theology101
Reputation: 111
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 332
|
"The Jews didn't kill Jesus- crucifixion was a Roman method of execution. The Romans killed Jesus."
I keep hearing this nonsense, mostly from Protestant shabbos goyim, but also from many Catholics. I've also heard it said by Catholics that there was a "Jewish and Roman plot" to kill Jesus- in an attempt to soften things or somehow apologize for the Jews. Talk about grasping at straws! There was no "Roman plot" to kill Jesus- the romans had absolutely no problem with Jesus, at least those who knew of his existence didn't. Romans worshipped so many Gods they wouldn't have cared if Christ claimed to be a God, as the Jews accused him of. The ONLY people at the time who ever had a problem with Jesus, were the Jews, and they were the only ones who wanted to see him dead. They forced Pilate, through the threat of terrorism(riots), to kill Jesus, to be their shabbos goy. Just like Lehi and the modern "jews" forced the British, through terrorism, to abandon Palestine (Google Lehi, and the King David Hotel especially, if for some reason you are unfamiliar with the long history of Zionist terrorism). Yet every time I hear it, it is never refuted, or if it is, the truth is censored by the ADL and all the JIDF idiots out there. Still, anywhere one sees this nonsense, I think it is best to remind them of a few things:
Then Pilate [a Roman] announced to the chief priests and the crowd [the Jews], “I find no basis for a charge against this man.”
Pilate [a Roman] called together the chief priests, the rulers and the people [Jews], and said to them, “You [Jews] brought me this man as one who was inciting the people to rebellion. I have examined him in your presence and have found no basis for your charges against him. Neither has Herod, for he sent him back to us; as you can see, he has done nothing to deserve death.
When Pilate [a Roman] saw that he was not succeeding at all, but that a riot was breaking out instead, he took water and washed his hands in the sight of the crowd, saying, "I am innocent of this man's blood. Look to it yourselves." And the whole people [Jews] said in reply, "His blood be upon us and upon our children."
|
|
| Posted Jul 4, 2012, 2:00 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Diego
Reputation: 1201
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 1,304
|
The Deicides take credit in their filthy "Oral Torah" at the same time they acknowledge they had to connive His execution over the objections of the Romans:
“On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: ‘You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him!’” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)
|
|
| Posted Jul 4, 2012, 9:04 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
