Maizar
Reputation: 197
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 371
|
This article by Samman Mohammadi was interesting to me today. I quote part of it:
| Quote: |
From its very inception, Israel was created to be destroyed in a third world war against the forces of Islam, the result of which will be a one world order. It is a cruel and miserable fate for the Jews and the people of the Middle East.
The people of all countries involved in World War III are victims of the worldwide and generational conspiracy which is loosely referred to as a one world order/world government plot. This global plot/conspiracy is satanic in nature, and includes the leaders of both the Zionists and Islamists, who are secretly working for the globalists in America and England to create a one world order.
In 1979, the Persians and Kurds in Iran were hijacked by Western-backed political Islamists from the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran's religious fundamentalist community who are deeply involved in the secret global conspiracy to bring a one world government into being. The top Mullahs of Iran wear Muslim attire, but underneath, they are Freemasons part of the Illuminati who were placed into power by the shadow CIA and MI6.
Neither the leadership of Israel nor the leadership of Persia care about the well-being and security of their people. They don't have any spiritual or psychological ties to these two ancient and sacred lands which share a rich and deep history. They view the people as animals to be tricked and slaughtered, not as subjects to be ruled and well-fed, or as citizens to be represented and respected.
|
Can all this be averted?
|
|
| Posted Feb 20, 2012, 11:38 am |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
Raoul76
Reputation: 1962
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 0)
Posts: 5,104
|
If there is one area that is SURE to stand until the end of the world, it is Palestine, since that is where the final events of the Apocalypse will surely unfurl.
I am surprised all these people believe the fearmongering about an attack on Iran. America cannot invade Iran, it is not some banana republic like Iraq, it's a highly civilized nation. Any invasion would be squashed instantly. And who would be insane enough to start a nuclear war?
I don't believe for a second that Iran is really independent of the West. If there is a "war," it will not really be war, but just depopulation as a way to get out of the crisis. Bombs will drop in strategic places, USING THE IDEA OF IRAN VS. AMERICA AS A SCRIPT ( as in not real ). You will know it's not real in that Israel will certainly be spared; and I think the fact that the script is unconvincing is why they aren't going to go through with it. 9/11 wasn't convincing either but Israel surviving a nuclear war with Iran would look REALLY phony; yet of course, they would not allow Israel to be bombed. So they are stuck.
The West may also be trying to scare the Iranians. Perhaps there is a revolutionary faction that is threatening to take over the government, a more hardline anti-American faction, and this uneasy truce between Ahmadinejad and the West is staged in order to make it look like Ahmadinejad is more hardline, in order to keep him in power longer. He is a stooge of America, but through our media, where he is painted as a fanatic demon Muslim, we provide him with a kind of alibi. When the hardline Muslims of Iran see that we are treating Ahmadinejad as one of them, it gives him more credibility, you see, and staves off the chances of revolt. If the West were saying Ahmadinejad were America's boy, he'd have his head cut off in two seconds. But he is our boy, from what I can tell.
|
.........................
A general rule is that all my posts before 2011 are dangerous to read. At the time I was nothing short of a frothing Pharisee. Please ignore my old posts against NFP and implicit faith, both of which are true teachings, as well as Fatima and Lucy's later revelations, which I now see are of continuing paramount importance in the history of the Church.
I also apologize for my lack of prudence when speaking about clergy in the past, I didn't know where the line was and often judged intentions instead of actions and words. My deepest apologies to Pius XII especially, who I judged in the harshest light and accused of being a communist infiltrator. This was not intentional slander but my true belief at the time. I still have problems with his pontificate, but no proof of any intentional malice. I even insulted the Church itself by questioning his Holy Week reforms, for which I am, again, bitterly sorry. I also spoke unforgivably about Pius XI, suggesting or saying outright that he was also an infiltrator who was in effect working towards Vatican II.
I also apologize with profoundest regret to Abp. Lefebvre and Bp. Fellay, the nuns who left CMRI, for assuming malign intentions about all or some of them, and for saying the nuns were witches; Father Cekada and the SSPX priest Fr. Boulet for suggesting or saying they were deliberately intellectually dishonest, Bp. Vezelis for spreading a rumor about him that is not verified; I also apologize to Fr. Martin Stepanich, Mgr. Fenton, Father Brian Harrison, Cardinal Newman, De Lugo, Suarez, Erasmus, and anyone else I have forgotten, for saying or suggesting they were heretics and/or infiltrators due to my former errors. I was also very harsh on Dietrich von Hildebrand and Cardinal Gibbons due to my beliefs at the time, however, in their case, there was reason for concern, I just would not call them heretics, perhaps some of their ideas would have the theological note of "ill-sounding." During all this time, I was under the influence of major scruples, probably without even knowing what that meant, and had a distorted, extreme view of the Crisis.
|
| Posted Feb 20, 2012, 5:33 pm |
|
Ignored by: 0
|
|
|
