crashnet
Level 1
Reputation: 9
(Likers: 0 / Critics: 1)
Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: Feb 5, 2010
|
What did the predecessors of anti-pope Pius V think of the infamous author of Ex omnibus afflictionibus?
From this page we read:
"Ghisleri, a wise and faithful guardian of Catholic doctrine, himself came to be suspected by Pope Paul IV, "his mind ever darker and violent" (Pastor). In the early August of 1559 he had given lodging to an envoy of Carranza and for that sole reason Paul IV spent half an hour hurling abuse at him during a Consistory. To the embarrassment of those present, the Pope insulted him, declared him unworthy of the purple and threatened to lock him up in Castle Sant'Angelo. Ghisleri listened in silence to the humiliating attack. Already on a previous occasion the Pope had called him "Lutheran" and "unfrocked priest", an odd ordeal for the man who was to become the patron saint of the Holy Office. Things, however, were to go even worse with the new Pope, Gianangelo de' Medici, elected as Pius IV in January, 1560. Not only was Ghisleri sacked from his post as Inquisitor General because of their disagreements but he was also deprived of his apartment in the Vatican."
|
|
| Posted Feb 6, 2010, 6:17 am |
|
Ignored by: 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpiritusSanctus
Level 5
Reputation: 1405
(Likers: 103 / Critics: 63)
Group: Members
Posts: 4,719
Joined: May 21, 2010
|
| Anticlímax said: | Clearly, the moral decay, especially among the popes of the Renaissance, and the idolatry of Scholastic culminated in the perversion of Catholic doctrine in heresies that only sustained criticism from those who saw that besides the unwillingness of some popes, there was the whisper of Satan. Antipope Pius V was only the first of the anti-augustinian heretics, which is also added to the modern apostates.
The wrath of Pope Paul IV represented nothing more than the awakening of his conscience before the suspicion of infidelity to Christ. The Holy Spirit certainly alerted him to take some steps. What about Pope Pius IV, it is clear that he acted with caution, so he sentenced Michael Bayus to keep silent so that we can not say that Pius IV acted entirely wrong. I believe that Pius IV represented a transition, if that can be imagined, since he was a legitimate pope. However, unlike his predecessor, Pius V made concessions with Satan. |
Where in the world did you get the crazy idea that Pius V made concessions with Satan? The Pope who helped create the Traditional Latin Mass made concessions with Satan? Please!
|
.........................
"The Novus Ordo Missae, even when said with piety and respect for the liturgical rules, is impregnated with the spirit of Protestantism...it bears within it a poison harmful to the Faith". -Marcel LeFebvre, founder of SSPX
|
| Posted Jun 24, 2010, 9:37 pm |
|
Ignored by: 5
|
|
|
roscoe
Level 5
Reputation: 36
(Likers: 44 / Critics: 56)
Group: Members
Posts: 5,665
Joined: Jan 6, 2008
|
Raoul also has implied that St Pius X is an anti-pope.
|
.........................
No one has ever presented Any evidence from the Bible, a Pope, Church Council, Father, Doctor, Saint, historian, INQ, Bps Pastoral Letter, nor Catholic Encyclopedia or Dictionary that there is or ever has been such a person as a 'sede vacantist' or a state of affairs known as 'sede vacantism' before the V2 era.
|
| Posted Jun 24, 2010, 10:14 pm |
|
Ignored by: 18
|
|
|
Jamie
Level 3
Reputation: 9
(Likers: 4 / Critics: 9)
Group: Members
Posts: 529
Joined: Nov 23, 2009
|
| Anticlímax said: | | SpiritusSanctus said: | | Anticlímax said: | Clearly, the moral decay, especially among the popes of the Renaissance, and the idolatry of Scholastic culminated in the perversion of Catholic doctrine in heresies that only sustained criticism from those who saw that besides the unwillingness of some popes, there was the whisper of Satan. Antipope Pius V was only the first of the anti-augustinian heretics, which is also added to the modern apostates.
The wrath of Pope Paul IV represented nothing more than the awakening of his conscience before the suspicion of infidelity to Christ. The Holy Spirit certainly alerted him to take some steps. What about Pope Pius IV, it is clear that he acted with caution, so he sentenced Michael Bayus to keep silent so that we can not say that Pius IV acted entirely wrong. I believe that Pius IV represented a transition, if that can be imagined, since he was a legitimate pope. However, unlike his predecessor, Pius V made concessions with Satan. |
Where in the world did you get the crazy idea that Pius V made concessions with Satan? The Pope who helped create the Traditional Latin Mass made concessions with Satan? Please! |
Only a demon could want to plaster the liturgy. The Traditional Latin Mass is a pantomime for the blind. |
So what exactly is the correct liturgy?
|
|
| Posted Jun 25, 2010, 5:52 am |
|
Ignored by: 1
|
|
|
