Anyone who knows me knows that I am not one on conspiracy theories...but this one at Sandy Hook looks pretty real...

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/02/21/sandy-hook-game-changer-solid-new-evidence-of-a-cover-up-presented/

Sandy Hook Game-Changer: Solid New Evidence of a Cover-Up Presented
FEBRUARY 21, 2014 BY 21WIRE 3 COMMENTS
21st Century Wire says…

If it all seems too unbelievable, that’s probably because it is…

The world was led to believe by US media and government authorities that a ‘mass shooting’ was carried out by yet another deranged lone gunman, only after reports had initially stated there was  a second shooter on several CBS and ABC affiliates. This latter-day Oswald is named Adam Lanza (below), who had no real motive, an aversion to shooting (so we were told at the time), and no one had actually seen in 3-4 years – and a gunman who is believed by some to have a different identity.  



As evidence emerged out of the ‘boiler rooms’ of media halls, mainstream correspondents began selling the public on this latest tragic shooting in America. Not since Columbine had the corporate media been so fixated on an apparent tragic shooting, pushing the fear and death of it all on a 24/7 news loop.

Because the case has now been “classified” by the FBI, it’s hard to find any evidence of a mass shooting, but there seems to be more than ample evidence of a cover-up.

But a few brand new discoveries and key expert witness questions have emerged this week that could rip this event wide open…

Washington’s Blog

Wolfgang Halbig has the perfect combination of expertise to evaluate what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School:

Law enforcement: Florida State Trooper, US Customs Agent.
Education: teacher, assistant principal, principal.

Current school safety expert: trained key personnel at over 4,000 US school districts, and over 3,500 school safety officers.

His conclusion after ten months of motivated investigation:

“In my professional opinion, [Sandy Hook was] a scripted event… in planning for maybe two, two and a half years.”

Mr. Halbig’s response is demand for criminal arrests of “leaders” involved in Sandy Hook based on rational embrace of the public evidence he explains in the interview:

law enforcement parked 1/4 mile away upon arrival. Why didn’t they rush to a heart-wrenching emergency if it really occurred?

no trauma helicopters were ordered. This is unheard of for an actual emergency.
no paramedics were allowed in the school. This is unheard of.

officials refuse to say who declared all 26 people dead. By law, this must come from a doctor. This refusal of so much basic information indicates lies and cover-ups.

official narrative claims emergency personnel didn’t find the school secretary and nurse after 4 hours of searching.

this “event” included a traffic sign lit with the message, “everyone must sign in.” Officials refuse any comment on this element that would be present for a staged event/drill.

porta potties were on site; again with no comment by officials and consistent with holding a staged event.

no names were listed for the 26 children and chorus director at the 2013 Super Bowl event in honor of Sandy Hook. The children resemble the alleged shooting victims. It’s unimaginable to not list these names for such a huge deal.
no lawsuits filed by parents for negligence against school district. This is unheard of.

a shooter with Aspergers would have poor motor skills and muscle tone – how did he carry all the gear and shoot with such precision? This combination is impossible to imagine.

2 homicide investigators threatened Mr. Halbig for making inquiries consistent with his professional duties to learn about this event for future school safety.
Newtown Public Schools won’t return any calls. Mr. Halbig says this non-cooperation to contribute information for other schools’ safety is unheard of.
the FBI classified the report on Sandy Hook. This has never been done before, and indicates a cover-up of all the evidence that this was a staged event.
radio transmissions are consistent in tone and content for a drill, not an actual emergency.

multiple weapons reported at a limited crime scene were never found. This is not credible.

law enforcement sent a kindergarten girl from the hall to stay at the crime scene of room 8 to be alone with dead bodies. This is a ridiculous claim that demands investigation and answers.

no parents viewed the bodies of their children. This is also unheard of.
no docuмents are being released via Freedom of Information Act requests. This is unheard of.

trauma services were never requested. This would never occur.
tearing down the school is consistent with destruction of evidence, given the HUGE gaps between official accounts and the evidence.

there’s zero evidence that a bio-hazard company was contacted to clean blood, bodily fluids, and officials refuse comment. This is impossible.

Mr. Halbig’s inquiries of who installed the school security system has been met with silence. This is unheard of to not get this information to improve other schools.

Mr. Halbig has the professional expertise to conclude the official story is impossible, and to demand arrests in order for the public to have the truth.
Sandy Hook is one of perhaps 100 areas of such importance. The 2014 Worldwide Wave of Action invites everyone’s participation to:

Expose 1% oligarchs in the US and elsewhere as OBVIOUS criminals centering in war, money, andmedia (also in ~100 other crucial areas).

Cause their surrender through arrests or Truth & Reconciliation.
Initiate true freedom for all Earth’s inhabitants to explore ready breakthroughs in economics (links here) and technology, and discover what it is to be human without psychopathic criminals who joke about killing millions, harming billions, and looting trillions.

If you haven’t heard it yet, listen to this incredibly revealing interview with school security expert Wolfgang Halbig here:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/rEfW9FvLyAg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]

Anyone who knows me knows that I am not one on conspiracy theories...but this one at Sandy Hook looks pretty real...

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/02/21/sandy-hook-game-changer-solid-new-evidence-of-a-cover-up-presented/

Sandy Hook Game-Changer: Solid New Evidence of a Cover-Up Presented
FEBRUARY 21, 2014 BY 21WIRE 3 COMMENTS
21st Century Wire says…




no parents viewed the bodies of their children.

I've already found one hole in this story.  A quick "google" using the phrase "sandy hook victims funerals open casket" promplty gave four accounts of open casket funerals (I didn't pursue the whole first page, may have been more).

Here is a news story about the only funeral home in Newtown, CT, which handled the final arrangements for the victims.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/newtown-undertaker-opens-week-hell-article-1.1221756

Here is a story about one of the victim's mother.  Governor of Connecticut  Dannel Malloy attended the child's open casket visitation at the funeral home.
http://www.quora.com/Brian-Browne-Walker/Posts/The-open-coffin-funeral-of-Sandy-Hook-victim-Noah-Pozner

Here is a story about the President of the Connecticut Funeral Directors Association who organized other volunteer morticians to assist with eleven of the funerals handled by the Honan Funeral Home.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/15/sandy-hook-shooting-victims-names_n_2307354.html

I'm not arguing about the facts surrounding the funerals. If the entire thing was fake, the funerals would be fake as well, so one needn't focus on funerals to address all the inconsistencies and the almost complete lack of detail in any statements or reports.

Quote

The medical examiner stated in the press conference the next day that parents ID'd the children only with photos, which is very unusual to say the least.

This is unusual, but understandable under the circuмstances.  There were 26 bodies.  Newtown is a small town with a population of 1,973 and only one small local funeral home.  I have some background in the death care business.  It would have taken several days to organize private viewings in a suitable environment for this large of a number.  It was important to positively identify each of the deceased as quickly as possible so that the Medical Examiner could complete his work and release the bodies to the families so that they could begin to make the funeral arrangements.  Also, several of the news stories indicated that many of the bodies were badly disfigured.  While still horrific to see I can imagine that viewing a picture would be somewhat less brutal for the families than viewing the body before the embalmer had been able to prepare it.  The families had the opportunity to view their children at the funeral home if they wished.

No, it's very unusual. Newtown is 28,000.

Quote from: moneil

Quote

The medical examiner stated in the press conference the next day that parents ID'd the children only with photos, which is very unusual to say the least.

This is unusual, but understandable under the circuмstances.  There were 26 bodies.  Newtown is a small town with a population of 1,973 and only one small local funeral home.  I have some background in the death care business.  It would have taken several days to organize private viewings in a suitable environment for this large of a number.  It was important to positively identify each of the deceased as quickly as possible so that the Medical Examiner could complete his work and release the bodies to the families so that they could begin to make the funeral arrangements.  Also, several of the news stories indicated that many of the bodies were badly disfigured.  While still horrific to see I can imagine that viewing a picture would be somewhat less brutal for the families than viewing the body before the embalmer had been able to prepare it.  The families had the opportunity to view their children at the funeral home if they wished.

No, it's very unusual. Newtown is 28,000.

I stand corrected on the population, I had relied on a source (City Data) that was wrong.  28,000 is still a small town, with just one funeral home.

Does the poster have a background in the death care industry (I do) which leads him to concur that this was very unusual rather than just unusual?

Let me go over this ONE more time.  When a family is required or wishes to make an identification viewing, after the coronor or medical examiner has compleated his initial investigation, the body is moved from the place of death to the medical examiners facility (in a very large city) or to a funeral home (in medium and small towns, such as Newtown).  There bloody clothing is removed, the body washed and redressed in clean clothing or a hospital gown.  Restorative or cosmetic work would not have commenced at this time.  The body is then refrigerated until arrangements are made for the family to come for the viewing.

There were 26 bodies (not counting the assailants and his mother).  There was one small town funeral home with just 3 people on staff, and likely only one of those was licensed to legally complete aspects of the arrangements (I am familiar with WA regulations but not CT, which could be different).  This facility likely could only refrigerate 2 - 4 bodies at a time (I am familiar with the equipment they use).  An identification viewing would ideally be compleated in 24-36 hours after death so that autopsies can be doon if needed, the coroner can compleate his paperwork and release the bodies, and families can begin to make funeral arrangements.

Under the very unusual circuмstances the decision of the medical examiner to use pictures for the initial indentification seems to me to have been both prudent and compassionate.  It seems to me that pictures would make this difficult task somewhat less brutal for the families than having to look at crumpled, bloody, and disfigured bodies sprawled on a school floor or lined up in a warehouse.  After the bodies are released by the coronor for burial the families had and always have the opportunity to have a private or public or both visitation in a more comfortable setting.

If there were pictures of dead bodies there would have to be dead bodies to take pictures of.  I don't understand what the issue is.

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: moneil

Quote

The medical examiner stated in the press conference the next day that parents ID'd the children only with photos, which is very unusual to say the least.

This is unusual, but understandable under the circuмstances.  There were 26 bodies.  Newtown is a small town with a population of 1,973 and only one small local funeral home.  I have some background in the death care business.  It would have taken several days to organize private viewings in a suitable environment for this large of a number.  It was important to positively identify each of the deceased as quickly as possible so that the Medical Examiner could complete his work and release the bodies to the families so that they could begin to make the funeral arrangements.  Also, several of the news stories indicated that many of the bodies were badly disfigured.  While still horrific to see I can imagine that viewing a picture would be somewhat less brutal for the families than viewing the body before the embalmer had been able to prepare it.  The families had the opportunity to view their children at the funeral home if they wished.

No, it's very unusual. Newtown is 28,000.

I stand corrected on the population, I had relied on a source (City Data) that was wrong.  28,000 is still a small town, with just one funeral home.

Does the poster have a background in the death care industry (I do) which leads him to concur that this was very unusual rather than just unusual?

Let me go over this ONE more time.  When a family is required or wishes to make an identification viewing, after the coronor or medical examiner has compleated his initial investigation, the body is moved from the place of death to the medical examiners facility (in a very large city) or to a funeral home (in medium and small towns, such as Newtown).  There bloody clothing is removed, the body washed and redressed in clean clothing or a hospital gown.  Restorative or cosmetic work would not have commenced at this time.  The body is then refrigerated until arrangements are made for the family to come for the viewing.

There were 26 bodies (not counting the assailants and his mother).  There was one small town funeral home with just 3 people on staff, and likely only one of those was licensed to legally complete aspects of the arrangements (I am familiar with WA regulations but not CT, which could be different).  This facility likely could only refrigerate 2 - 4 bodies at a time (I am familiar with the equipment they use).  An identification viewing would ideally be compleated in 24-36 hours after death so that autopsies can be doon if needed, the coroner can compleate his paperwork and release the bodies, and families can begin to make funeral arrangements.

Under the very unusual circuмstances the decision of the medical examiner to use pictures for the initial indentification seems to me to have been both prudent and compassionate.  It seems to me that pictures would make this difficult task somewhat less brutal for the families than having to look at crumpled, bloody, and disfigured bodies sprawled on a school floor or lined up in a warehouse.  After the bodies are released by the coronor for burial the families had and always have the opportunity to have a private or public or both visitation in a more comfortable setting.

If there were pictures of dead bodies there would have to be dead bodies to take pictures of.  I don't understand what the issue is.

It appears you believe this happened, I understand that. The fact is that we are being asked to believe that nobody identified their loved ones in person, that nobody requested that they be able to identify their loved ones in person, even though the temporary morgue was set up right on the premises.

We are also asked to believe that everyone was assumed dead and no resuscitation efforts were made on anybody, nor was anybody injured in that area that required medical attention.

We are also asked to believe that every single person who was shot was killed. No injuries treated in the school building.

Let me ask you a question ... did you follow this event when it happened?

Did you see the helicopter news footage that clearly showed officers entering St. Rose of lima school down the road?

Did you watch the chase into the woods clearly hours after the shootings supposedly took place?

Did you know they tore the school down and pulverized the debris into dust before it was removed from the site?

These and about 1000 other questions need to be answered.

Salon.com ?

If someone wants to "hate" I'll add them to my prayer list. ???