean. We have to all be vigilant, as Mathew has pointed out, for this to happen.

    Pax


    Yes. Nip it in the bud, if you will.
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Mithrandylan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4452
    • Reputation: +5061/-436
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Napoli
    This forum is by far the most catholic. Some of the other's have made me have to jump in the shower and bathe. The filth and stench are palatable.
    I pray that this forum remains clean. We have to all be vigilant, as Mathew has pointed out, for this to happen.

    Pax


    Quite right.

    I am very grateful for CI, especially at my reception here considering that I have been quite uncharitable in the past, before I was a traditional Catholic, hanging on to the ruins of the NO.

    I was originally under the impression that SD was going to be a traditional forum, as the forum administrator and mods had been banned or run out of FE for being 'disrespectful to the pope' and 'bashing the NO.'  My naivete is at fault here.  It did not take long to see that it was another social site with a Catholic backdrop.  What I'm about to say was deleted from the forum, but SD reminds me of a Martin Scorcese flick.  Scandal, liberalism and indecency with a Catholic imagery backdrop.  It's an offense to piety that they would impose the Sacred Heart Image upon that site.

    The most recent turn of events is just the nasty culmination of the majority of the sites history, which merely tolerates traditional Catholicism.  The administration endorses and promotes liberal and feminist sentiments, and as Bp. Williamson says, when the liberal is challenged the dove becomes a screeching and scratching hawk.  

    I made the mistake of assuming FE to be a good place for traditional Catholics and it was too late to speak up by the time I was banned.  I won't make that mistake with SD.  The administration sees fit to bully me off of the forum, as it were, so as not to ban me and make a 'martyr' of sorts who 'bad mouths' them other places.  That's another thing-- the grievances against the feminism and liberalism are never satisfied, they are simply referred to as bad mouthing and similar phrases.  Anyways, they prefer that I bad mouth them there, where they can lock and delete my posts.  I have an extensive catalog of the patently unCatholic events that have occurred there, from users posting songs which sɛҳuąƖize crucifixion (btw-- a moderator had to ask the Administrators permission to remove that video... months after the fact) the Admin referring to the creators of St Mary's Resistance website as 'morons' the charges against me that I am a rapist, the maligning of my wife, NO apologizing, feminist propaganda promoted and defended... the list goes on.  


    I recall the beginning of my reversion, joining up at FE and how I was appalled at the 'pompous jerks' who criminalized the NO and relentlessly posted Church Teaching about sensitive topics.  It was those people, those traditional Catholics, that I so unjustly maligned as kooks and nutters and their relentless love and zeal for the faith that brought me to taking the faith seriously.  Not the liberals who wanted to grey all the principles and make excuses for vice and imperfection.  So, if God can use me as a tool to perform a similar service to a person who might be in my position, so be it.  Deus Vult!

    I will stay on SD to testify to the faith as best I know how.  I wish I would have had the presence of mind to do that with FE.  No doubt, administration of that forum will see this post and will talk about how I'm not man enough to say this on SD.... news flash, I've been saying it all for months, publicly, and privately, on that forum.  NOTHING in this post is news to anyone who reads SD.  

    Thanks to Matthew and the good hearted traditional Catholics who make up CI.  May God see fit to strengthen your faith and bring you ever closer to Him.
    "Be kind; do not seek the malicious satisfaction of having discovered an additional enemy to the Church... And, above all, be scrupulously truthful. To all, friends and foes alike, give that serious attention which does not misrepresent any opinion, does not distort any statement, does not mutilate any quotation. We need not fear to serve the cause of Christ less efficiently by putting on His spirit". (Vermeersch, 1913).